Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - AUStudent

#1
8-16 from the line

ouch
#2
congrats Manchester keep representing  ;D
#3
got to think the regular season race is Anderson's to lose at this point.

been watching from afar this season ready for tourney time
#4
watched the whole thing, anderson won it
#5
AU won 73-71.  St. Thomas missed a 3 of the back off the rim at the buzzer
#6
RAVENS WIN RAVENS WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#7
Slyder has completely turned AU around and won the regular season title, easy choice IMO.
#8
we are going dancing ;D ;D

Go Ravens and go HCAC!
#9
Multi-Regional Topics / Re: Pool C
February 28, 2010, 08:39:36 PM
Quote from: Titan Q on February 28, 2010, 07:04:11 PM
Listening to the Hoopsville interview with the Anderson head coach.  A whole bunch of sour grapes being thrown around there...wow.

* They had a game "stolen" from them at Hanover
* No one will play them (including teams that regularly play the likes of Wash U and other great programs)
* Inferred some type of reason other than criteria is why Wheaton and IWU are ranked higher in the region
* Wants credit for playing Platteville...even though out of region


Interesting interview.
where can i listen to this at?

thanks


quote formatting fixed
#10
does Anderson really have a good shot?
#11
Quote from: wc4252 on February 28, 2010, 08:41:00 AM
Well as of right now they have AU projected as the last team in.  Still seems like a long-shot to me but there is a glimmer of hope. 

yeah I was under the impression we played a pretty difficult schedule OOC but I guess we really didn't.

Anyways, Congrats to Defiance,  you could have mailed it in a couple different times in the 2nd half and didn't, here is hoping AU gets in.
#12
tonight should be fun


looking forward to it

Go Ravens
#13
Man Transy got smoked
#15
Quote from: Darryl Nester on February 26, 2007, 02:35:36 PM
Quote from: AUStudent on February 25, 2007, 11:32:27 PM
wouldn't be that hard to have 8 and 9 play on Mon. Have your quarters on Wen. and Semis and Finals on Fri and Sat.
Just one extra game.  Stupid they went to 4 teams.
I think there would be problems with having a play-in Monday night for the 8/9 teams; that would mean that players from one of those teams could potentially miss three days of classes that week (Monday/Wednesday/Friday).  As a professor, I would not be happy to have a student-athlete tell me that he might be missing an entire week of my MWF afternoon class because of the tournament.  I know that our athletic department has a policy limiting the number of games during the week, and I suspect others do, too.

One motivation for going to 4 teams was to avoid having a quarterfinal game on Tuesday (as we have done in the past).  As I understand it, this issue arose (at least in part) because Rose-Hulman's academic calendar has them taking exams during tournament week, and they did not want their students to compete during that time.

Mind you, I still support expanding the tournament, but including the #9 team might not be feasible.


I wouldn't be against leaving the #9 team out and just going with 8 like normal.  This year unless you had a class at 3 on Monday you wouldn't have missed class just going to Rose.  I see your point though if it was AU @ Transy at say 8 p.m. you still have to leave by no later than 3.