now what's all this about me not offering any evidence that trinity has lowest academic standards within nescac football.
i will restate for the mouth-breathing trinity posters again. i cited 3 examples:
1) lowest nescac median sats ( barron's)
2) lowest nescac ranking ( us world and news report )
3) lowest nescac selectivity rate --not even in top 100 nationwide for all schools. ( usw&nr)....laughable.
that's pretty hard evidence that trinity is butt-bottom last academically in this league. the trinity situation presents both a problem and an opportunity for a fresh approach to league admissions standards. trinity has disgraced itself and the league through its violations of the spirit of nescac mission statement. as a nescac athlete myself i am ashamed that trinity is a part of nescac. trinity is ( was ) honor-bound by the nescac mission statement ( which i posted earlier ). it's one thing for an athlete to make ill-advised, morally-compromised decisions in an effort to gain an advantage on the playing field but when an institution, one supposedly committed to the pursuit of academic excellence as the m.s. calls for, seeks to leverage its low academic standards to develop a dominant athletic program, then the situation poses a threat to league unity and harmony. trinity, itself, is in turmoil over its poor peer academic standing and the shame spiral many there feel at being so academically inferior to their nescac brethren has become quite public. in complete disgust, some trinity alums are calling for the for severe athletic reform at trinity while, sadly, others feel the only solution is terminating the football program. the trinity football program is such a concern across the league that certain factions here at amherst claim that the role ( read: presence) of athletics in nescac needs to be reassessed entirely.
in response to that concern i propose that an league academic index be utilized in the future to insure the that embarrassments like trinity's football program don't go unchecked in the future and to head off efforts by certain factions within academia to severly limit the stature and scope of nescac athletics. to that end, i propose that nescac institute a floor index (minimum academic s.a.t. and g.p.a. standards) for all freshmen and transfer student-athletes applying to nescac schools. ( for bowdoin which, I hear, doesn't require s.a.t.s something would have to be worked out ). the ivy league utilizes such an index with good success and there's no reason why nescac shouldn't as well. the difference is that my proposal is a more concrete metric and would have better oversight ( a clearinghouse would be established to review data and insure compliance). through this measure economies of scale are acheived, transparancy will be attained, and an atmosphere of trust will be engendered. the index is simpler and less byzantine than the ivy counterpart and can't be massaged-- as the ivy version can. its a better mousetrap with less bells and whistles but above all it would insure that no school's standards could be dropped so low as to acheive an unfair advantage on the playing field. we all know a league standard is long overdue and would go a long way to resurrecting league harmony and mutual respect. it would, above all, be good medicine for a place like trinity that strays from a league mission statement by which all members are presently honor bound.
Lastly from the 10/25/5 trinity student paper op page, here's more insight into the scope of trinity's inferiority complex:
"......Again, I offer an apology to Ericson, for he has our best interests at heart. This letter just represents an unsettling theme - a theme in which Trinity College as an institution acts like a creepy dude at the beach with a cucumber in his speedo. Bear with me as I continue that metaphor, a la the oversexed Tripod Features or the "AT" column. Trinity wants to compete with the porn stars of the NESCAC (Williams, Amherst, Bowdoin) but simply can't. We just don't have the magnificent endowment (har-har) that these schools possess. But we can't stop complaining. This is what bugs me. This is why I'm cranky. I'm going to come out and say it: Trinity College has penis envy. Care to disagree? Our mascot, the Bantam, is defined as a small, angry cock. Disquieting.
Perhaps, somewhere, God is laughing at us. "
i know i am, and so is the rest of the league.
i will restate for the mouth-breathing trinity posters again. i cited 3 examples:
1) lowest nescac median sats ( barron's)
2) lowest nescac ranking ( us world and news report )
3) lowest nescac selectivity rate --not even in top 100 nationwide for all schools. ( usw&nr)....laughable.
that's pretty hard evidence that trinity is butt-bottom last academically in this league. the trinity situation presents both a problem and an opportunity for a fresh approach to league admissions standards. trinity has disgraced itself and the league through its violations of the spirit of nescac mission statement. as a nescac athlete myself i am ashamed that trinity is a part of nescac. trinity is ( was ) honor-bound by the nescac mission statement ( which i posted earlier ). it's one thing for an athlete to make ill-advised, morally-compromised decisions in an effort to gain an advantage on the playing field but when an institution, one supposedly committed to the pursuit of academic excellence as the m.s. calls for, seeks to leverage its low academic standards to develop a dominant athletic program, then the situation poses a threat to league unity and harmony. trinity, itself, is in turmoil over its poor peer academic standing and the shame spiral many there feel at being so academically inferior to their nescac brethren has become quite public. in complete disgust, some trinity alums are calling for the for severe athletic reform at trinity while, sadly, others feel the only solution is terminating the football program. the trinity football program is such a concern across the league that certain factions here at amherst claim that the role ( read: presence) of athletics in nescac needs to be reassessed entirely.
in response to that concern i propose that an league academic index be utilized in the future to insure the that embarrassments like trinity's football program don't go unchecked in the future and to head off efforts by certain factions within academia to severly limit the stature and scope of nescac athletics. to that end, i propose that nescac institute a floor index (minimum academic s.a.t. and g.p.a. standards) for all freshmen and transfer student-athletes applying to nescac schools. ( for bowdoin which, I hear, doesn't require s.a.t.s something would have to be worked out ). the ivy league utilizes such an index with good success and there's no reason why nescac shouldn't as well. the difference is that my proposal is a more concrete metric and would have better oversight ( a clearinghouse would be established to review data and insure compliance). through this measure economies of scale are acheived, transparancy will be attained, and an atmosphere of trust will be engendered. the index is simpler and less byzantine than the ivy counterpart and can't be massaged-- as the ivy version can. its a better mousetrap with less bells and whistles but above all it would insure that no school's standards could be dropped so low as to acheive an unfair advantage on the playing field. we all know a league standard is long overdue and would go a long way to resurrecting league harmony and mutual respect. it would, above all, be good medicine for a place like trinity that strays from a league mission statement by which all members are presently honor bound.
Lastly from the 10/25/5 trinity student paper op page, here's more insight into the scope of trinity's inferiority complex:
"......Again, I offer an apology to Ericson, for he has our best interests at heart. This letter just represents an unsettling theme - a theme in which Trinity College as an institution acts like a creepy dude at the beach with a cucumber in his speedo. Bear with me as I continue that metaphor, a la the oversexed Tripod Features or the "AT" column. Trinity wants to compete with the porn stars of the NESCAC (Williams, Amherst, Bowdoin) but simply can't. We just don't have the magnificent endowment (har-har) that these schools possess. But we can't stop complaining. This is what bugs me. This is why I'm cranky. I'm going to come out and say it: Trinity College has penis envy. Care to disagree? Our mascot, the Bantam, is defined as a small, angry cock. Disquieting.
Perhaps, somewhere, God is laughing at us. "
i know i am, and so is the rest of the league.