DF,
You are an idiot. You have no idea what you are talking about and I think I speak for most when saying that we are sick of hearing your ridiculious comments about the games.
"If the team isn't doing what the coach wants them to do. Sit em down."
In that case, Hern and Hodge would never play because their defense has been very questionable all year. You have even said that yourself. You contradict yourself all the time and I'm tired of hearing it. Next you are gonna say "well somebody has to score some points and that is why those two should play." If thats the case, then you shouldn't have said the comment above.
This is a team game and no the two best shooters don't have to shoot the ball the most every game and I feel that the explanation for most people on here would be pretty obvious, but for you I'll go ahead and explain. Since they are the best two shooters most teams will plan their defensive scheme around them and take them away as it sounds Wabash tried to do. Therefore, at some point other guys are going to have to step up and make some shots if the team is going to be succesful. If not, the two are going to end up forcing some bad shots and turning the ball over more than normal. I'm not saying Krantz should have shot 18 times, but I do like that he wasn't afraid to step up and take the shots he was given. You must take what the defense gives you and some nights that may mean Krantz and Izzo take 15 shots while Hern and Hodge take 8. It all depends on the situtation and that seems to be something you don't understand. Things aren't the same every single game like you want them to be. If Denison got beat by Witt by 35 and played 12 guys you would blame Ghiloni for playing too many people when it really had nothing to do with it. Just please get a clue.
You are an idiot. You have no idea what you are talking about and I think I speak for most when saying that we are sick of hearing your ridiculious comments about the games.
"If the team isn't doing what the coach wants them to do. Sit em down."
In that case, Hern and Hodge would never play because their defense has been very questionable all year. You have even said that yourself. You contradict yourself all the time and I'm tired of hearing it. Next you are gonna say "well somebody has to score some points and that is why those two should play." If thats the case, then you shouldn't have said the comment above.
This is a team game and no the two best shooters don't have to shoot the ball the most every game and I feel that the explanation for most people on here would be pretty obvious, but for you I'll go ahead and explain. Since they are the best two shooters most teams will plan their defensive scheme around them and take them away as it sounds Wabash tried to do. Therefore, at some point other guys are going to have to step up and make some shots if the team is going to be succesful. If not, the two are going to end up forcing some bad shots and turning the ball over more than normal. I'm not saying Krantz should have shot 18 times, but I do like that he wasn't afraid to step up and take the shots he was given. You must take what the defense gives you and some nights that may mean Krantz and Izzo take 15 shots while Hern and Hodge take 8. It all depends on the situtation and that seems to be something you don't understand. Things aren't the same every single game like you want them to be. If Denison got beat by Witt by 35 and played 12 guys you would blame Ghiloni for playing too many people when it really had nothing to do with it. Just please get a clue.