My dear whitecalyxx:
Just wanted to clarify some points you made:
1) The generals did not have but two leads in the entire game (when Nadeau hit two on the line in OT and when Kane hit one of two a little later in OT). Therefore, other than the E&H game, I'm not quite sure of the big lead of which you speak.
2) Check my posts and all others by fellow "Generals" and you'd be much better served than making blanket statements like "the Generals...they question the refs." Stereotyping all "Generals" really serves you well.
3) If you look back at my previous post, you will see that I didn't question for just W&L but said the refs were poor for both teams and specifically played a role down the stretch. Additionally, did I say that the referees were to blame for the generals loss or are you simply assuming I meant it? I simply posed a question to the Lynchburg fans/SIDs and wanted to get their side of the story.
Now, I agree, the generals have continually been plagued with forcing balls into traffic and racking up the TOs. I agree that shooting the three when you're near the bottom of the ODAC in 3 percentage is unwise. The generals have problems: they're 9-16 for crying out loud! But does 26 turnovers and poor outside shooting mean that the referees couldn't have negatively influenced the game? No it doesn't.
Just wanted to clarify some points you made:
1) The generals did not have but two leads in the entire game (when Nadeau hit two on the line in OT and when Kane hit one of two a little later in OT). Therefore, other than the E&H game, I'm not quite sure of the big lead of which you speak.
2) Check my posts and all others by fellow "Generals" and you'd be much better served than making blanket statements like "the Generals...they question the refs." Stereotyping all "Generals" really serves you well.
3) If you look back at my previous post, you will see that I didn't question for just W&L but said the refs were poor for both teams and specifically played a role down the stretch. Additionally, did I say that the referees were to blame for the generals loss or are you simply assuming I meant it? I simply posed a question to the Lynchburg fans/SIDs and wanted to get their side of the story.
Now, I agree, the generals have continually been plagued with forcing balls into traffic and racking up the TOs. I agree that shooting the three when you're near the bottom of the ODAC in 3 percentage is unwise. The generals have problems: they're 9-16 for crying out loud! But does 26 turnovers and poor outside shooting mean that the referees couldn't have negatively influenced the game? No it doesn't.