Well the Quakers have absolutely ruined their chances of making it to the conference semi-finals for their 3rd consecutive year! How disappointing it is for them to lose to the bottom two teams in the conference with a chance at hosting a first round game on the line. Hopefully they can go up to Wooster and at least keep it close and put a scare in the Scots. Jewett might have to go for 50 for them to have a chance. Which brings me to my next point....
How was Jewett not mentioned in the 1st team debate. In my opinion he was a lock for first team and a contender for POY, but with his teams awful finish, that may be out of the question. He ranks 3rd in scoring at 18.1, 17th in rebounding, 10th in Free throw %, and first in minutes played. I would consider those at least first team numbers considering every team's defensive game plan focused around slowing him down with double and even triple teams.
I remember talks last year about what exactly does POY mean? Is it the Most Valuable Player to his team, or the best player on the best team? If it is the most valuable player to his team, I go with Jewett, Hodgkinson, and Zimmer. Without those three players, I don't know if their teams would have won a single game. As for the best player on the best team, I think Port was an absolute stud and would receive my pick, but an argument could be made for Borchers as well.
My first team would go something like this...
Tom Port
Dane Borchers
Andrew Zimmer
Markous Jewett
Dan Hodgkinson
James Cooper
Yeah, I know I cheated and took 6, but I don't see who you could leave off of that team.
How was Jewett not mentioned in the 1st team debate. In my opinion he was a lock for first team and a contender for POY, but with his teams awful finish, that may be out of the question. He ranks 3rd in scoring at 18.1, 17th in rebounding, 10th in Free throw %, and first in minutes played. I would consider those at least first team numbers considering every team's defensive game plan focused around slowing him down with double and even triple teams.
I remember talks last year about what exactly does POY mean? Is it the Most Valuable Player to his team, or the best player on the best team? If it is the most valuable player to his team, I go with Jewett, Hodgkinson, and Zimmer. Without those three players, I don't know if their teams would have won a single game. As for the best player on the best team, I think Port was an absolute stud and would receive my pick, but an argument could be made for Borchers as well.
My first team would go something like this...
Tom Port
Dane Borchers
Andrew Zimmer
Markous Jewett
Dan Hodgkinson
James Cooper
Yeah, I know I cheated and took 6, but I don't see who you could leave off of that team.