The Oshkosh game was a tail of two halves:
First half Oshkosh controlled the game. Good shots, great offensive rebounding with easy putbacks, and it looked defensively they understood Superior's offense and took away easy shots.
But in the second half, Superior came out firing on all cylinders. You could see the their comfort and execution on offense. Hill was very good, they rebounded and shot the ball with confidence.
Marsh picked up two fouls with about 1:30 to go. I understand that Oshkosh had to foul but why keep Marsh in if he's your best player and you still have a chance to win?? Odd coaching decision in my mind
First half Oshkosh controlled the game. Good shots, great offensive rebounding with easy putbacks, and it looked defensively they understood Superior's offense and took away easy shots.
But in the second half, Superior came out firing on all cylinders. You could see the their comfort and execution on offense. Hill was very good, they rebounded and shot the ball with confidence.
Marsh picked up two fouls with about 1:30 to go. I understand that Oshkosh had to foul but why keep Marsh in if he's your best player and you still have a chance to win?? Odd coaching decision in my mind