Scot Van Pelt just suggested ithaca to play maryland for the bcs championship

It aint over till its over

my understanding is you can move up in football as long as basketball comes along and everything else can stay down. I don't think pat's explanation disagrees with me.

ah thanks, works good.

so it turns out I.ll be away from the radio and internet, other than my cell phone.s crippled internet. Preliminary results say I can access this board, but not the audio or the http://d3football.com/schedule.html page. is there anything i.m missing or should still try to get fisher curry updates

Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 11, 2007, 12:01:18 PM
cmon guys-i cant be the only person thats bent by this right?

well in reality it just means a little less notoriety for only making it to the quarters if fisher loses, if they win it would be dipterous assuming a one seed makes it to the semi's and fisher loses homefeild after beating mount union. it just ends the season sooner for the boys

now 74 56

hard to tell from the poor game updates but it looks like a safety followed by a safety punt return for navy jeeze

Quote from: ksc218 on November 10, 2007, 05:42:18 PM
DIII

QuoteMOST POINTS SCORED
105—Rockford vs. Trinity Bible, Sept. 6, 2003
MOST POINTS SCORED VS. DIVISION III
OPPONENT
97—Concordia-M'head vs. Macalester, Sept. 24,
1977
MOST POINTS SCORED, BOTH TEAMS
131—Earlham (69) & Manchester (62), Sept. 10,
2005
MOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
63—Cornell College vs. Coe, Oct. 25, 2003

DII

Quote
MOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
66—Western N.M. vs. Fort Lewis (67), Nov. 2, 2002
(2 ot)
Note: Record for regulation game—60, New Haven
vs. Southern Conn. St. (64), Oct. 25, 1991
MOST POINTS SCORED, BOTH TEAMS
136—North Park (104) & North Central (Ill.) (32), Oct.
12, 1968

DI bowl subdivision

QuoteMOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
(OVERTIME)
63—Kentucky vs. Arkansas (71), Nov. 1, 2003 (7 ot)
MOST POINTS, BOTH TEAMS, OVERTIME GAME
134—Arkansas (71) vs. Kentucky (63), Nov. 1, 2003
(7 ot)

DI Championship subdivision

QuoteMOST POINTS SCORED, BOTH TEAMS
125—Sacramento St. (64) & Cal St. Northridge (61),
Nov. 4, 2000 (18 TDs, 11 PATs, 3 2-pt. extra points)
MOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
61—Cal St. Northridge vs. Sacramento St. (64), Nov.
4, 2000

so it looks like utica is the best losing team in ncaa history and a few other things

I forgot the most points scored in dII which now shows the hartwick utica game is infact the highest scoring game by both teams

as well as the information is only accurate before this seasons started as the boise st game should definitely be in there

DIII

QuoteMOST POINTS SCORED
105—Rockford vs. Trinity Bible, Sept. 6, 2003
MOST POINTS SCORED VS. DIVISION III
OPPONENT
97—Concordia-M'head vs. Macalester, Sept. 24,
1977
MOST POINTS SCORED, BOTH TEAMS
131—Earlham (69) & Manchester (62), Sept. 10,
2005
MOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
63—Cornell College vs. Coe, Oct. 25, 2003

DII

Quote
MOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
66—Western N.M. vs. Fort Lewis (67), Nov. 2, 2002
(2 ot)
Note: Record for regulation game—60, New Haven
vs. Southern Conn. St. (64), Oct. 25, 1991

DI bowl subdivision

QuoteMOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
(OVERTIME)
63—Kentucky vs. Arkansas (71), Nov. 1, 2003 (7 ot)
MOST POINTS, BOTH TEAMS, OVERTIME GAME
134—Arkansas (71) vs. Kentucky (63), Nov. 1, 2003
(7 ot)

DI Championship subdivision

QuoteMOST POINTS SCORED, BOTH TEAMS
125—Sacramento St. (64) & Cal St. Northridge (61),
Nov. 4, 2000 (18 TDs, 11 PATs, 3 2-pt. extra points)
MOST POINTS SCORED BY A LOSING TEAM
61—Cal St. Northridge vs. Sacramento St. (64), Nov.
4, 2000

so it looks like utica is the best losing team in ncaa history and a few other things

can anyone confirm if the utica hartwick game is the highest scoring game in ncaa history? I know the boise st 60 something to 60something game a couple weeks ago was the highest d1 game

shame on me

they made it sound like it just happend

whtk radio reported "unofficially" the utica coach got either fired or quit at halftime. any word on this?

Quote from: sjfcards on March 11, 2007, 06:33:51 AM

Quote from: keystonelight on March 10, 2007, 05:29:52 PM
is this stevens point from wisconsin or is there a sp from the new jersey area? I did see some kids at the game last night with a hat on with a webbed stylized D on it and it reminded me of anaheims new logo to give you a mental image. But is that the new team that will be in the E 8? i hear there are going to be 2 new teams from NJ.

The school is actually called Stevens Tech, out of Hoboken, NJ... the ducks is the mascot. They are indeed the team that will be joining the Empire 8 next year. I wonder what the conference will do with the name? Empire 9...kind of lame...maybe it will just be named the empire conference?? Either way I believe that this is the only team joining the conference as a full member (all sports except football I believe). They should add some depth to the league as far as talent goes, but this is their first ever trip to the NCAA's so I am not sure how strong of a program they are. Hopefully it will bring some new competitiveness and talent to the league in all sports. I know their soccer program is one of the elite programs in the country, and I guess the baseball, Lax, and apparently Basketball teams are very good as well.

I think the E9 could stand to expand a little bit. Maybe add Springfield or Norwich as an all sports member. I guess Washington and Jefferson is also in the league for Field Hockey? They would seem to fit the mold of an E8 institution. smaller private school with a solid academic reputation. Any thoughts on restructuring? I am not sure if any of the schools I mentioned are at all interested in joining the leage, or if the E8 is interested. I just think with only 8 teams (9 next year) another school or two may not be such a bad deal. How many does the SUNYAC have? 11 I think. However, the league already has the automatic bids for all sports so I guess getting bigger may not be a huge priority. Mabye they should add a few schools and make an East and West division? Could add to the appeal of conference tournaments. Adding members could also add balance to sports that have been dominated by one team, like Fisher in basketball, or IC in baseball for example. Just some stuff I am thinking about after a 7 hour flight to L.A. and not having slept for over 24 hours.

Any thoughts/ideas?

big 10 has 11 teams.

i don't know how many of you were at the fisher/brockport game but would anyone put good and refs in the same sentence? i'm not even claiming all the calls went to brockport but I'm rather sure fisher lost the game because brockport got into bonus and double bonus too quick and kept churning the lead after these faux fouls.

so you at least concede the first fisher/brock game is irrelevant then?