I don't see how anyone can say the PAC is the strongest league around? How do you define around?
If PAC teams want to do better than one and done in the playoffs, they need to take a hard look at how they differ from the competition...perhaps look at the OAC.
Even if you discount MUC, what do Ohio Northern, BW and John Carroll have that W&J, GCC and Waynesburg do not?
Is it facilities? Is it financial aid (I know there's no athletic money)? Is it academics? Is it tradition?

Quote from: MandO18 on September 28, 2007, 08:49:23 AM
Geneva should pound LaSalle. Although they are 1AA they have a 28-0 loss to Ursinus and a 1 point loss to TCNJ. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think LaSalle has ever beaten a DIII team.

This isn't really a 1AA team vs a D3 team...since this is Geneva's first year in D3, it's really more of a 1AA vs NAIA since all of their key players are still guys on scholarship.

GCC is looking like a surprise team this year.
The Wolverines played two very good playoff teams tough
and beat TM on the road. TM was picked to finish 3rd in PAC.

I'm new to this board and to following PAC football...haven't really paid much attention to it since the late 70s....
Picking up on the "debate" about GCC....I agree that they have a talented backfield returning...but must rebuild the entire offensive line except center. What's the view on the young guys stepping up to play with who will be an all-league center?