Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - MediaGuy

#1
Went down a rabbit hole with only 8 games to watch and thought I'd put together a "Daddy Warbucks" bracket with all teams seeded and unlimited flights.
 Got some interesting matchups but also had 7 flights in the first round and 12 in the second assuming highest seed won in first round.

(can't figure out how to share a pdf or jpeg so if someone wants to let me know how, I'll share it)

#2
Quote from: DriftlessDuhawk on November 12, 2024, 10:53:22 PMWith regards to the looming playoffs, I think it is going to be very interesting to see how ARC teams schedule teams in the nonconference moving forward. Logan Hansen has long been ringing the bell that NPI simply favors win percentage (for this season and next) over scheduling good teams. I wonder if a team like Wartburg looks at their nonconference scheduling of St. Johns as a detriment due to that loss having potentially disastrous effects on their NPI number (yes I know they have locked up the conference AQ and thus it doesn't matter but if they did not it would). But for other teams in the conference (UD playing UWP and Aurora/Loras playing Hope) what good do these games do if these teams ever dream of getting into the tournament? I know Coe plays Cornell due to the history of that game but it is actually going to be the reason they get into the playoff field this year. Had they played a stronger opponent and lost it most likely would have kept them on the outside looking in.

I would like to think that following the next season the NPI dials would be reset but there are a number of conferences that are going to benefit from the current set-up and I would imagine they would push back against this idea. In the meantime, that sound you hear is Luther's phone ringing off the hook from every team in the country looking to take a trip to play in Decorah on the blue turf...

Scheduling is an art sometime and for solid top 15 teams, it can be difficult.  Wartburg only got 4 home games this year because we couldn't get anyone to sign a home/home agreement and other teams were asking for $ to come play a one season non-conference game in Waverly. 
The lower/mid level teams might be getting plenty of calls, but that just makes it more difficult for a Wartburg/SJU/NCC or WIAC team to get non-conference home games without cutting a check. 
#3
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 22, 2024, 02:30:56 PM
Quote from: MediaGuy on October 22, 2024, 02:26:05 PMHopefully the new NPI system will cut through the BS and actually rank teams accordingly...if those numbers were public, I would think Coe and Wartburg would be much closer than they are. 

Those numbers are public:
https://stats.ncaa.org/selection_rankings/nitty_gritties/39608


Thanks, I've been looking for those all year, and it does in fact rank Coe higher than Wartburg, proving my point...any chance I can call you for backup the next time I'm arguing with the wife?... ;D
#4
Quote from: Schipper Strong on October 20, 2024, 10:55:46 PM
Quote from: DBQ1965 on October 20, 2024, 07:01:12 PMSerious question:  In Grand Rapids, MI, I live too far away from IIAC/ARC to make an informed decision,  but I wonder how a 1 loss Wartburg team is ranked ahead of an undefeated Coe team?  Was the St. John's game that big for the Knights?
Wartburg gets a lot of credit for the past two years' playoff runs and their only loss being to the current number 3 team. Each round of the playoffs tends to require a significantly stronger team and making in to the semifinals twice proved they had made those steps. I think Coe deserves to be rated right up there with  Wartburg honestly.

Central lost to both Coe and Wartburg by only 4 points in each game with Coe going to double OT. I came away from both games feeling that they were winnable for Central. In the Wartburg game we really shot ourselves in the foot. The only TD scored in regulation time against both teams was when a pass to the player along the sideline got blown backward by the strong wind. The receiver didn't comprehend that it wasn't a forward pass and didn't jump on the ball or attempt to stop the WB player who picked it up and ran it in for a TD. That was enough to cost us the game. I would have played Brady Ketchum at QB all season and last year. He got to start Saturday and only got two offensive series before he was benched because of the score, but he was 6 of 6 in passing with two TDS.

Oops, got off topic. Back to Coe and Wartburg. I would say that on the days we played each team, I thought Coe was the better of the two. That is subjective of course as we actually took Coe to double OT. Coe was able to run against our defense that has been tough on the run all season better than Wartburg. Defensively they were both strong. I think the  Wartburg vs Coe game will be a real showdown. I will have no real idea how to pick when they play each other. Wartburg found their offense against Luther and beat them worse than we did, though we substituted earlier than I have ever seen. Then Wartburg didn't do as well against Simpson as we did. Maybe they substituted earlier because the Simpson coach was a WB grad or maybe it was because the coach knew what to expect out of WB because he was a grad.

Couple of insights from a Wartburg Fan...

As to why Coe is ranked lower than Wartburg with a better record...it's a subjective poll with human inputs, so there is always a latency bias weighted on what a team has done the last few years vs just this season.  There are always 4 or 5 WIAC teams ranked in the middle of the season because nobody knows who will come out of that mess on top.  Then by the end of the year, there is always 1 team in the top 10, and a few others from 11-25.  But I've seen most of those teams the last few years, and if the top 25 was just the top 25 teams, the top 4 or 5 teams in the WIAC should be ranked...but humans have a hard time ranking a 3 or 4 loss team in the top 25.  Also, I've always thought that a team needs a road playoff win in the previous few years to get some extra love in the polls.  Wartburg got that at St John's 2 years ago and followed it up with a 2nd semi final run.  What the head to head results really give you when looking at the polls is it gives teams "floors and ceilings".  Wartburg will not get above St. Johns without SJU losing 2 times, and SJU wont fall below Wartburg with 1 loss.  Hopefully the new NPI system will cut through the BS and actually rank teams accordingly...if those numbers were public, I would think Coe and Wartburg would be much closer than they are. 

As to the Wartburg/Central Game...
That was the worst played game from both teams I've seen in the series in quite some time.  Wartburg's QB had lost a lot of confidence after the bad game at SJU, and Wartburg just got crippled with little injuries.  In the 4th quarter, we were playing our 1st, 5th, 6th, 8th and 10th best o-lineman, some out of position.  And both teams made some horrendous mistakes, we had waaaay to many penalties and didn't play well on 3rd down.  I wish that game was in week 10 or 11 instead of so early in the season.

As to the Wartburg/Simpson Game...
Central was able to get ahead of Simpson and on tape it looked like the Storm was broken spiritually pretty early in that game. Wartburg had one of those weeks were Wartburg was great on 1st and 2nd down, and just came up short on 3rd and 4th.  In this league, most of the teams are capable of beating anyone, but the Wartburg/Central/Coe's of the league have historically been able to make the other teams believe they can't win pretty early in the game, thus the success.  If you get to halftime and the "lesser" team still believes they can win, you're in for a dogfight until you prove otherwise. Having seen Wartburg play everyone from North Central and Mount Union, to Luther and Greenville, I'm a believer that pretty much any team receiving votes in the Top 25 is capable of beating anyone on any given day...it all comes down to poise and play-making.  Wartburg has had a nasty habit of falling behind in big games, and somehow winning at the end, and it's been because the coaches don't panic, the players trust each other and everyone believes they can win.

As for this week's Coe/Wartburg Game...
I think it's an interesting match-up between 2 teams who have a similar game strategy...run the ball, take a few shots, and wear down the defense so they can run the ball late.  I expect to see more of an old-school Big 10 game, low scoring, good defense, and field position, rather than a SEC or PAC-10 game shootout.  I think that Coe will still get a Pool C with a loss and Wartburg will need St. John's to win out to get a Pool C with a loss.
#5
Quick question from your friends in the ARC Media...what is the correct pronunciation

(we-ack) or (y-ack)

having gone back to watch all the crazy games in the WIAC these last 2 weeks, there doesn't seem to be a consensus among the TV presenters.
#6
Quote from: faunch on April 24, 2024, 03:50:31 PMThrowing this out to the MIAC and D3 community. John Faison was a high school and MIAC football, basektball and baseball official. I don't know him personally but have followed his story. He took a tumble off a ladder last fall and suffered some awful injuries. He's on the mend but has a long road to recover.

https://www.faisonfamilyfundraiser.com/
https://www.gofundme.com/f/john-faison-and-family-medical-fund

I'm pretty sure his crew was officiating one of the Wartburg Playoff games and we heard that they had an official fall off a ladder.  I hope he is on the mend and back on the field soon.  In my experience, I like ARC officials the best but MIAC officials are waaaaaay better then the WIAC guys.
#7
Quote from: Jonny Utah on December 16, 2023, 09:41:31 AM
Quote from: D3fanboy on December 16, 2023, 09:36:48 AM
Quote from: Jonny Utah on December 16, 2023, 08:11:36 AM
Quote from: DriftlessDuhawk on December 16, 2023, 07:33:00 AM
Some talk on twitter/X from some Wartburg folks about how they felt that NCC knew all their plays in the semifinal game before they happened. A few folks implied a similar scheme to that that has been described at Michigan. The same accounts indicated that they informed the Cortland staff prior to the Stagg Bowl about this and that they needed to change their signals. Any of our Wartburg fans here know anything about this? Obviously sign stealing has always been a part of sports but if there were rules broken to do it then it is a different matter. Also some pretty big accusations to be throwing around...

I saw a comment mentioning this on Twitter.  I have to think it would be impossible for a team like ncc to scout on a team they don't even know they are playing, live, in one or two games and have the ability to steal a teams signals. 

Literally zero chance NCC is stealing Wartburgs or anyone signals.  But the thought has to cross your mind because of Michigan but even there we have no idea how much it helped or didn't help.

With the way some D3FB games are broadcast with a wide shot of the visiting sideline , it would be easier to gather the signals than from an iPhone a la Connor Stalions

Meh still a huge stretch.  These broadcasts usually never show the coaches (or three of them usually) sending in signals and they change those kids/coaches often anyway.

Here is a tweet from an unverified account...
https://x.com/LinemanDoc001/status/1735843401981927877?s=01
It would seem to show that there were video recorded signals playlists from Belhaven and Mount Union.

Not much to verify authenticity, but that is the evidence presented so far.
#8
Quote from: ncc_fan on December 03, 2023, 04:31:28 PM
Quote from: MediaGuy on December 03, 2023, 03:21:50 PM
Quote from: CardinalAlum on December 03, 2023, 12:33:14 PM
Looking forward to a great semifinal next week! Where's the best place to get lunch and a beer before the game in Waverly next Saturday?
The Dirty Dog, Sasquach Jack's and The Other Place are all good and a short walk from campus.  Frederick's or Z's Pizza is also good if you go about 10 blocks down the main drag.
I'd probably steer clear of Joe's Knighthawk if you're a visiting fan...that's where the "crazyiest" Wartburg fans will probably be.
From the street view on Google Maps it appears that Joe's Nighthawk is a bar/grill AND a self-service carwash :o. Is the car wash safe for NCC fans?  ;)
Should be, so long as NCC wears all white with the white helmets...Wartburg is black head to toe so an all white/black dynamic with the unis would look great
#9
Quote from: CardinalAlum on December 03, 2023, 12:33:14 PM
Looking forward to a great semifinal next week! Where's the best place to get lunch and a beer before the game in Waverly next Saturday?
The Dirty Dog, Sasquach Jack's and The Other Place are all good and a short walk from campus.  Frederick's or Z's Pizza is also good if you go about 10 blocks down the main drag.
I'd probably steer clear of Joe's Knighthawk if you're a visiting fan...that's where the "crazyiest" Wartburg fans will probably be.
#10
Quote from: d-train on November 14, 2023, 02:19:38 PM
Quote from: DriftlessDuhawk on November 14, 2023, 11:17:43 AM
That being said I have no doubt that the region 5 RAC knew exactly what they were doing when ranking Central 7th... I would think they understood that having Central ranked would give Coe a much better resume and would give them the upper hand in the selection process. If I was a St Johns fan I would certainly be upset but at the same time, everyone is playing by the same rules and the region 5 RAC didn't break any rules (though they may have bent them just a touch)...

Was there a more deserving team(s) for 6th/7th? Honest question, I'm not familiar enough with the region to know.

It would be hard to call shenanigans or say that the RAC bent rules if more deserving teams simply don't exist in the region.

I don't think there are any other teams in region 5 you would consider for a regional ranking, Concordia (WI) had 3 losses, as did WashU, the only other contender could have been Illinois College, and their only notable wins were Monmouth and Milikin so I don't see any other viable teams to rank.  Had Monmouth beaten IC then they would have been the only real possibility with a high SOS.  That being said, here is the membership of the Region 5 RAC...

Jason Imperati, chair Lawrence University Midwest Conference
Jeff McMartin Central College (IA) American Rivers Conference
Jesse Scott Wheaton College College Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin
Ben Cooprider Grinnell College Midwest Conference
Jim Hamad Aurora University Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference

Central's head coach is there and so is Wheaton's so there don't seem to be many people who are looking to help North Central. 

I understand North Central feeling that they got snubbed, they're the undefeated returning National Champ.  But when if you take the bare numbers on North Central's and Wartburg's resume without a team name on the top of the card, Wartburg had a better regular season on paper. In know it's a bit hollow coming from a Wartburg fan, but I think the RAC got it right.  If there is anyone to be upset at, it's the national committee for not switching North Central and UW-L.  Yes UW-L had a monster SOS, and plays in the WIAC, but North Central is undefeated and on a 25-0 winning streak, so if they obviously value W/L (thats how Coe is in over SJU) then they should have switched North Central and UW-L games in the bracket and nobody would be complaining until it's time to see where teams travel in the Semi's.
#11
General football / Re: Pool C 2023
November 07, 2023, 10:14:26 PM
After listening to the interview with the playoff committee chair, it seems like he is committed to sticking to the strict interpretation of the criteria when selecting the playoff field.  That being said, wouldn't it make sense to have blind selections for Pool C. 

It seems like you would have the best overall field as well as be able to say that they arent playing favorites or selecting a team based on previous seasons, if when the 6 teams were up for pool C consideration, there were no team names assigned, just W/L, SOS and RvRRO.

Does this happen now and if not, what does everyone think about doing it that way in the future?
#12
Quote from: SpartyBlue on November 06, 2023, 02:47:52 PM
Right, that's what you couldn't see on the video.  No one looked to be complaining too much on the UD side, though.

I checked with someone who has access to the ARC film database, where they upload the "all 22" game film, and there are definitely 12 players in formation for UD defense when the ball is snapped.
#13
Quote from: SpartyBlue on November 06, 2023, 02:19:25 PM
I only watched the replay online after reading doolittle's post and as a UD fan but football-neutral observer, it does look like they got the final call of fumble and recovery in the end zone correct, even if the side judge looks like he's signalling the ball carrier down. What you can't see are the mechanics of the illegal substitution call that would have ended the game on the prior fourth down.  What happened there?

Before the play, there was a timeout, where the play-by-play guy wondered if Coe would kick and tie the game or go for it.  After the timeout, Coe left the offense on the field.  In those cases, it's easy for the Defense to get a bit confused about what personnel should be on the field, so I assume there were 12 players in formation on the defense when the ball was snapped.  The only other times I've seen that call would be a player running off the field and not getting to the sideline fast enough.  If it was a player from the sideline standing on the field, that should be a sideline warning.
#14
Quote from: doolittledog on November 06, 2023, 01:28:06 PM
Quote from: DriftlessDuhawk on November 06, 2023, 12:53:18 PM
Quote from: doolittledog on November 06, 2023, 10:46:36 AM

Thank you MediaGuy.  Sometimes I figure I'm looking too closely as a fan and am not seeing things as a neutral would see it.  Your comments align with what I was seeing.  And the ref had barely got the words out over the PA and they all took off in a sprint to get out of thre.  To further note what I think what you were getting at, Dubuque sure seems to get personal foul penalties that other schools never seem to get called against them.  I'm talking about simple things like throwing your arms up in the air gets flagged.  Dubuque got a 4th quarter unsportsmanlike  penalty on a player talking to the ref at the same time a Coe player was at the Dubuque sideline taunting anyone near him while the rest of the Coe team was huddled up on their sideline. Coe didn't get flagged while Dubuque did.  It gets frustrating to see one team held to a different standard as others.

I can confidently tell you that the league office is very well aware of how ud plays the game of football and is actively looking for unsportsmanlikes and personal fouls. Not saying that it is every player in the program but they have developed a reputation over the years and the coaches in the rest of the league have voiced their opinions about the matter. I have heard from people at multiple schools in the league that they have been reached out to by the head official at the league office prior to playing ud saying that they will be calling the game tighter due to the nature of these games. Do with that information what you will...

Perhaps that explains the number of times I have watched an official staring at an opposing player taunting a UD player and when the UD player shoves them away a flag flies and UD gets penalized.  You can't have 2 sets of rules.  That is disturbing that the league office is doing this.       

Not trying to pick a fight here, but while I did say that I was critical of "how" the play got called on Saturday, I do think it was the right call.  As to your comment about having 2 sets of rules.  I have been around the ARC since the late 90's and I have only seen a few "unsportsmanlike" things that stand out.

I will preface this by saying I understand Wartburg's coach was ejected from a game while leading by 30+ points and I don't think that was very sportsmanlike, but Wartburg and their HC should have a little extra "monitoring" of the sideline to make sure those types of things don't happen again. 

Incident 1: Last play of first half of Wartburg game in 1999, Wartburg leading comfortably, and their starting QB was hit late out of bounds on Wartburg sideline.  General pushing and shoving ensues but is under control from 2 officials there...The ENTIRE opposing team left their sideline headed  to Wartburg's side of the field in what I can only assume is an effort to start a fight.  Coaches from both sides have to physically restrain players from a physical fight at halftime. 

Incident 2: Wartburg homecoming in 2012, Wartburg and visiting team play a tight game, which Wartburg wins on a missed field goal to end the game.  Afterwards, visiting head coach runs toward the locker room actively avoiding shaking hands with the Wartburg coaches.  Wartburg HC chases visiting coach down to shake hands, verbal confruntation ensues.

Both times the visiting team was University of Dubuque, under different head coaches, and possibly different Athletic Directors...so maybe there's a bit of an earned reputation that comes from the program as a whole and not just a hot-headed coach or player.
 
I'm sure there have been times in the past that other teams have thought that Wartburg, Central or Coe have had problems as well.  But when I chat with other people in the ARC...Coaches, SIDs, Media, (not fans) about who is the least disciplined, and sportsmanlike in the ARC, it seems that everyone I've talked to says UD. 

So wondering why UD seems to be treated differently, kind of sounds like the parents of the disruptive kid in class, blaming the school board for their kid always being sent to the principal's office. 

Maybe that kids needs a bit more discipline at home so the school doesn't have to do it for you.

Not trying to poke the bear, just giving you a non UD perspective.
#15
Quote from: doolittledog on November 05, 2023, 01:52:52 PM
Interesting game at Dubuque yesterday.  Game goes into overtime.  Dubuque makes a field goal to take a 3 point lead.  Dubuque makes a stop on 4th down to make what they thought was the winning stop.  After the players are all on the field celebrating, the officials throw a flag for illegal substitution.  On the next play, Coe running back gets tackled and fumbles.  The ball goes into the endzone and is recovered by Coe.  The official right there immediately signals the runner was down and motions for 2nd down.  The officials announce, the call on the field is the runner was down.  The officials then huddle, and come out of the huddle and say the call on the field is a Coe fumble, Coe recovers in the endzone, Coe wins.  Then the whole crew sprinted off the field. 

Devastating end to the game.  Even as a Dubuque fan, I think that was bad officiating.

I was watching that game on the internet and you could see the side judge make 3 separate calls on the last play.  It really reminded me of the interception/TD a few years back when the NFL officials were on strike.  I think in the end it was the right call, but it seems officials are in a hurry to make a signal instead of getting it right the first time.  The side judge first signaled touchback (waved his left arm up and down) saying the ball was fumbled out of the endzone.  then he immediately marked the spot of the fumble and signaled "2" with his hand calling it down at the 1 and 2nd down.  Then after a short officials meeting the referee ruled it a touchdown.

I think it is easier for the crowd to accept if you throw your beanbag to mark the spot of the fumble, then immediately meet as a crew to make sure you get the call right.  At least that way there isn't the emotional rollercoaster of going through 3 different calls.

And on a side note, I have officiated at the high school level in the past, and it seems like officials have such thinner skin than they had 10-15 years ago.  The rules used to be pretty simple, don't show up the officials, don't attack them personally, and don't use a few magic words.  Other than that you were good talking to an official from the sideline.  Also it seems like officials are waaaay to worried about the crowd than they should be.  When I officiated, I was barely aware there was a crowd at all, it's not my job to listen/react to them.  I've just noticed some officials looking over their shoulders at the crowd when they're getting critical or glaring at the pressbox if there is a scoreboard/clock issue. 

When it comes down to it, everyone has a job to do.  Players play, coaches put their kids in the best position to win (which includes riding the officials from time to time) and crowds support their team (with cheers or boos from time to time).  Its not always easy, but when everyone just does their job, we can all go home proud of a good game and with the respect earned.