Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2009, 10:30:12 PMHead Coaches do make more, but the assistants work for peanuts, believe me I know.
Not head coaches.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages1
#1
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 02, 2009, 08:51:53 AM #2
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 01, 2009, 10:10:10 PMQuote from: musupporter on October 01, 2009, 10:04:33 PM
Narch, thanks for the understanding. I think I may have been a little harsh and that led to a little mis understanding. I just want to see the level of play pick up. Man I love football and football coaches at this level. Kids playing for the pure love of the game and coaches doing what coaches do for what I assume is pay less glamerous than our friends in the bigger divisions. I just get a little wound up when I know things can be better. Mith the exception of the second half at Campbell, (speaking of Campbell, what a huge offensive line) MU has dominated the offensive stats and played respectable defense for the most part. But according to the stats, MU should be 2-1. The reason they are not is not one little thing. Its a combination of all those little things I was so upset about.
I am pulling for those guys every Saturday.
Coaches at this level don't make much. On average less than an entry level teacher at a high school
#3
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 01, 2009, 10:07:10 PMQuote from: musupporter on October 01, 2009, 09:52:52 PM
USA South Guru. You are correct. Probably could have held my tongue and let it go. Competetive nature just won't let me do it. To anyone I have offended, I apologize.
I fully understand what MU and its coaches do for the players. They do go out of the way to make sure our sons are succeeding in the classroom first, community second, and athletics last. Trust me. I appreciate that. It is the reason we attend MU. Especially Jim Sypult and Dave Eavenson.
Fact is this. It was questioning Saturdays game. It was not intended to question the MU program. Sorry for the confusion. Along with some of the not so positive things you pointed out, you failed to point out the positives that I included in other posts. MU has improved in many areas. You are right about one thing, they were 2-8 last year and have beaten a team they lost to last year.(They also lost to a team they beat last year) But it is primarily the same team from last year with more experience under their belt. It is exactly the same offense and at least 6 returning starters on defense. I think it is fair to expect more than a 1-2 record at this point.
With all that said, guess what I am doing tomorrow. Packing up and heading to Tennessee to support the MU Monarchs.
Again, i apologize for speaking without considering all angles.
Go Monarchs
Apology accepted! last thing is that you have to remember that Campbell is a 1AA program with a full spring practice in pads. It was no surprise that they got alot better in a year to me. Enyjoy the smokey mountains.
#4
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 01, 2009, 08:37:04 PMQuote from: musupporter on September 27, 2009, 09:20:01 AM
WOW. Almost 400 yards of total offense and only 3 points. MU was in the red zone 6 times and couldn't push it in. It was obvious what EH's game plan was. QB or #7 was gonna run the ball 90% of the time. Stevens (#&7) is a special kid. Too bad he doesn't have D1 size. Never watched a kid with that much heart. Alot of players should take note. So many reasons MU can't get it done. Dumb penalties, tipped balls, dropped passes, poor play calling, missed tackles, an elementary defensive package, no team unity, lack of hustle. This team seems to crumble with first sign of adversity. Something needs to change. Players? Coaches? Who knows. The biggest chnage would be in attitude. MU needs a winners attitude. It appears they have become accustomed to this destructive cycle they are stuck in. Who are the team leaders. Not in stats, but on the field, in the locker room, on the side lines? Are the MU coaches so controlling that they are not allowing the leaders to emerge or are there just not any leaders on this team? Has Syphult lost control? Surely he sees what is going on. In my degree program I took a class, Methodology of Instruction. The biggest one thing I took from that class is that if the whole class fails, then the material provided to the class was insuffecient. Could that be the case here? It is extremely painful to watch the Monarchs play at this level.
What part of this is not calling out or bashing the coaches. Read what you wrote.
#5
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 01, 2009, 08:22:51 PMQuote from: musupporter on October 01, 2009, 07:39:55 PM
USAGURU, slow down babe. Didn't mean to step on any toes. Thank you for being a supporter, tried and true. Let me clear up a couple things.
First, no one has bashed a coach. No one is calling for their jobs or even thinking of that. I have'nt even said the coaches are doing a poor job. But, without a doubt, in the EH game, there was some questionable play calling. Trust me, if you were there you would know that to be the truth. That is all that was discussed, questionable play calling and a desire to see some fire in this team from the top down. If that was interpreted as attacking the coaching staff, that was not my intent.
Second, I know what hours those coaches put in and, I am assuming, not for the kind of pay coaches in larger programs are accustomed to. Those coaches are there for the same reason most of the players who play on non-scholarship teams are there for - Love of the game.
Third, you may some new starters at linebacker but I don't recall mentioning a problem with the linebacking group. In discussion I merely suggested running a blitz package on obvious passing downs. That has nothing to do with being freshmen or 5th year seniors. For the record, I have been impressed with the linebackers to this point. Defensively, all four starters on the line are back as well as the second team line from last year. Your free safety moved there from linebacker, and you have 4 others with extensive playing time last year.
You cannot deny that with a group as talented as this, something is missing. I simply wonder what it is.
Trust me, I am not bashing anyone. Just questioning the current situation.
What is to question, to come on here and say this stuff is basically saying you don't trust the coaches.
Lets be honest this is not the most talented team in the USA SOUTH. I know you have a son playing for them and that is all the more reason not to be online saying this. This is a program that was 2-8 last year. They have already defeated a team they lost to last year. The one thing you must remember is that you can't do too much. You can say you want blitzing and ends dropping, but what you are not realizing is that its just not that easy. Yes you are playing young kids and they can not handle that much. Plus to do all of these things you have to practice all of it. I have coached at this level for a long time and doing too much will kill you. The one coaching philosophy we must remember is it that its better to be great at a little than average at alot. If you start blitzing can you cover man to man? Yes there are alot of players returning, but we must remember that the kitchen cabinents were not exactly full.
There are strides being made from last season. The running game has improved and sacks are down. Look at the positives. Remember it is not about the X's and O's once the game starts it is about the Johnny's and Joe's. You can sleep well knowing that the Monarchs will be well prepared just like they always are. It just blows my mind that a parent can come on a site like this and question a program his son is a part of. Especially after all they have done to help your son as much as they have through his college career.
#6
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 01, 2009, 06:35:59 PM
I'll be more than happy to let him grammer check it. He just should not do it during business hours. MU admin may frown upon that.

#7
Region 3 football (South Atlantic-ish) / Re: USA South Athletic Conference
October 01, 2009, 04:15:49 PM
Ok I've been associated with this conference for a longtime and have followed this board for years. This is my first post. I have followed the discussion of MU Supporter and others as to MU's early season struggles. Lets clear a few things up.
1. MU's Defensive scheme is not basic. That staff puts in more hours than most. I can assure you of that.
2. We must consider the fact that you have first year starters at Linebacker. There is a reason that there is a new LB coach at Methodist.
3. Questioning Coaches...... Jim Sypult has forgot more football than most people on this board will ever know. If you are a true supporter of the program you will support the players and coaches. What good as a parent does it do to bash the coaches on the internet. This staff is dedicated and works their butt off. most in the office by 5AM and not leaving until 8 at night.
It is very disappointing to read these things on hear.
1. MU's Defensive scheme is not basic. That staff puts in more hours than most. I can assure you of that.
2. We must consider the fact that you have first year starters at Linebacker. There is a reason that there is a new LB coach at Methodist.
3. Questioning Coaches...... Jim Sypult has forgot more football than most people on this board will ever know. If you are a true supporter of the program you will support the players and coaches. What good as a parent does it do to bash the coaches on the internet. This staff is dedicated and works their butt off. most in the office by 5AM and not leaving until 8 at night.
It is very disappointing to read these things on hear.
Pages1