Okay, I found an error myself. Coe can't clinch this week unless Central also loses, which is impossible since they're idle.

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: doolittledog on October 30, 2011, 12:14:29 AMAll that said...I really really really really want an outright title next weekend for my Spartans. I don't want to think of the tie-break possibilities if we end up with a 4 way title
Quote from: gordonmann on November 14, 2010, 04:55:00 PMNot surprised at all that Widener went for it. They had all the momentum and nothing to lose.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 11, 2010, 10:37:59 AM
Yep. Jon beat me to it.
Quote from: Schwami on November 11, 2010, 10:11:24 AMQuote from: Jon Morse on November 10, 2010, 10:18:27 PM
I've been looking for concrete information on this for a couple of weeks now, and now that I have it... well, it is a screwy tiebreaker, but don't the power rankings help determine the conference schedule for this year?
In that case, aren't they essentially using this tiebreaker as a proxy for conference SOS anyway?
Welcome to the boards Jon.
Your point is well taken. However, the power ranking basically assumes that each of the teams (1 through 9) will be in the same relative position of strength to each other from year to year. The result is that the SOS for a prior year effects what happens this year, and is not necessarily reflective of the actual conference SOS this year.
Quote from: Ryder16 on November 09, 2010, 10:23:43 PM
what does the 2007 team ( which likely has maybe 20 people still on team from '07 and 1 who contributed in '07) have to do with this year ?