Thanks WoostAr for the kind words. Based on your comments regarding Edwards I crunched the latest data (last time I did it was a couple of games ago). Here are the numbers for some of the CalTech players:
1) Murphy slows the game down and actually causes CalTech to score 2 ppg less when he is on the floor. But, when he is on the floor CalTech decreases opposition scoring by 18ppg... a net positive of 16ppg! Dr. Eslinger should find more PT for this young man.
2) Hogue does a nice job of increasing scoring by 4ppg and decreasing opposition scoring by 6ppg... a net of 10ppg.
3) Edwards increases scoring to the tune of 6.8ppg and (contrary to my previous message) decreases opposition scoring by 1.6ppg... a net of 8.4ppg.
4) Runkel decreases CalTech scoring by 2.5ppg but also decreases opposition scoring by 10.4ppg for a net 7.9ppg.
5) Emezie increases scoring rate a bit more than Edwards (7.3 to 6.8 ppg) but opposition is scoring 3.9ppg more when he is on the floor for a net positive of 3.4ppg.
Crunching game data, these are the 5 CalTech players which make the team stronger when on the floor.
1) Murphy slows the game down and actually causes CalTech to score 2 ppg less when he is on the floor. But, when he is on the floor CalTech decreases opposition scoring by 18ppg... a net positive of 16ppg! Dr. Eslinger should find more PT for this young man.
2) Hogue does a nice job of increasing scoring by 4ppg and decreasing opposition scoring by 6ppg... a net of 10ppg.
3) Edwards increases scoring to the tune of 6.8ppg and (contrary to my previous message) decreases opposition scoring by 1.6ppg... a net of 8.4ppg.
4) Runkel decreases CalTech scoring by 2.5ppg but also decreases opposition scoring by 10.4ppg for a net 7.9ppg.
5) Emezie increases scoring rate a bit more than Edwards (7.3 to 6.8 ppg) but opposition is scoring 3.9ppg more when he is on the floor for a net positive of 3.4ppg.
Crunching game data, these are the 5 CalTech players which make the team stronger when on the floor.