Quote from: Kuiper on November 19, 2025, 05:40:28 PMKuiper,Quote from: Sandon Mibut on November 19, 2025, 05:19:09 PMGood lord that is lame. I'm going to check in with some of my Midd (alum) friends to see if they have any additional info.
The team also had something like 50 cards this season.
According to the NCAA, Middlebury "only" had 41 yellows and 3 reds. Amherst had the most yellows in the NESCAC this year - 43 - but only 1 red.
I've found, however, that cards are often a function of the league/area of the country, each of which have different ref pools.
For example, Amherst was tied for #24 in the country for yellow cards with 43 and Middlebury was tied for #38 with 41, but check out the cards and national rankings for yellow cards among New Jersey schools:
#1 Drew 58 Yellows
#3 William Paterson 55
#4 FDU-Florham 53
Kean 53
#13 Montclair State 48
#15 Rutgers-Camden 46
#24 Rutgers-Newark 43
#44 Stockton 40
#52 New Jersey City 39
#114 Stevens 34
#149 Rowan 31
Given your wide and deep knowledge of D3 soccer, I'm hesitant to question your conclusions, but I will nevertheless in this instance. I don't know how long you've been watching D3 soccer. I've been a fan for 40 years. I gather you're based in the West; I'm based in the East. Both of those factors may bias my conclusions.
What I can tell you from the eye test over 40 years, is that the two conferences with the highest level of physical play overall are the NJAC and the NESCAC. Yes, they have more fouls called on them, and perhaps there's a regional refereeing factor. However, they actually commit (in both instances) many more fouls than are being called. Many more.
For example, lots of observers here would probably agree that (e.g.) Amherst just plays that way most of the time. Their players are apparently taught to foul people whenever physical contact will produce an advantage. If a foul is called, they still interrupted a play that could have (for them) a bad result. If a foul is not called, they get away with it. Rowan, formerly known as Glassboro State College, has played that way for decades--and, again, this is well known among observers here. When Messiah beat them in Glassboro for their first nattie (2000), the home fans were yelling at the officials all game long about the fouls being called against them. The officiating was spot on--early yellows for grabbing players as they ran past defenders, that sort of thing. After the game, David Brandt was asked about that in the press conference. His reply: those were fouls, and fouls are supposed to be called.
Now, don't get me wrong. Amherst and Rowan both consistently produce very talented teams that deservedly win a lot of games. They simply have styles of play that are more physical than most other teams. The conferences in which they play also have other teams in that category. If that happens routinely over many years--even for decades--you have to conclude that it originates with the coaching staff. And when conferences in general display those kinds of numbers consistently for many years, it wouldn't surprise me if the pool of referees gets used to seeing it and starts ignoring a lot of the "small stuff" and even some of the more serious infractions. They "let them play," as the saying goes.
Well that's more than my two cents, but then inflation happens and pennies are on their way into extinction.