Agreed Andrews was the best back Fisher saw this year and did go well over a 100. That said, I recall him breaking off a 50 or 60 yarder. This entire season I would say Fisher's biggest enemy was the "big play". Early on it was on the ground and as the season progressed it was through the air. That said, a great defense doesn't let those plays happen. Anyways, back to the original thought, Andrews did in fact have a day against a defense that shut down almost every other back in this conference, so hats off to him.

Agreed Andrews was the best back Fisher saw this year and did go well over a 100. That said, I recall him breaking off a 50 or 60 yarder. This entire season I would say Fisher's biggest enemy was the "big play". Early on it was on the ground and as the season progressed it was through the air. That said, a great defense doesn't let those plays happen. Anyways, back to the original thought, Andrews did in fact have a day against a defense that shut down almost every other back in this conference, so hats off to him.

I do like all the discussion about what Fisher's offense may and can look like next year. That said, I think the other side of the ball is where the discussion should be right now. 2 senior linebackers departing, one being a 3 year starter, another a 2 year starter and captain. All 3 safeties are departing, 2 having started the last 2 seasons, 1 of which was a captain for both. Those are huge holes to fill in a defense that led the conference this year, and aside from Salisbury and Alfred, held every rushing attack in check. I think we all can agree that this program knows how to reload, it will just be interesting to see how these players are replaced and how well this defense can continue to perform with a lack of experience.