10 freshmen on the much anticipated Carthage roster. Looks like a decent class coming in.
Was Carthage the last school to have their roster up?
Was Carthage the last school to have their roster up?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: kenoshamark on January 20, 2018, 11:49:30 PM
Red and Black,
Get back to the point...you said people close to the program know where my allegiances are. If you have some connections to the program then come clean....I've followed Carthage for many years and was a diehard fan for many years....I've been to more games than I can even begin to count. If you think I'm just going to say nice things all the time, well that ended a few years ago.
All I brought up was the point that it will be interesting to see how the roles for Perry and Johnson play out over the next few years.
Quote from: Gregory Sager on January 20, 2018, 11:34:05 PMQuote from: Red and black on January 20, 2018, 11:25:45 PMQuote from: kenoshamark on January 20, 2018, 11:05:22 PMQuote from: iwumichigander on January 20, 2018, 10:25:28 PMQuote from: iwu70 on January 20, 2018, 10:15:56 PMGreg is right. Both teams did a lot of running up and down the court. Augustana kept themselves in the game with defense.
As Greg has mentioned, it was a close game til the last 4 minutes. You can't say AC over-powered NPU, as they didn't, and Lake had a poor shooting day. If that's how the #10 team in the country is supposed to play, then I'm not terribly impressed. NPU is not exactly the powerhouse of the league this year, though they gave AC a pretty good game. IMHO.
CC comes back to win in Decatur, in OT, 91-82. I think MU ran out of gas.
Here we go in round two of the league -- down the stretch we go. IWU will obviously have their hands full with EC at home.
'70
Millikin should have won the game in regulation. Rarely does Bosko lose in an OT contest. I think Millikin just does not yet have five guys used to playing together as opposed to running out of gas. But watch out in the second half of the regular CCIW season as Millikin will get better. There is some talent on Millikin.
Happened twice this year already where Carthage lost in OT. Calvin College and IIT.
Mark it's okay to say nice things about your home town team every once in awhile. People close with the program understand where your allegiances are but come on.
Why are you getting on his case for setting the record straight?
Quote from: kenoshamark on January 20, 2018, 11:18:05 PMQuote from: kenoshamark on January 15, 2018, 07:19:42 PM
Greg,
Good comments about Baltimore being back in the lineup. I haven't been able to attend a game yet, but I have watched some of the games on line (at least partial amounts). Baltimore will have an impact and provides a real nice third scoring option (although he isn't shy about shooting so he might consider himself the first option now).
Johnson is an interesting prospect...he seems very composed on the floor and is certainly getting rave reviews from Bosko. In the Kenosha News on Sunday morning, Bosko was reiterating his previous comments about how smart he is, how hard he works, the sky is the limit and he will be a star some day.
What I wonder is how he will be used going forward this year and next. As you stated, they have 40 minutes to use in the post with Perry and Johnson, but who is going to get the key minutes in the future? Perry is probably a 25 minute player, but Johnson needs more minutes than 15. You can't really play them together from what I can tell. Maybe for a few minutes, but that experiment will probably be for the future as there isn't someone you are going to take out of the starting lineup down the stretch of a close game.
With Perry being the reigning freshman of the year, how do you give him the right number of minutes too? Bosko raved about him last year, but seems like it has switched to Johnson this year. Its a great situation to have, but I think it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
BTW, I can't believe Johnson didn't get some D2 looks....Now, maybe he did, but I would think there would be multiple teams at that level that could have used his size and shot blocking ability. Just seems like he would have been a natural to be a scholarship player...might have taken him a year or two to round into a full time player at that level, but worth the risk. Plus, he is supposed to be an outstanding student too and came from a top notch high school so he had to have been seen by bigger schools. I'm not convinced he isn't taller than Perry and they have Perry at 6"11 and Johnson at 6"10....
Nonetheless, great get for Carthage....
Posted this a few days ago....I see that Johnson started tonight and logged 30 minutes and Perry came off the bench and played 15 minutes. Not sure what this means for the remaining games in terms of who will be the starter.
Quote from: kenoshamark on January 20, 2018, 11:05:22 PMQuote from: iwumichigander on January 20, 2018, 10:25:28 PMQuote from: iwu70 on January 20, 2018, 10:15:56 PMGreg is right. Both teams did a lot of running up and down the court. Augustana kept themselves in the game with defense.
As Greg has mentioned, it was a close game til the last 4 minutes. You can't say AC over-powered NPU, as they didn't, and Lake had a poor shooting day. If that's how the #10 team in the country is supposed to play, then I'm not terribly impressed. NPU is not exactly the powerhouse of the league this year, though they gave AC a pretty good game. IMHO.
CC comes back to win in Decatur, in OT, 91-82. I think MU ran out of gas.
Here we go in round two of the league -- down the stretch we go. IWU will obviously have their hands full with EC at home.
'70
Millikin should have won the game in regulation. Rarely does Bosko lose in an OT contest. I think Millikin just does not yet have five guys used to playing together as opposed to running out of gas. But watch out in the second half of the regular CCIW season as Millikin will get better. There is some talent on Millikin.
Happened twice this year already where Carthage lost in OT. Calvin College and IIT.
Quote from: AndOne on August 17, 2017, 06:38:38 PMQuote from: Red and black on August 16, 2017, 11:25:55 PMQuote from: AndOne on August 16, 2017, 04:27:55 PM
nescac1,
I think when you base an analysis of something current on "how they finished last year," you might need to differentiate between how they finished with regard to what their total record was and how they fonished playing at the end of the year. North Central finished 18-11. Not that impressive overall. However, to only consider those numbers in assessing this season's team is, I believe, a bit shortsighted. Because equally important is how they finished playing near the end of the year. And, in NCC's case, they were playing some of their best basketball at season's end. Over the last 12 games they finished 9-3 with the 3 losses being a 6 point overtime loss to the national champion runner up (Augie), a 4 point overtime loss to the CCIW tourney #1 seed (Carthage), and a 1 point loss to Elite Eight member Hanover. Incidentally, they beat both Carthage and Augie in the conference tourney.
So, if you're asking if last year's record should be the primary factor in this year's assessment, my answers is no. I think how they were actually playing over the final part of the season is more important than their final record.
Lastly, just to be clear. There is no way in hell I was suggesting NCC should be the pre-season #1-3 team.
I agree with you that 4-7 is about right. The main thing is that, given the last time they played NCC won, the Cardinals shouldn't be more than one or two spots behind wherever Augie is placed.
Based off of this post, where do you have carthage? As you referenced they were the CCIW #1 seed. Have majority of key contributors back and as you pointed out is important, had a very successful finish to the year. They went 7-1 in the back half of the CCIW round robin Including wins vs Augie and their 2nd win against north central.
I could see north central 4-7 as well, but you would have to really convince me how they could be far ahead of Carthage.
First of all, I think that the failure of Carthage to finish in last season's final Top 25, or even in the ORV, will hurt their chances of being included in either category in this year's pre-season rankings, if that's what you're asking.
You mentioned that they were the #1 seed in the conference tourney, have several key contributors back, and finished well including a 2nd win against NCC before losing to them in the conference tournament. However, keep in mind that two other schools won as many conference games as they did, that they lost both their leading scorer and their (very underrated) leading assist guy, and that the game they really needed in the conference tourney got away (to NCC).
Pluses for the upcoming season include the possible further development of Brad Perry, the emergence of Kienan Baltimore as a future all-conference player, the all-around play of Brad Kruse, and the big shot making ability of Jordan Thomas. Questions needing consideration include who will assume the top scorer position, who will QB the team and get the ball to the shooters/scorers mentioned above, and did they recruit any newbie who will emerge as a significant contributor. Disappointment should reign if CC doesn't finish in the top four of the conference and qualify for the tournament. I can see CC and IWU being top contenders for the 3rd and 4th spots. If they can get into the national tourney and win a game there, final Top 20-25 or ORV ranking is possible.
Lastly, as a direct comparison between CC and NCC heading into this season, keep in mind that in addition to what they had last year NCC gets Connor Raridon back, adds a D2 transfer, adds another transfer who led his team in scoring and was 5th in conference scoring, and adds, among others, a super athletic freshman who is both explosive on the offensive interior and plays a smothering brand of defense, along with another freshman who finished second in scoring in DuPage County, a great provider of top level D3 talent. IDK what noteworthy additions CC is making which helps lead me to the conclusion that there is a rather large gap between where NCC is likely to be ranked pre-season, and where CC may be ranked.
Hope that answers your question.
Quote from: Greek Tragedy on August 17, 2017, 05:42:32 PM
River Falls
v Minn-Duluth
v Central
v Baldwin-Wallace at Wheaton IL
v DePauw or Wheaton IL
v Superior
v Hamline
v Carleton
v St. Thomas
@ Northwestern
v St. Olaf at Eau Claire
Quote from: AndOne on August 16, 2017, 04:27:55 PM
nescac1,
I think when you base an analysis of something current on "how they finished last year," you might need to differentiate between how they finished with regard to what their total record was and how they fonished playing at the end of the year. North Central finished 18-11. Not that impressive overall. However, to only consider those numbers in assessing this season's team is, I believe, a bit shortsighted. Because equally important is how they finished playing near the end of the year. And, in NCC's case, they were playing some of their best basketball at season's end. Over the last 12 games they finished 9-3 with the 3 losses being a 6 point overtime loss to the national champion runner up (Augie), a 4 point overtime loss to the CCIW tourney #1 seed (Carthage), and a 1 point loss to Elite Eight member Hanover. Incidentally, they beat both Carthage and Augie in the conference tourney.
So, if you're asking if last year's record should be the primary factor in this year's assessment, my answers is no. I think how they were actually playing over the final part of the season is more important than their final record.
Lastly, just to be clear. There is no way in hell I was suggesting NCC should be the pre-season #1-3 team.
I agree with you that 4-7 is about right. The main thing is that, given the last time they played NCC won, the Cardinals shouldn't be more than one or two spots behind wherever Augie is placed.
Quote from: markerickson on February 09, 2017, 09:36:09 PM
Attendance at last night's game in Kenosha was posted at 834, but having watched the game, that number was exaggerated by at least 500 people.
Quote from: 4samuy on January 08, 2017, 10:57:05 PMQuote from: Red and black on January 08, 2017, 04:37:52 PMQuote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on January 08, 2017, 11:23:39 AMQuote from: BeRightOn on January 08, 2017, 08:27:31 AM
Swarthmore has dominated its last two opponents, Catholic University and Gettysburg. I'm wondering if d-mac might re-instate them to his Top 25 ballot this week...
Them and 35 others teams are under consideration.
Nothing against the win(s), but I don't think much of a win over Catholic this year (they are average until proven otherwise) and Gettysburg is hot and cold. So, I really can't assess that until I look farther into it.
They have been on my radar much of the year... just not sure if those two games will stand out over other results once I start diving into the info.
Is Carthage College one of those 35 under consideration?
10-3 Overall, 4-1 and currently atop the CCIW standings.
Wins @ then #9 North Central (with a full and healthy team that included Connor Raridon)
@ UW-Oshkosh
@ #10 North Park University
Carthage has been playing well winning six out of last seven on the road. They did take a pretty good beat down at Augustana, however.
Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on January 08, 2017, 11:23:39 AMQuote from: BeRightOn on January 08, 2017, 08:27:31 AM
Swarthmore has dominated its last two opponents, Catholic University and Gettysburg. I'm wondering if d-mac might re-instate them to his Top 25 ballot this week...
Them and 35 others teams are under consideration.
Nothing against the win(s), but I don't think much of a win over Catholic this year (they are average until proven otherwise) and Gettysburg is hot and cold. So, I really can't assess that until I look farther into it.
They have been on my radar much of the year... just not sure if those two games will stand out over other results once I start diving into the info.