Yes!  It is a great "win" for Northeastern schools over the powers of the Mid-West.

While the game as statistically even I felt Gettysburg dominated the 1st half, particularly the mid-field, while the 2nd half favored F&M.   However, I felt Gettysburg was more threatening throughout the match and had more quality opportunities.   

Hello...I am new to these boards and really enjoy reading them during the basketball season.  Just a quick thought on NEC.  I think that they are very disciplined.  On defense even though they jump the lanes constantly opponents rarely have an open look because the other guys slide.    To keep up with their style of play they are probably short 1 or 2 more players off the bench. What they do is exhausting and I think in the 2nd half they get worn down.  I think they are also short on big men (no pun intended) as the rebounding numbers show.  If they had those two things they are probably un-defeated.   I think they play a similar style to Albertus Magnus.  Another team that is similar on a national level is Stephen F. Austin State which beat Duke with this this style of play about a week ago.