Top 25 discussion

Started by Pat Coleman, February 02, 2005, 12:01:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pat Coleman

Depends on the week. In this case, they were.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

ronk

#946
Quote from: sunny on January 05, 2010, 01:19:55 PM
By my quick count, there are three teams currently in the top 25 who have at least two wins against other teams currently in the Top 25: Illinois Wesleyan (4-0), Carthage (3-0), and Scranton (2-2).  (Special mention to Emmanuel, who is 1-1 against current Top 25ers and also has a win over Brandeis who missed the Top 25 by three points this week.)

Scranton is 3-2 having beaten Muhlenberg, Trinity, and UW-Whitewater.


EDITED to resolve a confusion with the quote.

sunny

Trinity is no longer in the Top 25.  I was referring to teams currently in the top 25, not those who were in it when the teams played.

rorurap

Strength of schedule is a great way to evaluate the Top 25.  But there are other factors.  A team's injury status or key player absence may not be recognized just by reading the scores and concluding that a team barely beat an "easy win" team.  For example, in Kean's win over Widener, Widener had a 12 point lead at half,  whoa what's going on here?  Whoops, Kean's best player rode the bench in the first half, played the second half, scored 10 points and Kean won by 9.
Marymount has had a proverbial "boot brigade" with  5 players in boots/on crutches in early games including Kathleen Brown, a preseason All American pick, missing the first 6 games including the Wesley game, and not starting until game 12.  If key players join a team after a few games that might also be missed by just reading the scores.  Again in Marymount's case, Tara Eddy, a defensive catalyst joined the team after the first semester and has really strengthened that team.  Comparing scores and margin of victory of common opponents is not reliable either.  For example, yesterday Illinois Wesleyen beat North Central by 14 while Marymount  beat the same team by 19.  Both winners cleared the bench and may have been trying different offenses/defenses/player combos or were just trying to keep some parents happy and turned larger wins into smaller ones.   

sunny

#949
Quote from: rorurap on January 06, 2010, 11:48:52 AM
Strength of schedule is a great way to evaluate the Top 25.  But there are other factors.  A team's injury status or key player absence may not be recognized just by reading the scores and concluding that a team barely beat an "easy win" team.  For example, in Kean's win over Widener, Widener had a 12 point lead at half,  whoa what's going on here?  Whoops, Kean's best player rode the bench in the first half, played the second half, scored 10 points and Kean won by 9.
Marymount has had a proverbial "boot brigade" with  5 players in boots/on crutches in early games including Kathleen Brown, a preseason All American pick, missing the first 6 games including the Wesley game, and not starting until game 12.  If key players join a team after a few games that might also be missed by just reading the scores.  Again in Marymount's case, Tara Eddy, a defensive catalyst joined the team after the first semester and has really strengthened that team.  Comparing scores and margin of victory of common opponents is not reliable either.  For example, yesterday Illinois Wesleyen beat North Central by 14 while Marymount  beat the same team by 19.  Both winners cleared the bench and may have been trying different offenses/defenses/player combos or were just trying to keep some parents happy and turned larger wins into smaller ones.    

In the case of Marymount, it's not simply the margin of victory at Wesley, it's that that was their only true road game.  I have them ranked highly and, obviously, they can't do any better than undefeated at this point.  My point is that when a team has played all of those home and neutral games and has not played anyone getting votes in the top 25, as a voter, I am going to penalize that team more when it does lose than I would a team like Illinois Wesleyan, who has played a much tougher schedule thus far. (Actually, the idea that Marymount is now healthier than they were earlier in the season could lend itself to the idea of giving them less of a free pass for one loss than if they lost when they had five players hurt ...)

Of course, Marymount will likely make the tournament, which means it will have a shot at the real prize, which has nothing to do with polls.  

I don't pay too much attention to common opponent scores or, especially, margin of victory over common opponents (unless Team A has absolutely blown out two or three teams that Team B needed OT to beat or something like that).  There is usually little difference - for evaluation purposes anyway - between a 14-point win and a 19-point win.

ronk

Quote from: sunny on January 06, 2010, 09:21:46 AM
Trinity is no longer in the Top 25.  I was referring to teams currently in the top 25, not those who were in it when the teams played.

  Understood - I didn't realize a new poll had been released before your statement.

Darryl Nester

How They Fared -- Midweek Report

Top 25

Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#1618Illinois Wesleyan12-0def. North Central (Ill.), 77-63; 01/09 vs. #11 Carthage
#2594Amherst11-0def. Wesleyan, 80-53; 01/09 at Williams
#3572Washington U.10-1def. Webster, 88-40; 01/09 vs. #21 Chicago
#4540Kean14-1def. Rowan, 85-47; 01/09 vs. #9 William Paterson
#5538Bowdoin9-001/07 vs. Bates; 01/09 vs. #23 Emmanuel
#6463Hope11-1def. Alma, 79-58; 01/09 at Kalamazoo
#7457Marymount13-0def. York (Pa.), 62-27; 01/09 at Salisbury
#8402Scranton8-2def. Albright, 56-48; 01/08 at Drew; 01/09 at Merchant Marine
#9369William Paterson14-0def. Widener, 59-40; 01/09 at #4 Kean
#10365Muhlenberg7-101/09 vs. Johns Hopkins
#11346Carthage11-1def. Wheaton (Ill.), 69-52; 01/09 at #1 Illinois Wesleyan
#12290George Fox9-2def. Pacific, 67-46; 01/08 at Whitman; 01/09 at Whitworth
#13288UW-River Falls13-0def. UW-Stout, 68-65 OT; 01/09 at #19 UW-Whitewater
#14258Thomas More10-101/07 at #36 Washington and Jefferson; 01/09 vs. Waynesburg
#15235Tufts11-1def. #23 Emmanuel, 57-51; 01/09 vs. Bates
#16227Mount Union12-1LOST to Baldwin-Wallace, 53-65; 01/09 vs. Otterbein
#17210Messiah10-1def. #37 Cal Lutheran, 66-62; 01/07 at Baptist Bible; 01/09 vs. Widener
#18198Moravian9-201/08 at Merchant Marine; 01/09 at Drew
#19194UW-Whitewater10-3def. Clarke, 82-53; 01/09 vs. #13 UW-River Falls
#20170Calvin11-101/09 at Trine
#21115Chicago8-301/09 at #3 Washington U.
#22105Louisiana College8-101/07 at Mary Hardin-Baylor; 01/09 at Concordia-Austin
#2390Emmanuel8-2LOST at #15 Tufts, 51-57; 01/07 vs. St. Joseph's (Maine); 01/09 at #5 Bowdoin
#2460Howard Payne10-2def. Sul Ross State, 65-51; 01/07 vs. Texas-Tyler
#2558UW-Stevens Point9-3def. UW-Oshkosh, 51-47; 01/09 vs. UW-La Crosse


Others receiving votes
Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#2655Brandeis7-3LOST to University of New England, 77-81; 01/09 at New York University
#2747Gettysburg11-0def. Swarthmore, 51-48; 01/09 at Washington College
#2845Christopher Newport11-0def. Shenandoah, 64-56; 01/09 at Mary Baldwin
#2942St. Benedict9-1def. St. Olaf, 66-40; def. Augsburg, 84-56; 01/09 at Concordia-Moorhead
#3040Puget Sound10-2def. Pacific Lutheran, 61-54; 01/08 vs. Willamette
#3127Simpson9-3LOST at Wartburg, 74-94; 01/09 vs. Loras
#3222Trinity (Texas)8-301/08 at Hendrix; 01/09 at Millsaps
#3321Mississippi College10-101/07 at Concordia-Austin; 01/09 at Mary Hardin-Baylor
#3419Lewis and Clark8-301/08 vs. Linfield; 01/09 at Pacific Lutheran
#3515St. Norbert7-2def. Beloit, 68-65; 01/09 at Ripon

sunny

Quote from: d3 new england fan on January 05, 2010, 08:07:20 AM
Messiah ahead of Emmanuel when Emmanuel beat them head to head on a neutral floor?

Emmanuel has played all comers this year and took a tough loss against Amherst who could be a strong Final Four entry.

Some of the rankings this year have looked so out of place.

Hats off to Emmanuel coming back from the tough loss to Tufts and the disappointing slip-up against St. Joseph's to knock off Bowdoin.  Have them penciled in at #19 (and there aren't any games today that should effect that).  Had them #14 last week, so dropping only five spots with a 1-2 week really isn't that bad.  Too bad about the St. Joseph's loss - really stings ... I probably would have them higher than last week if not for that.

I really can't see any choice for myself but to move Marymount up to No. 5 after some of the lopsided "showdowns" that occurred this weekend.  Still a bit suspect of that schedule, but holding York to 27 points isn't easily dismissed.  Game at Mary Wash this coming Saturday is, theoretically, their toughest test thus far. 

Bowdoin losing combined with what IWU, Kean, and Wash U did to Carthage, William Paterson, and Chicago, respectively, along with Amherst's continued dominance in the northeast, it will be interesting to see just how far ahead of the pack (vote-point wise) "the big four" are this week from everyone else. 

Kean dropping 102 on William Paterson and winning by 36 points against the previously-unbeaten Pioneers sure makes Scranton's 70-45 loss to the Cougars look a lot better!

Darryl Nester

How They Fared

Every score posted already!  That might be a new record.

Top 25

Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#1618Illinois Wesleyan13-0def. North Central (Ill.), 77-63; def. #11 Carthage, 76-48
#2594Amherst12-0def. Wesleyan, 80-53; def. Williams, 75-51
#3572Washington U.11-1def. Webster, 88-40; def. #21 Chicago, 63-34
#4540Kean15-1def. Rowan, 85-47; def. #9 William Paterson, 102-66
#5538Bowdoin10-1def. Bates, 52-49; LOST to #23 Emmanuel, 53-61
#6463Hope12-1def. Alma, 79-58; def. Kalamazoo, 80-51
#7457Marymount14-0def. York (Pa.), 62-27; def. Salisbury, 63-41
#8402Scranton10-2def. Albright, 56-48; def. Drew, 77-61; def. Merchant Marine, 69-55
#9369William Paterson14-1def. Widener, 59-40; LOST at #4 Kean, 66-102
#10365Muhlenberg8-1def. Johns Hopkins, 79-65
#11346Carthage11-2def. Wheaton (Ill.), 69-52; LOST at #1 Illinois Wesleyan, 48-76
#12290George Fox11-2def. Pacific, 67-46; def. Whitman, 60-49; def. Whitworth, 60-51
#13288UW-River Falls13-1def. UW-Stout, 68-65 OT; LOST at #19 UW-Whitewater, 62-76
#14258Thomas More11-2LOST at #36 Washington and Jefferson, 57-61; def. Waynesburg, 82-52
#15235Tufts12-1def. #23 Emmanuel, 57-51; def. Bates, 78-52
#16227Mount Union12-2LOST to Baldwin-Wallace, 53-65; LOST to Otterbein, 49-58
#17210Messiah12-1def. #37 Cal Lutheran, 66-62; def. Baptist Bible, 88-24; def. Widener, 74-39
#18198Moravian11-2def. Merchant Marine, 84-44; def. Drew, 86-60
#19194UW-Whitewater11-3def. Clarke, 82-53; def. #13 UW-River Falls, 76-62
#20170Calvin12-1def. Trine, 58-40
#21115Chicago8-4LOST at #3 Washington U., 34-63
#22105Louisiana College9-2LOST at Mary Hardin-Baylor, 44-53; def. Concordia-Austin, 78-58
#2390Emmanuel9-3LOST at #15 Tufts, 51-57; LOST to St. Joseph's (Maine), 47-60; def. #5 Bowdoin, 61-53
#2460Howard Payne11-2def. Sul Ross State, 65-51; def. Texas-Tyler, 101-56
#2558UW-Stevens Point10-3def. UW-Oshkosh, 51-47; def. UW-La Crosse, 88-76


Others receiving votes
Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#2655Brandeis8-3LOST to University of New England, 77-81; def. New York University, 73-68
#2747Gettysburg12-0def. Swarthmore, 51-48; def. Washington College, 79-63
#2845Christopher Newport12-0def. Shenandoah, 64-56; def. Mary Baldwin, 77-72
#2942St. Benedict9-2def. St. Olaf, 66-40; def. Augsburg, 84-56; LOST at Concordia-Moorhead, 56-68
#3040Puget Sound11-2def. Pacific Lutheran, 61-54; def. Willamette, 76-49
#3127Simpson10-3LOST at Wartburg, 74-94; def. Loras, 78-67 OT
#3222Trinity (Texas)9-4LOST at Hendrix, 51-57; def. Millsaps, 62-58
#3321Mississippi College11-2def. Concordia-Austin, 72-51; LOST at Mary Hardin-Baylor, 71-76
#3419Lewis and Clark10-3def. Linfield, 73-65; def. Pacific Lutheran, 74-62
#3515St. Norbert7-3def. Beloit, 68-65; LOST at Ripon, 61-62
#3611Washington and Jefferson11-2def. St. Vincent, 55-53; def. #14 Thomas More, 61-57; def. Westminster (Pa.), 65-51
#3710Cal Lutheran9-3LOST to #17 Messiah, 62-66; def. Claremont-Mudd-Scripps, 68-41; def. Caltech, 73-27
#386Southern Maine10-3def. Regis (Mass.), 74-59; def. Husson, 79-74 2OT; def. Mass-Dartmouth, 61-60
#393Case Western Reserve10-3LOST at Rochester, 52-62; def. Emory, 64-55

jumphigh

Why does Scranton have such a high ranking? 8th in the country with a 7-2 record, they always seem to have a high rank with an average record

Ralph Turner

#955
Quote from: jumphigh on January 10, 2010, 10:42:06 PM
Why does Scranton have such a high ranking? 8th in the country with a 7-2 record, they always seem to have a high rank with an average record
Scranton had a very good tourney in Las Vegas where they beat respected opponents on a neutral floor.

I know that Trinity TX is down a little this season, but the win over UWW is also solid.

The early season losses to Kean and Moravian bear watching.  Can Moravian sweep the series in the last regular season game?

Pat Coleman

Quote from: jumphigh on January 10, 2010, 10:42:06 PM
Why does Scranton have such a high ranking? 8th in the country with a 7-2 record, they always seem to have a high rank with an average record

It's occasionally instructive to look at who they've played.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

saratoga

jumphigh: As John McEnroe was known to say, "You can not be serious". High ranking with average records? Let me enlighten you.
These are Scranton's records from last year through 2000.
2009...26-5 (Elite 8).
2008...21-6 (NCAA).
2007...27-3 (Elite 8).
2006...31-2 (NCAA Final 4, 3rd. place).
2005...29-3 (NCAA Final 4, 4th. place).
2004...27-3 (Sweet 16).
2003...23-5 (NCAA 2nd. round).
2002...25-5 (NCAA 1st. round).
2001...20-5.
2000...26-5 (NCAA Final 4, 4th. place).
In addition to these "average" records, Scranton consistantly plays one of the toughest, if not THE toughest schedules in DIII year in & year out. Over a 10 year period they are averaging less than 4 losses per year.
I hope this gives you a bit more insight as to why a team with 2 losses may be ranked higher than a team with fewer.

sunny

Quote from: jumphigh on January 10, 2010, 10:42:06 PM
Why does Scranton have such a high ranking? 8th in the country with a 7-2 record, they always seem to have a high rank with an average record

With well over 400 teams in the Division, I would guess that, regardless of the statistical method used, an "average record" would be right around the .500 mark ...

Darryl Nester

How They Fared--Midweek Report

Top 25

Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#1620Illinois Wesleyan14-0def. Millikin, 64-42; 01/17 at Elmhurst
#2595Amherst13-0def. Clark, 87-44; 01/15 vs. Wesleyan; 01/16 vs. Connecticut College
#3570Washington U.11-101/15 vs. #32 Brandeis; 01/17 vs. New York University
#4559Kean16-1def. Richard Stockton, 63-51; 01/16 at Ramapo
#5500Marymount15-0def. Stevenson, 47-27; 01/16 at Mary Washington
#6498Hope13-1def. St. Mary's (Ind.), 91-72; 01/16 at Albion
#7443Scranton10-201/15 at Juniata; 01/16 at Susquehanna
#8419Bowdoin12-1def. William Smith, 74-58; def. Hamilton, 59-47; 01/16 vs. Colby
#9406Muhlenberg8-2LOST to McDaniel, 71-72 OT; 01/14 at #21 Gettysburg; 01/16 at Washington College
#10352George Fox11-201/15 vs. Willamette; 01/16 vs. Linfield
#11332Tufts12-101/15 at Williams; 01/16 at Middlebury
#12303Carthage11-3LOST to Elmhurst, 65-73; 01/16 at Augustana
#13297William Paterson15-1def. Rutgers-Newark, 74-36; 01/16 vs. Richard Stockton
#14267Messiah13-1def. Lycoming, 70-48; 01/16 vs. Alvernia
#15259UW-Whitewater12-3def. UW-Oshkosh, 76-64; 01/16 at UW-Eau Claire
#16253Moravian11-201/15 at Susquehanna; 01/16 at Juniata
#17248Calvin13-1def. Albion, 65-44; 01/16 at Adrian
#18243UW-River Falls13-2LOST to UW-La Crosse, 52-67; 01/16 vs. UW-Platteville
#19150Thomas More12-2def. Bethany, 78-71 OT; 01/16 vs. Thiel
#20122Christopher Newport13-0def. North Carolina Wesleyan, 84-29; 01/16 at Averett; 01/17 at Ferrum
#21120Gettysburg13-0def. Bryn Mawr, 83-34; 01/14 vs. #9 Muhlenberg
#22108Puget Sound11-201/15 vs. Whitworth; 01/16 vs. Whitman
#23102Howard Payne11-201/14 at Concordia-Austin; 01/16 at Mary Hardin-Baylor
#2498UW-Stevens Point12-3def. Edgewood, 61-47; def. UW-Platteville, 66-45; 01/16 at UW-Superior
#2584Emmanuel10-3def. Lasell, 67-35; 01/14 at Salem State; 01/16 at Suffolk


Others receiving votes
Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#2657Washington and Jefferson12-2def. Chatham, 53-50; 01/16 at Waynesburg
#2728Chicago8-401/15 vs. New York University; 01/17 vs. #32 Brandeis
#2818Mount Union13-2def. Muskingum, 70-58; 01/16 vs. Capital
#2917Lewis and Clark11-3def. Willamette, 61-40; 01/16 at Pacific
#3011St. Benedict10-2def. Hamline, 71-64; 01/16 vs. St. Thomas
#3110Southern Maine11-3def. Rhode Island College, 66-62; 01/16 at Eastern Connecticut
#329Brandeis8-301/15 at #3 Washington U.; 01/17 at #27 Chicago
#338Louisiana College10-2def. #36 Mississippi College, 68-53; 01/14 vs. Texas-Tyler
T#346Simpson11-3def. Buena Vista, 81-70; 01/16 vs. Coe
T#346St. Norbert7-301/15 vs. Knox; 01/16 vs. Grinnell
#364Mississippi College11-3LOST to #33 Louisiana College, 53-68; 01/16 vs. Texas-Tyler
#372DePauw11-301/15 at Hendrix; 01/17 at Millsaps
#381Cal Lutheran9-301/14 at La Verne; 01/16 vs. Occidental