FB: Northern Athletics Collegiate Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:04:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

7400West

                                                   CUCFB     CUWFB06
FIRST DOWNS...................               19       24
RUSHES-YARDS (NET)............       37-138   52-289
PASSING YDS (NET).............           117      137
Passes Att-Comp-Int...........       37-13-2   15-9-0
TOTAL OFFENSE PLAYS-YARDS.....74-255   67-426
Fumble Returns-Yards..........          0-0      0-0
Punt Returns-Yards............             1-0     2-18
Kickoff Returns-Yards.........           6-87     4-52
Interception Returns-Yards....        0-0      2-0
Punts (Number-Avg)............         4-36.8   3-37.0
Fumbles-Lost..................                0-0      2-2
Penalties-Yards...............               7-52     6-91
Possession Time...............            29:11    30:49
Third-Down Conversions........       5 of 18  3 of 11
Fourth-Down Conversions.......       2 of 4   1 of 2
Red-Zone Scores-Chances.......      3-3      4-6
Sacks By: Number-Yards........        5-38     2-20\


find me something that CUW did to CUC that is worthy of a playoff win later in the season!!!!!
Teamwork makes the Dream work!

mac_7_seven

Quote from: 7400West on October 16, 2006, 01:53:36 AM
regardless of the rest of the season you have to all admit that CUC has turned itself around!

A half of a season does not count as turing a program around.  I only know how we played @ Mac but they went 6-4 the year before I got there and all they could talk about is how we have turned the corner.  We went 3-7 the next year.  They may have taken a step in the right direction but ease up with all the love.  It will take 2-3 solid classes before they can say they have turned this program around.  My guess is that CUW did not take CUC very serious and then found themselves in a tight game.  You play that game 10 times and I would bet 8 of them are 20+ pt wins for CUW.

wlcalum

Being an outsider... and looking at the stats posted above, besides for the rushing yardage, looks to me like it was a great game!! Now you can tell me to shut up and go back to the MIAA board.  :)

Cougswillwin

To clear up the issue of them (CUW) not playing thier starters...

Their defensive starters were in the game at the begining of the game.  They played a soft cover 3 to our trips and could not stop our passing game.  After that, they played nickel and dime defenses the rest of the game, using 6 defensive backs and playing a cover 2 man instead of thier normal 3 linebackers and playing thier normal 4-3 cover 2.  

I just wanted to clear that up about them not playing thier starters, because they were having trouble with our passing game, so they had to put in 6 DB's.
"And when the roosters are crowing and the cows are spinnin circles in the pastures........DUCKS FLY TOGETHER!"

TruCountry95

I don't know where even to begin.   Exciting weekend if your at the bottom of the conference and playing for respect (CUC) or even your first win(EU). Major congrats to CUC for playing an awesome game and walking in their and showing that football is football and it's how its played just because you may be ranked some place in some poll doesn't mean you can't get beat in IBC play.  That's such bull about starters not playing and crap don't even believe that for one second CUC. Lakeland had the same excuses when GC played them last year really close.  See stuff like this is why CUW will get crushed in the playoffs. Instead of just taking it and saying CUC played really well they caught us off guard and played football, CUW made crap up about starters not starting or not playing and they never were worried about anything which would be a bold face lie. There's a line between confident and cocky and CUW is appears to be walkin it.  
-Also EU well played game, you guys played aggressive.  Hopefully GC learns from that and brings the new knowledge in for Homecoming game vs MacMurray this week.    
-I thought BU would win this one but they didn't. Congrats to AU.

langston92

I knew there were some gay people in this conference!  Cuc did improve but we got the W and thats what count.  I don't care really that much about stats.  As long as I am concerened the score on sat. was 31-20.  We won and you lost.  We are 7-0.  Yeah cuc came out with some gay formations and we took them for granted, but we got on ouor horse and we put it to them.  By the way you can say what you want on this gay board but see me on the field, then we will see whats up.  AND HAVE A NICE DAY;  ;D

TruCountry95

I think I did see you on the field and if you are who I think you are then yep......I laid your ass out twice! 

baseman201

Wow, abundant use the of the word "gay" Mr. Langston.

The fact of the matter is you got killed up front and then cried to the refs if you couldn't do anything, "Come on, he's holding me ref" was one of your most popular complaints on Saturday, or so I hear.......

Seeing how you post on the board I am surprised you didn't say, "ref, this is gay" or "ref, quit being gay and call something" or maybe "HEY REF........this is gay".

Alright, I for one think players shouldn't post on the board, and looking at your name, we all know who you are and who you play for.  You could of at least been secretive about your name.  Gay formations or not they gave you a run for your money and you just barely pulled it out.

You know if someone had no idea what the IBC was and looked at the scores and stats from Saturday, I am betting they would think that any team had a legitimate shot at the IBC title from how close all the games were. 

I still think CUW wins out and makes the playoffs, just don't know about winning their first playoff game anymore.


Cougswillwin

"And when the roosters are crowing and the cows are spinnin circles in the pastures........DUCKS FLY TOGETHER!"

FatalImpact

I said CIW was slackin'.....I didn't mean they didnt play their starters..SO I know it wasnt me who said that,... When I said slackin' I meant the were probably looking past CUC.....Cause that's what this conference does.....and Langston92 is right CUW got the W.....All those stats dont mean crap the next week,....New game New team.....
Aurora Football 24/7 365

TruCountry95

who cares, one more year and this conference is done.   Then teams can really prove things without the black cloud of playing in the IBC. Here's a question......If CUW was already in the new conference does anyone think they would have broke into the D3football Poll Top 25 already? or maybe sooner than they did with the ACPA poll?

Pat Coleman

Way to impress the All-American voters, Bobby.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

FatalImpact

Quote from: TruCountry95 on October 16, 2006, 11:11:10 AM
who cares, one more year and this conference is done.   Then teams can really prove things without the black cloud of playing in the IBC. Here's a question......If CUW was already in the new conference does anyone think they would have broke into the D3football Poll Top 25 already? or maybe sooner than they did with the ACPA poll?

NO

I think the new conference starts next year.....Not sure though
Aurora Football 24/7 365

FalconsFootball

CUC played an awesome game!!!
It is true that a couple starters were out, but you know what, that does not take one hting away from CUC. 

I think this was the best thing that could have heppened for both teams CUC knows how much better they are getting and can tell by playing tough competition,  CUW knows they aren't invincable anymore WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!

I think there are a number of top 25 teams that CUW can beat in the playoffs, they just have to hope they get matched up against one of them for once.  There is some great talent on CUW and they can get it done just be smart, you know who I'm talking to.

Awesome job CUC keep up the improvment. 

CUW take it to Lakeland!!!!

FalconsFootball

RIP CORCODILE HUNTER[/glow]

that was a terrible comment