FB: Conference of New England

SullyMustGo · October 04, 2005, 09:01:35 PM

As everyone can see there is merit to what I've been saying by all the responses of past players. But nothing is gonna get done by us pointing how bad he is out to eachother, things need to be taken to the administration. How to do that I don't know.

Jonny Utah · October 04, 2005, 09:16:54 PM

sullymustgo do you have the lowest kharma on d3football.com

?

fram_ram · October 04, 2005, 09:58:22 PM

Hey guys there 2-2, have been working hard, finally have a solid core of more then 22 guys and are very young. lets give them some support and realize that even though you x-players are angry and bitter with Sully, bury it and show the present players some support...

GO RAMS!!! and BEAT WORCESTER ST.

SullyMustGo · October 04, 2005, 10:17:38 PM

I have all the support in the world for you players. Lets get real here. That MIT team and Mass Maritime were the weakest they've been in over 5 years. If you guys win a 3rd game my hats off to you and Sully deserves one more year. If you go 2-7 he should not be hired back. Good Luck against Worcestor.

fram_ram · October 04, 2005, 11:00:55 PM

it is rumored that sully got a two year extention and as a current player, i am happy that he will be here!!!!! he told you guys when he got here it was going to be a 4-7 year transition and that is exactly what is going on here. its now his 4th year and we have won two games and look as if we are going to win a couple more. if you go to the games then you will see that the team is stronger, faster, and performing more like a cohesive unit, something it hasn't looked like the past couple of years. now im sorry you didnt have the chance to feel the type of success that this years team is now feeling but dont for one minute think you can take any of that feeling away from these guys. they worked hard for this and we will show all of you former alum and others that dont believe in us that this team is for real!!!

SullyMustGo · October 04, 2005, 11:25:56 PM

I want you guys to succeed but it is not happening under Sully. You guys won 2 games, but you also got absolutely destroyed in the other two games. Who are the other possible games for you guys to win. No disrespect but you have nothing but tough games left. Your two cupcakes are over and done with.

63Center · October 05, 2005, 07:17:34 AM

In regards to Fram_Ram comments, I saw Framingham play EC this year and there appeared to be a lot more players playing for the Rams this year and they appears to play better. However I have also seen some of the other teams and have to agree with SullyMustGo, that the easy games are over and I can't see the Rams winning any more games this season. It is great to hear some positive comments out of the current players and I wish you success.

SullyMustGo · October 05, 2005, 09:35:29 AM

Don't let those comments by fram_ram fool you 63center, they're the same Framigham players that have been cursing Sully out the past 2-3 years. On another note like i mentioned in a post a while back, i mentioned that Framingham will probably go 2-7 this year and the team will think its a big success. That I think is the sad thing about Sully and that program. I dont care what team you play for, a 2-7 team is unacceptable. You can't settle for 2-7. Framingham needs to strive for a 5-4 season to gain respect around the league. 2-7 gets them no where. Once they hit that .500 mark then their gaol should be the NEFC championship. Current players and former players of Framingham please stop embarrassing ourselves by thinking a 2-3 win season is good, other teams laugh at that.

63Center · October 05, 2005, 06:25:41 PM

SullyMustGo, at least the Rams can take some consolation in the Quality of Wins rankings listed on D3football.com. The Rams are listed at 125 while some of the other NEFC are listed much lower: Westfield 140, WNEC 155, MIT 178, Nichols 187 , UMD 207, and MIT 208. Of course to show how meaningful these numbers are, Trinity (CT) has a 0 score even tough they are one of the top teams in the East. Go Figure.

Jonny Utah · October 05, 2005, 06:34:31 PM

Trinity has a 0 score because they dont play nonleague opponents and cannot be rated and I believe Pat C. stated once that they dont even bother ranking them because of that.

And a 4-7 year plan? I dont know if I can buy that one unless the administration promised the coaches full time jobs in the future or something like that.

63Center · October 05, 2005, 06:38:28 PM

My picks for the week.

Curry 42 @Salve 7 This should be a relatively easy game for Curry

WSC 50 @Framingham 6 Need I say more.

ME Maritime 21 @BSC 18 This could be the game of the week in the NEFC. I give the nod to ME because I think this could be their year, even though I didn't pick them high in my early season rankings.

FSC 35 @EC 10 EC has to prove themselves against tough competition. They struggled last week against UMD which is having a bad year. The FSC defense by all accounts is extremely tough. EC has a good running game and a good defense, but I think that FSC is still the better team and has shown it with some of their quality wins.

UMD 21 @ Nichols 10 This is the week that UMD gets one in the "W" column. They are starting to gel as a young team and have played some pretty tough teams so far in Merrimack, Curry, and EC.

Westfield 35 @MA Maritime 6 Westfield needs to get back on the winning track and this should do it.

WNEC 35 @MIT 10 WNEC has a good team, and has lost some close games. Now that they have a win under their belts they are ready to roll.

63Center · October 05, 2005, 06:41:11 PM

JohnnyUtah, I know that Trinity has a 0 score because they don't play non-league games. That's what I'm saying that the Quality of WIns rankings mean little, but if you are a team like Framingham you might be happy to see yourself rated higher than other better teams, at least for a while.

Jonny Utah · October 05, 2005, 06:57:02 PM

yea but you said the numbers are meaningless and then mentioned trinitys 0 score....I think the numbers arent great but they arent meaningless.

Pat Coleman · October 05, 2005, 08:56:31 PM

Since the numbers are used only by the NCAA in the playoff selection process it doesn't seem to make sense to run numbers for the NESCAC.

boobyhasgameyo · October 05, 2005, 09:07:34 PM

Yeah I was just checking out the bored, and I was always curious.... Why doesn't the NESCAC go to the NCAA's, has it always been that way? Why do they only play teams in their conference? Hamilton is a 10 minute drive from Utica, they could play a little bit. Just wondering what the deal is....