2012 Division III NCAA Tournament

Started by Ralph Turner, August 29, 2005, 06:56:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jmccloskey

Maybe it's just me, but as long as you have 59 teams going to the tournament, why not just bump it up to a full field of 64 and eliminate all bye teams and play-ins?

smedindy

JM - That would make too much sense...
Wabash Always Fights!

Ralph Turner

Please post the hyperlink to the Handbook.

I thought that there would be one more ranking on Selection weekend that will be used in the process.

Actually the 59 team format probably saves the NCAA a Plane Flight, not a bus ride.

bbald eagle

In a game that keeps stats so precisely, you'd think the number 64 would seem obvious to the NCAA.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)

I posted the link in my second post on the handbook below, but here it is again.

Even if is were just a couple of bus rides, its still more than the NCAA wants to dish out for a tournament on which they lose money.

Yeah, about the geographic regions, the NCAA added those extra conferences to the official list, but it appears that they have actually been doing it that way for a while.  It also appears that the SCAC and the ASC are both totally within the bounds of the South region and don't need that consideration anyway.  Odd.
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

Titan Q

Hoops Fan, thank you for your breakdown.  So, if I have this straight...

* Thurs 3/2: 5 games played - winners face the 5 bye teams on Sat 3/4

* Fri, Sat 3/3 & 3/4: 11 4-team tounaments (each at one designated location) with the 11 winners advancing to Sectional

* Sat 3/4: Winners of Thursday games @ bye teams - 5 winners advancing to Sectional

* Fri, Sat 3/10 & 3/11: Sectional as we are used to them - 4 winners advancing to Salem


Do I have this correct?

I haven't had a chance to digest this yet, but I think the 11 4-team tournaments will be kind of cool.  I'm sure it will really be a "tournament atmosphere."  Will also give fans a chance to see another game.

I just wish we could get a full 64 and have 16 4-team tournaments on the first weekend.

 

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)


Yeah, you got it right.  Other than the fact that I coined the term "mini-tournaments" and although its exactly what they are, I'm sure the NCAA would frown on it.  Therefore, I encourage everyone to use it, especially when the D-I tournament gets going, it is nothing but 21 "mini-tournaments" in its own right.

I do like tha fact that the NCAA is admitting to seeding and even told us how to figure out the higher seeds once we get to sectionals.

I assume from the handbook though, that the seeding will only be within each "mini-tournament" so we could still end up with four of the five best teams playing for one final-four slot, but at least we'll know who the underdog is.
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

Pat Coleman

I just figured we would call these regionals again, like they used to be called, leading to sectionals and final four. :)
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Pat Coleman

As for 64, we'll get there eventually, when we approach 416 eligible D-III schools. It could be in less than a decade.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)

Pat, any word on the proposal to cap post-season tournaments in all NCAA sports at all levels at 64?  I know this was brought up sometime this summer, but I'm not aware if it was made into an official proposal or anything.  It interested me then, but I can't find any information on it currently.  I wonder if that would do away with the "play-in" game for the D1 tourney?
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

Pat Coleman

I expect that will be a done deal, but I don't think it has passed through all the 'how a bill becomes a law' stages yet.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)

Oh I'm only a bill, only a bill... sitting here on capitol hill
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

David Collinge

[APPLAUDS the timely use of Schoolhouse Rock]

Knightstalker

#28
Slight correction, it goes:
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill and I'm sitting here on capitol hill

Here is a link with all the different song lyrics if anyone needs a refresher.
Schoolhouse rock

"In the end we will survive rather than perish not because we accumulate comfort and luxury but because we accumulate wisdom"  Colonel Jack Jacobs US Army (Ret).

Coach C

Can I tell you how disappointed i was when I bought the Schoolhouse Rock DVD collection for my son and he HATED it?

As for the 64 team cap, I expect it to be proposed officially at the winter NCAA convention and it will pass.

As for the logic behind the brackets and byes and pairings and the rest... they went with the new ratio and come hell or high water they were going to make 59 work.  it's a complete and total disaster, but WTF did you expect from our dear friends in Indy?