FB: Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:19:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

bleedpurple

Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 04, 2015, 09:41:03 PM
Quote from: emma17 on October 04, 2015, 06:25:16 PM
UWO vs UWW has the look of a late round playoff game.
I don't imagine UWO will be very impressed w the game tape of the UWW offense vs UWP.

Hard to argue with either of those statements.

Where's Wally? I'm sure he'll find a way.  ;D

BoBo

Quote from: bleedpurple on October 04, 2015, 09:52:18 PM
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 04, 2015, 09:41:03 PM
Quote from: emma17 on October 04, 2015, 06:25:16 PM
UWO vs UWW has the look of a late round playoff game.
I don't imagine UWO will be very impressed w the game tape of the UWW offense vs UWP.

Hard to argue with either of those statements.

Where's Wally? I'm sure he'll find a way.  ;D

Found him...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BT-onzT5TcM
I'VE REACHED THAT AGE
WHERE MY BRAIN GOES
FROM "YOU PROBABLY
SHOULDN'T SAY THAT," TO
"WHAT THE HELL, LET'S SEE
WHAT HAPPENS."

MasterJedi

It appears UWW is kryptonite to UWP's offense and especially to Kelly QB's. Don't like anyone getting hurt but UWW has knocked them out of the game twice in different years.

NewHawk

Quote from: badgerwarhawk on October 04, 2015, 11:39:27 AM
Oshkosh had over 800 net yards of offense yesterday.  I don't care who you're playing that's OMG yardage.  I knew they'd be able to score against the Blue Devils but I never expected they'd be able to put up that kind of yardage.
While I don't think they can get that many yards against UWW defense, it is obviously important for the UWW offense to find a way to put more than 17 on the scoreboard next week.

MasterJedi

Quote from: NewHawk on October 05, 2015, 10:15:15 AM
Quote from: badgerwarhawk on October 04, 2015, 11:39:27 AM
Oshkosh had over 800 net yards of offense yesterday.  I don't care who you're playing that's OMG yardage.  I knew they'd be able to score against the Blue Devils but I never expected they'd be able to put up that kind of yardage.
While I don't think they can get that many yards against UWW defense, it is obviously important for the UWW offense to find a way to put more than 17 on the scoreboard next week.

Maybe, maybe not. It all depends on what the UWW defense can do. Theoretically they could hold them to 7 points again like they did last year. UWO offense is good but so was UWP's and they were held mostly in check.

Have to remember, last year was also a 17-7 ugly win over UWP too and it was a slobberknocker 24-7 win over UWO. They're quality teams, they won't be blown out or be easy wins. WIAC defenses (at least for the top teams) are good and not built like other conferences defenses outside of a few other schools.

02 Warhawk

Quote from: MasterJedi on October 05, 2015, 10:31:11 AM
Quote from: NewHawk on October 05, 2015, 10:15:15 AM
Quote from: badgerwarhawk on October 04, 2015, 11:39:27 AM
Oshkosh had over 800 net yards of offense yesterday.  I don't care who you're playing that's OMG yardage.  I knew they'd be able to score against the Blue Devils but I never expected they'd be able to put up that kind of yardage.
While I don't think they can get that many yards against UWW defense, it is obviously important for the UWW offense to find a way to put more than 17 on the scoreboard next week.

Maybe, maybe not. It all depends on what the UWW defense can do. Theoretically they could hold them to 7 points again like they did last year. UWO offense is good but so was UWP's and they were held mostly in check.

Have to remember, last year was also a 17-7 ugly win over UWP too and it was a slobberknocker 24-7 win over UWO. They're quality teams, they won't be blown out or be easy wins. WIAC defenses (at least for the top teams) are good and not built like other conferences defenses outside of a few other schools.

I'm so glad you added these last few words or else posters from other boards would have lit up this thread like a christmas tree (Wally, Oz, retagent, etc....)  ;D

ScreamingEagles

Not tough enough? UW-L falls to River Falls in OT

http://lacrossetribune.com/sports/not-tough-enough-uw-l-falls-to-river-falls-in/article_5b4b20f9-c8b4-5519-9e73-11c0b817f637.html

QuoteIn the end, it was about toughness. Toughness was the UW-La Crosse football team's mantra all week. The tougher team would win the game, the players and coaches said. UW-River Falls showed Saturday that it's a pretty tough team by the way it finished off a 21-20 overtime victory over the Eagles at Ramer Field.

Eagles' problems are front and center

http://lacrossetribune.com/sports/eagles-problems-are-front-and-center/article_28c0b766-37cb-5f79-8215-3715027cb3f9.html

QuoteThe point is this — with the present state of UW-L's offensive line play, they're severely limited. The lack of movement up front forced head coach Joel Dettwiler to give up on the running game: the Eagles ran the ball just 11 times and lost 26 yards on those attempts Saturday after entering with an average of 30 rushes per game.
UW-La Crosse

ScreamingEagles

#39757
Another disappointing weekend for the Eagles.  We really needed to put together a solid game to gain some confidence and did not get that done.  I did not have a chance to watch this game, but as usual the stats tell the story.

UWL Kicker misses a go-ahead 27 Yard field goal with 3:54 left in the 4th.
UWL Kicker has extra point blocked in overtime to win the game. (I have no idea if this was a low kick/poor blocking/etc)

233 Total Yards of Offense (UWRF - 360)
-26 Net Yards Rushing (UWRF - 178)
18:39 TOP (UWRF - 41:21)
7 Sacks by the UWRF Defense
18 Total Tackles by UWL Sophomore Safety Ryan Weber.  Weber has 61 tackles through 4 games.

Box Score
http://uwlathletics.com/custompages/Football%20Stats/2015stats/uwl4.htm
For some reason the box score doesn't show sack stats (they were counted as TFL's) but the newspaper article reported them.
UW-La Crosse

Just Bill

#39758
Quote from: fredfalcon on October 03, 2015, 10:32:07 AM
UWRF did not replace the retired sports info guy but gave his duties to others on the athletic staff, so their time to devote to previews has evidently dissipated.

Both Platteville and River Falls are operating without a full-time SID this year and their coverage has suffered from it.

Quote from: Just the stats on October 04, 2015, 12:29:27 PM
So that makes two schools (Platteville the other) without SIDs anymore. Kind of sad in this conference, but given the budget cuts, it's hard to justify keeping an SID and cutting a math professor.

True enough in the short term, but cut enough of your marketing and communications positions and pretty soon you won't have the students to fill that math professor's classroom anyway. It's a delicate balancing act.
"That seems silly and pointless..." - Hoops Fan

The first and still most accurate description of the D3 Championship BeltTM thread.

KitchenSink

Quote from: ScreamingEagles on October 05, 2015, 10:52:35 AM
Another disappointing weekend for the Eagles.  We really needed to put together a solid game to gain some confidence and did not get that done.  I did not have a chance to watch this game, but as usual the stats tell the story.

UWL Kicker misses a go-ahead 27 Yard field goal with 3:54 left in the 4th.
UWL Kicker has extra point blocked in overtime to win the game. (I have no idea if this was a low kick/poor blocking/etc)

233 Total Yards of Offense (UWRF - 360)
-26 Net Yards Rushing (UWRF - 178)
18:39 TOP (UWRF - 41:21)
7 Sacks by the UWRF Defense
18 Total Tackles by UWL Sophomore Safety Ryan Weber.  Weber has 61 tackles through 4 games.

Box Score
http://uwlathletics.com/custompages/Football%20Stats/2015stats/uwl4.htm
For some reason the box score doesn't show sack stats (they were counted as TFL's) but the newspaper article reported them.

I think the team's preparations took a big hit because all of the student athletes were busy reading the Drake Hall Director email.

WOW.  :o   :o   :o  http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/uw-la-crosse-hall-director-reprimanded-for-email-on-orgasms-b99590429z1-330725971.html
What the hell was that?  That was a Drop-kick.  Drop-kick? How much is that worth?  Three points.  THREE POINTS?!

emma17

Quote from: MasterJedi on October 05, 2015, 10:31:11 AM
Quote from: NewHawk on October 05, 2015, 10:15:15 AM
Quote from: badgerwarhawk on October 04, 2015, 11:39:27 AM
Oshkosh had over 800 net yards of offense yesterday.  I don't care who you're playing that's OMG yardage.  I knew they'd be able to score against the Blue Devils but I never expected they'd be able to put up that kind of yardage.
While I don't think they can get that many yards against UWW defense, it is obviously important for the UWW offense to find a way to put more than 17 on the scoreboard next week.

Maybe, maybe not. It all depends on what the UWW defense can do. Theoretically they could hold them to 7 points again like they did last year. UWO offense is good but so was UWP's and they were held mostly in check.

Have to remember, last year was also a 17-7 ugly win over UWP too and it was a slobberknocker 24-7 win over UWO. They're quality teams, they won't be blown out or be easy wins. WIAC defenses (at least for the top teams) are good and not built like other conferences defenses outside of a few other schools.

Slobberknocker sure is accurate, for this past weekend too.
Vs UWP the other day, UWW gained 299 total yards and gave up 263 yards.  UWW gained 150 rushing at 3.5 yds per carry, which seemed more like 1.5 yds per carry.
Vs UWO last year, UWW gained 297 total yards and gave up 263 yards.  UWW gained 122 rushing yards at 3.3 yds per carry, which also seemed more like 1.5 yds per carry.

Credit to UWO and UWP for putting together excellent game plans.   


02 Warhawk

Quote from: emma17 on October 05, 2015, 03:59:18 PM

Credit to UWO and UWP for putting together excellent game plans.

Absolutley.

If there was ever a team that is capable of grinding out a victory, it's Whitewater. They don't need flash to win.

badgerwarhawk

Quote from: KitchenSink on October 05, 2015, 03:49:05 PM
Quote from: ScreamingEagles on October 05, 2015, 10:52:35 AM
Another disappointing weekend for the Eagles.  We really needed to put together a solid game to gain some confidence and did not get that done.  I did not have a chance to watch this game, but as usual the stats tell the story.

UWL Kicker misses a go-ahead 27 Yard field goal with 3:54 left in the 4th.
UWL Kicker has extra point blocked in overtime to win the game. (I have no idea if this was a low kick/poor blocking/etc)

233 Total Yards of Offense (UWRF - 360)
-26 Net Yards Rushing (UWRF - 178)
18:39 TOP (UWRF - 41:21)
7 Sacks by the UWRF Defense
18 Total Tackles by UWL Sophomore Safety Ryan Weber.  Weber has 61 tackles through 4 games.

Box Score
http://uwlathletics.com/custompages/Football%20Stats/2015stats/uwl4.htm
For some reason the box score doesn't show sack stats (they were counted as TFL's) but the newspaper article reported them.

I think the team's preparations took a big hit because all of the student athletes were busy reading the Drake Hall Director email.

WOW.  :o   :o   :o  http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/uw-la-crosse-hall-director-reprimanded-for-email-on-orgasms-b99590429z1-330725971.html

RTFLMAO, this really too freakin' funny.  What possessed that dude?   I'm glad I wasn't drinking something when I read this or I would have spit it all over this computer. 
"Strange days have found us.  Strange days have tracked us down." .... J. Morrison

ScreamingEagles

Quote from: KitchenSink on October 05, 2015, 03:49:05 PM
Quote from: ScreamingEagles on October 05, 2015, 10:52:35 AM
Another disappointing weekend for the Eagles.  We really needed to put together a solid game to gain some confidence and did not get that done.  I did not have a chance to watch this game, but as usual the stats tell the story.

UWL Kicker misses a go-ahead 27 Yard field goal with 3:54 left in the 4th.
UWL Kicker has extra point blocked in overtime to win the game. (I have no idea if this was a low kick/poor blocking/etc)

233 Total Yards of Offense (UWRF - 360)
-26 Net Yards Rushing (UWRF - 178)
18:39 TOP (UWRF - 41:21)
7 Sacks by the UWRF Defense
18 Total Tackles by UWL Sophomore Safety Ryan Weber.  Weber has 61 tackles through 4 games.

Box Score
http://uwlathletics.com/custompages/Football%20Stats/2015stats/uwl4.htm
For some reason the box score doesn't show sack stats (they were counted as TFL's) but the newspaper article reported them.

I think the team's preparations took a big hit because all of the student athletes were busy reading the Drake Hall Director email.

WOW.  :o   :o   :o  http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/uw-la-crosse-hall-director-reprimanded-for-email-on-orgasms-b99590429z1-330725971.html

Yikes - not sure how he ever thought that was a good idea.
UW-La Crosse

retagent

Quote from: 02 Warhawk on October 05, 2015, 10:33:46 AM
Quote from: MasterJedi on October 05, 2015, 10:31:11 AM
Quote from: NewHawk on October 05, 2015, 10:15:15 AM
Quote from: badgerwarhawk on October 04, 2015, 11:39:27 AM
Oshkosh had over 800 net yards of offense yesterday.  I don't care who you're playing that's OMG yardage.  I knew they'd be able to score against the Blue Devils but I never expected they'd be able to put up that kind of yardage.
While I don't think they can get that many yards against UWW defense, it is obviously important for the UWW offense to find a way to put more than 17 on the scoreboard next week.

Based pn how the Johnnie "D" has played in the last couple games, I may have abstained. ???

Maybe, maybe not. It all depends on what the UWW defense can do. Theoretically they could hold them to 7 points again like they did last year. UWO offense is good but so was UWP's and they were held mostly in check.

Have to remember, last year was also a 17-7 ugly win over UWP too and it was a slobberknocker 24-7 win over UWO. They're quality teams, they won't be blown out or be easy wins. WIAC defenses (at least for the top teams) are good and not built like other conferences defenses outside of a few other schools.

I'm so glad you added these last few words or else posters from other boards would have lit up this thread like a christmas tree (Wally, Oz, retagent, etc....)  ;D

Based on how the Johnnie "D" has played in the last couple games, I may have abstained. ???