FB: Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:19:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LAX LB

Quote from: KennethK on November 07, 2006, 10:09:45 AM
Based on WW's dominance in the WIAC the past two seasons, it sure appears Coach B has put together one of the all-time best teams your conference has seen.  When was the last time a WIAC team put together 10 and 0 seasons..back-to-back. 

95-96 UWL

DuffMan

What about the 2006 Warhawks vs. a hurricane?  But, the hurricane's name is Hurricane Warhawk.

A tradition unrivaled...
MIAC Champions: '32, '35, '36, '38, '53, '62, '63, '65, '71, '74, '75, '76, '77, '79, '82, '85, '89, '91, '93, '94, '95, '96, '98, '99, '01, '02, '03, '05, '06, '08, '09, '14, '18, '19, '21, '22, '24
National Champions: '63, '65, '76, '03

janesvilleflash

2006 Warhawks vs WIAC all stars, and the Warhawks are only 14 inches tall.

Mini Warhawks 31 Allstars 26

If Brez is normal size- 41-12
If you can't ignore an insult, top it; if you can't top it, laugh it off; and if you can't laugh it off, it's probably deserved.

Devil Badger Gopher

Just watch a UWW practice and you will get you answer. 
I think that many of the All-Stars are on the same team as the champs.
2000 WIAC Conference Champs

pastprime

I think I have the perfect match up.  What if UWW plays with themselves, I mean against themselves.  I think that is the only team that can beat WW is if they play with themselves, I mean against themselves.  
I may not have much to say, but I'll say it anyway.

LAX LB

Quote from: pastprime on November 07, 2006, 12:00:39 PM
I think I have the perfect match up.  What if UWW plays with themselves, I mean against themselves.  I think that is the only team that can beat WW is if they play with themselves, I mean against themselves.  

So they like playing with themselves.... Whitewater is fairly boring, but that boring

raiderguy

LAX LB

A problem? I am part of the solution. And the solution is......

NUMBER 9
NUMBER 9
NUMBER 9
NUMBER 9
NUMBER 9
NUMBER 9

So sayeth the Beatles and ya just don't "MUC" with the Beatles.
WELCOME TO THE MACHINE!

raiderguy

And awhile back someone mentioned that WW played their worst game of the season in the Stagg Bowl last year. I hope that wasn't some kind of lame excuse or an insinuation that the Raiders didn't earn the win?

Visions of Kmic and Garcon dancing in your heads.

They're back!

WELCOME TO THE MACHINE!

UWPSUPERFAN77

A Public Service Announcement: You guys in WI still have 57 minutes to vote! Blessings!

uww0212

Quote from: raiderguy on November 07, 2006, 05:55:10 PM
And awhile back someone mentioned that WW played their worst game of the season in the Stagg Bowl last year. I hope that wasn't some kind of lame excuse or an insinuation that the Raiders didn't earn the win?


____________________

I am among those who feel WW played one of their worst games in the Stagg Bowl.  This however does not mean that MUC didn't earn that victory.  I think the experience of playing under that pressure in the past made a big difference.  After the game I said it felt like MUC played for 4 quarters and our guys played for 3.  I don't mean that as an excuse either.  I give your guys credit for playing a complete ballgame.

On that note.... Getting another crack at MUC would be pretty sweet.

UWPSUPERFAN77

TO UWW o212: That is the game that I saw last December. Good Post!I still have not heard any speculation as to who has the inside track on replacing Coach BOB.  God Bless You!

BoBo

Quote from: UWPSUPERFAN77 on November 08, 2006, 01:49:01 AM
I still have not heard any speculation as to who has the inside track on replacing Coach BOB.  God Bless You!

UWPSUPERFAN77 - You might be in for a long wait.  While you were in Point, the UWW AD said last Sat. during his half-time radio interview, that although they have had a high level of interest in the job, the UWW administration wasn't in any hurry to make a decision.  In fact, it might not be until Jan. for the position announcement to be posted legally and Feb or March 2007 for an official selection to be made.  I believe the timing was out of respect for the remaining games on the schedule this year - you know, he didn't want to cause a possible unnecessary distraction to the current team and coaching staff while they were completing the conference season and making a run to the Stagg Bowl.
I'VE REACHED THAT AGE
WHERE MY BRAIN GOES
FROM "YOU PROBABLY
SHOULDN'T SAY THAT," TO
"WHAT THE HELL, LET'S SEE
WHAT HAPPENS."

fredfalcon

Quote from: LAX LB on November 03, 2006, 02:50:14 PM
Come on people, obviously I'm not working to hard today so lets get some trash talking going.  My UWP Alumni boss thinks I'm working, just like UWP thinks they can play FB.  Anyone miss UWRF old wishbone attack.   Those were the fastest games ever, off the bus, 1 hour of brusing FB, limp back to the shower, home before Happy hour.

LAX LB--great statement! Yes, I miss the wishbone. I, though frustrated, actually enjoyed being fooled about who had the ball: qb, fb, or rb. And this year's offense, supposedly adopted bcuz of fumbling and with the approval of the players, has proved to be a disappointment. Anderson, a thousand yard plus rusher a year ago, has not adapted to the new system, and Wolff, a 900 yd plus rusher last season, except for a few occasions, has had less of an effect. And with the wb the Falcons ALWAYS were the best rushing team in the conference. Also, predictions were that RF would throw the ball 40% in the new system. However, I see that Wolff was 6/10 last Saturday. But then, what do I know--I'm only a fan.

The reason I'm so late answering this post is that I've been out of the area for over a week. I'm looking forward to watching the Warhawks this Saturday. I think some of the posters from WW are getting a bit too full of themselves. They better hope that the players are not doing the same. The fact that WW does not have to win Saturday will work to RF's favor. It's not beyond possibility that RF could win Saturday like they did back in the mid-seventies on a bitterly cold day when WW came to town, with the title sewed up, to play a last place Falcon team. However, most of you posters were either "knee high to a grasshopper," then or not even born.
WORLD'S OLDEST FALCON FAN.

MESSAGE TO RECRUITS:  IN DOUBT? ENROLL AT STOUT. DON'T CARE? GO TO EAU CLAIRE. AT A LOSS? TRY LACROSSE. FEELIN' OUTTA JOINT? YOUR PLACE IS POINT. DON'T LIKE THE REST? DO WHAT'S BEST!


GOT BALLS? PLAY FOR THE FALLS!

BDB

Quote from: fredfalcon on November 08, 2006, 08:33:33 AM
I think some of the posters from WW are getting a bit too full of themselves. They better hope that the players are not doing the same. The fact that WW does not have to win Saturday will work to RF's favor. It's not beyond possibility that RF could win Saturday like they did back in the mid-seventies on a bitterly cold day when WW came to town, with the title sewed up, to play a last place Falcon team.

Oh fred. I guess it's your turn to fall into the trap of having the audacity to even consider that your favorite team could possibly win a football game against the mighty Warhawks.

Don't you realize you are foolish?

Don't you realize that your team shouldn't even show up?

Don't you realize that your squad will be playing a dynasty of 2 years?

Foolish fred. Although you, like myself, give all kinds of kudos to the Warhawks and their coaches for quite possibly being the best D-3 football team in the nation, you will be toasted for even considering that the Falcons could win.

Silly you.  ;)

DuffMan

I heard that the NCAA will be giving the Warhawks a free pass to the Stagg Bowl this year.  That way, they won't have to waste their time with the remaining regular season game and playoff games.  And, since we all know that they'll be playing there anyways, it'll just be easier this way.

Also, the shrine for the Walnut and Bronze is nearing completion on the UWW campus.

A tradition unrivaled...
MIAC Champions: '32, '35, '36, '38, '53, '62, '63, '65, '71, '74, '75, '76, '77, '79, '82, '85, '89, '91, '93, '94, '95, '96, '98, '99, '01, '02, '03, '05, '06, '08, '09, '14, '18, '19, '21, '22, '24
National Champions: '63, '65, '76, '03