FB: American Southwest Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:08:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mavchamp and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ron Boerger

FWIW Sully charges $11.52 per semester hour for "athletic fees".  That's in addition to tuition of $225.80 per hour (state residents), "student service fees"of $22/sh, $5/sh for "student center fees", $43.87/sh for "institutional service" fees, and one time fees of $100 for recreational sports and $34 for medical services.  Out of state students pay the same except $645.80/sh for tuition. 

CNU85

#26881
Quote from: Ron Boerger on Today at 05:07:00 PMFWIW Sully charges $11.52 per semester hour for "athletic fees".  That's in addition to tuition of $225.80 per hour (state residents), "student service fees"of $22/sh, $5/sh for "student center fees", $43.87/sh for "institutional service" fees, and one time fees of $100 for recreational sports and $34 for medical services.  Out of state students pay the same except $645.80/sh for tuition. 

Interesting. I just looked up CNU's fees for Intercollegiate athletics and intramurals. $117.46 per credit hour.

I believe they stop at 12 credit hours because everything is listed as the cost for 12-17 hours per semester.

12hrs X 117.46 X 4500 students X 2 semesters per year. That's $12.7 million to cover athletics and intramurals. Plus ticket sales and donors. On another board I recently calculated that football and basketball ticket sales are approx $500k. I know the donor amount but am not allowed to say other than it is 7 figures per year.  Throw in merchandise on campus, on line and in numerous local stores and also toss in proceeds from CNU Captains Lager and it all adds up quickly.

Riley Zayas

Yes, that's a good point on the athletic fees, Ron. Completely my bad on misinterpreting the scholarship structure. It does appear MavChamp was correct in noting that in Texas, funding is given to state schools for athletic operating expenses, but scholarships themselves stem from the athletic fees, fundraising, and donations. I do remember Sul Ross needing approval from the Texas State System Board of Regents before it could apply and begin the transition to Division II, because at the time, it sounded like their athletic budget would need to be expanded, and the board would need to approve that aspect before steps towards D2 could be fully taken.

I think the D3 model makes better sense, especially at a football school, for a number of reasons. It wouldn't be the biggest surprise if SRSU eventually opted to return to D3...it would certainly help if a couple of LSC schools decided to go D3 as well and expand the ASC's West Texas footprint.
Proverbs 21:31 | D3hoops.com WBB Top 25 voter | On the UMHB beat as the managing editor of TrueToTheCru.com, covering everything in CRU athletics | Contributing writer for The Big and The Best of D3 Texas Newsletter | Publisher of The Scoop on D3 Women's Hoops (Find it on the D3hoops.com Daily Dose).