Pool B

Started by Ralph Turner, October 01, 2005, 02:12:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bluenote

....well....I just thought it was interesting that Lewis & Clark could score 27 on Chicago and Case scored 35. I'm sure none of the teams mentioned gave up during the game. I'm just pointing out that Case must have a similar offensive attack to Lewis & Clark. I didn't say anything about defense... ;D

Bob.Gregg

Case Western Reserve 35, Chicago 3

Chicago 57, Lewis & Clark 27.

WHAT point are you trying to make?

Quote from: bluenoteWhat does that tell you?

THAT tells me pay no attention to Lewis & Clark.

It doesn't tell me a thing about Case Western Reserve and their status among the top Pool B teams, except that they beat Chicago, and remain UNDEFEATED.
Been wrong before.  Will be wrong again.

bluenote

....I already stated my point that Case has pretty much the same offensive attack as Lewis & Clark. I'd like to see Case and Lewis & Clark go head to head and battle it out!  ;)

Pat Coleman

Quote from: bluenote on October 31, 2007, 11:03:55 AM
....I already stated my point that Case has pretty much the same offensive attack as Lewis & Clark. I'd like to see Case and Lewis & Clark go head to head and battle it out!  ;)

You stated your point. But you didn't really prove it.

Case had 28 at the half against Chicago and won the second half 7-0. Seven players ran the ball for Case against Chicago.

L&C didn't ever get to 28 points. It scored its 27th point with eight minutes left in the game. And it took 20% more offensive snaps than Case did to get those 27 points.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

bluenote

...well I think Lewis & Clark maybe let up on Chicago a little. But I'm confident L& C would give Case a heck of a battle and maybe even come out on top on any given Saturday! After all Lewis and Clark almost beat Macalester a couple years ago!

Pat Coleman

Yes. It's natural to try to stop scoring when you're losing.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

bluenote

Pat...you crack me up!  :D 

usee

Quote from: bluenote on October 31, 2007, 10:39:50 AM
.... I'm sure none of the teams mentioned gave up during the game.


Quote from: bluenote on October 31, 2007, 10:39:50 AM
...well I think Lewis & Clark maybe let up on Chicago a little.

Now I am really confused.   ??? :P ::)

Pat Coleman

Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Bob.Gregg

#399
It's Fanaticism!

If Case doesn't look as good to somebody, Linfield (by default) must look better....

Give it a rest, blue.

While you can't find three other references from me to comparitive scores, I have to say this:

Case Western 35, Chicago 3
Chicago 57, Lewis & Clark 27.

And you think L&C would give Case a game?
Been wrong before.  Will be wrong again.

Pat Coleman

Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

MonroviaCat

Newest Regional Rankings Released:

No. Name In-Region Overall
East 
1.  Rensselaer  7-0  7-0
2.  The College of New Jersey  7-1  7-1
3.  Curry 9-0  9-0
4.  St. John Fisher  8-1  8-1
5.  Albright  7-1  7-1
6.  Alfred 7-1  7-1
7.  Hobart  6-2  6-2
8.  Union (New York)  5-2 5-2
9.  Cortland State  5-2  6-2
10.  Widener  5-2  6-2
North
1.  Mount Union  8-0  8-0
2.  Wheaton (Illinois)  8-0  8-0
3.  Wabash  8-0  8-0
4.  Case Western Reserve  6-0  8-0
5.  Franklin  7-1  7-1
6.  Mount St. Joseph  7-1  7-1
7.  Capital  6-2  6-2
8.  Wittenberg  6-2  6-2
9.  Illinois Wesleyan  6-2  6-2
10.  North Central (Illinois)  6-2  6-2
South
1.  Washington and Jefferson  5-0  8-0
2.  Wesley  6-1  8-1
3.  Mary Hardin-Baylor  7-1  7-1
4.  Muhlenberg  8-0  8-0
5.  Salisbury  4-1  8-1
6.  Waynesburg  6-1  7-1
7.  Trinity (Texas)  6-1  7-1
8.  Randolph Macon  7-1  7-1
9.  Ursinus  6-1  7-1
10.  Hampden-Sydney  5-2  6-2
West
1.  Wisconsin-Whitewater  7-0  7-1
2.  St. John's (Minnesota) 8-0  9-0
3.  Central (Iowa)  8-0  9-0
4.  St. Norbert  8-0  9-0
5.  Bethel (Minnesota)  7-1  7-1
6.  Wartburg  8-1  8-1
7.  Linfield  4-1  5-2
8.  Occidental  6-1  6-1
9.  Redlands  6-1  7-1
10.  Whitworth  6-1  6-2
Go Cats!

Bob.Gregg

Pool B Impact Games (Nov. 3rd)

1.  Case Western Reserve (8-0 / 6-0) vs. (bubble) Washington (MO) (6-2 / 6-2)

       
3.  Whitworth (6-2 / 6-1) vs. 5.  Linfield (5-2 / 4-1)

Regional Rankings:

Case Western Reserve--North #4
Wesley--South #2
Salisbury--South #5
Linfield--West #7
Whitworth--West #10
Been wrong before.  Will be wrong again.

smedindy

Comparing scores at any rate is a risky business. Because you have to take into account the conditions, injuries, conference vs. non conference, where the game was played, etc.

Yeesh.
Wabash Always Fights!

bluenote

Bob.Gregg.....Lewis & Clark may take them out. Their offenses are similar in that they both run and pass + they have a pretty decent chapel and dining hall!