Pool B

Started by Ralph Turner, October 01, 2005, 02:12:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bluenote

Quote from: MonroviaCat on November 01, 2007, 04:31:53 PM
Quote from: bluenote on November 01, 2007, 01:15:33 PM
Quote from: K-Mack on November 01, 2007, 01:43:28 AM
Wow, that was about as useless a two pages of reading as possible.

Nice work guys!

Reminds me of when I get home from a Linfield game and go to the NWC page. The 10 pages of play by play kill me.      ::)

K-Mack...will you be putting together a scenario for pool b/c after this weekends games?
Ouch.....some guys need the play by play :)

MonroviaCat....I was thinking that the game is broadcast on line? If you are on a computer why would you need to read the posts on the NWC Board?...why wouldn't you just listen to the game on your computer?  ;)  Maybe I'm missing something here?

janesvilleflash

You should start an in game thread like many others have.
If you can't ignore an insult, top it; if you can't top it, laugh it off; and if you can't laugh it off, it's probably deserved.

MonroviaCat

Quote from: bluenote on November 01, 2007, 07:32:30 PM
Quote from: MonroviaCat on November 01, 2007, 04:31:53 PM
Quote from: bluenote on November 01, 2007, 01:15:33 PM
Quote from: K-Mack on November 01, 2007, 01:43:28 AM
Wow, that was about as useless a two pages of reading as possible.

Nice work guys!

Reminds me of when I get home from a Linfield game and go to the NWC page. The 10 pages of play by play kill me.      ::)

K-Mack...will you be putting together a scenario for pool b/c after this weekends games?
Ouch.....some guys need the play by play :)

MonroviaCat....I was thinking that the game is broadcast on line? If you are on a computer why would you need to read the posts on the NWC Board?...why wouldn't you just listen to the game on your computer?  ;)  Maybe I'm missing something here?
Actually I don't need the play by play.  Some of the times I post the play by play because one of our online bretheren has posted that they can't get the feed.  When that isn't the case I am not quite doing play by play but more updates which some people like to check in on.  Still, I don't have a need to do it and can certainly stop (and no I'm not offended by your comment--my ouch comment was tongue in cheek :) )
Go Cats!

bluenote

...no prob MonroviaCat I just couldn't figure out why people on a computer would be more apt to read posts rather than just listen to the game. I like janesvilleflash's idea the best. That way you can post to your hearts content.   :D

Ralph Turner

I really like conference-specific in-game reports.

It lets us fans concentrate on following games and not mess up the usual traffic that we read on the conference message board.

I hope that the NWC will start an in-game report message board. :)

MonroviaCat

Done--NWC in game update page has been created.
Go Cats!

bluenote

KOOL...... :D

MonroviaCat....+K!!!!

Ryan Tipps

Quote from: bluenote on November 01, 2007, 07:32:30 PM
MonroviaCat....I was thinking that the game is broadcast on line? If you are on a computer why would you need to read the posts on the NWC Board?...why wouldn't you just listen to the game on your computer?  ;)  Maybe I'm missing something here?

bluenote, I know that MonroviaCat already answered this for you, but just so I can get my $.02 in, I can think of three reasons why I appreciate people to post updates:

1) I sometimes work on Saturdays, and though I can't keep Real Player on at work to listen to a game, I can certainly keep Post Patterns on in the background to keep tabs on the action.

2) Just about every week, there is no fewer than 10 games that I'm interested in and want to check on. Sure, I might be listening to one online, but the message boards (in addition to the D3 Scoreboard) help me to see what's going on in the other nine games I care about.

3) I live out in the sticks, where the only internet currently available to me is dial-up. So getting an online feed isn't like walking up hill, it's like climbing a mountain.  ;)
D3football.com Senior Editor and Around the Nation columnist. On Twitter: @NewsTipps

2.7 seconds. An average football player may need more time to score; a great one finds a way. I've seen greatness happen.

bluenote

Ryan Tipps (WCLegacy)....don't be givin' MonroviaCat any ideas! :D

MonroviaCat

Quote from: bluenote on November 02, 2007, 11:09:46 PM
Ryan Tipps (WCLegacy)....don't be givin' MonroviaCat any ideas! :D
Yeah, I might start posting play by play on all the pages! :)
Go Cats!

ADL70

If you haven't seen it elsewhere, CWRU wins 35-27.  9-0!!!
SPARTANS...PREPARE FOR GLORY
HA-WOO, HA-WOO, HA-WOO
Think beyond the possible.
Compete, Win, Respect, Unite

smedindy

Basically it's : Salisbury / Wesley / Whitworth / Case

Case needs to beat Ohio Wesleyan. With one loss Case is a definite bubble team. I can see a 2 loss Capital or Wittenberg ahead of a 1 loss Case.
Wabash Always Fights!

Bob.Gregg

#432
Team (record/regional record)
Remaining Schedule (Regional Games in Bold)

1.  Case Western Reserve (9-0 / 7-0)
          Nov. 10  Ohio Wesleyan

2.  Wesley (8-1 / 6-1)
including loss to Montclair State (27-26)

          Nov. 10  At Morrisville State

3.  Whitworth (7-2 / 7-1)
including loss to Redlands, 24-12
Loss to Azusa Pacific (non-NCAA), 38-34

          Nov. 10  At Puget South

4.  Salisbury (8-1 / 4-1)
including loss at Wesley, 20-13

          Nov. 10  Frostburg State

Pool B Bubble (not realistic chance to get invite, B OR C):Linfield (5-3 / 4-2)
Loss to Willamette, 33-32,
Loss to Western Ore., 32-20 (non-DIII)
Loss to Whitworth, 10-6

          Nov. 10  Lewis & Clark


Pacific Lutheran (6-2 / 6-2)
Loss to Whitworth, 28-21,
Loss to Linfield, 24-0

          Nov. 10  Willamette


If Case, Wesley, Whitworth and Salisbury win out, I believe

Case, Wesley & Whitworth get "B"s, and Salisburgy gets a "C", the first expanded-bracket C bid going to a B team.
Been wrong before.  Will be wrong again.

Ralph Turner

Quote from: Bob.Gregg on November 03, 2007, 09:37:57 PM
Team (record/regional record)
Remaining Schedule (Regional Games in Bold)

1.  Case Western Reserve (9-0 / 7-0)
          Nov. 10  Ohio Wesleyan

2.  Wesley (8-1 / 6-1)
including loss to Montclair State (27-26)

          Nov. 10  At Morrisville State

3.  Whitworth (6-2 / 6-1)
including loss to Redlands, 24-12
Loss to Azusa Pacific (non-NCAA), 38-34

          Nov. 10  At Puget South

4.  Salisbury (8-1 / 4-1)
including loss at Wesley, 20-13

          Nov. 10  Frostburg State

Pool B Bubble (not realistic chance to get invite, B OR C):Linfield (5-3 / 4-2)
Loss to Willamette, 33-32,
Loss to Western Ore., 32-20 (non-DIII)
Loss to Whitworth, 10-6

          Nov. 10  Lewis & Clark


Pacific Lutheran (6-2 / 6-2)
Loss to Whitworth, 28-21,
Loss to Linfield, 24-0


          Nov. 10  Willamette


If Case, Wesley, Whitworth and Salisbury win out, I believe

Case, Wesley & Whitworth get "B"s, and Salisburgy gets a "C", the first expanded-bracket C bid going to a B team.
+1 Bob,

In-region games are bolded.  Thanks.

d-train

I think you are showing one less Whitworth victory than you should. They play a 10 game schedule and have 7 regional D3 victories, a D3 loss (Redlands), and the loss to Azusa Pacific (NAIA) with Puget Sound (D3) on Saturday.