FB: Northwest Conference

[D O.C.]

  HAPPY HOLIDAYS CATFANS !

Let's get ready for bask baseball season !

(Anyone cares to know why I feel that way is welcome to PM me

OH! NWC folk, you too.

[bluenote]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

[T_Unit14]

Hey WC11...after watching the replay of Coppage running 75 yards for that last score of the '10 Stagg Bowl I started lookin through the other links on youtube...I've got a bone to pick with you...WHERE ARE THE OTHER STAGG BOWL VIDEOS?

I mean right when WW started winning you stopped making those sweet Stagg Bowl highlight videos.  I watched the ones of WW losing and then finally breaking through but I think that was the last one you made and I'm heartbroken.  You did a better job then some professional sports sites who focus solely on it.

Here's to hoping you saved tape up from 08 - 10 

[wildcat11]

T_Unit14,

Busted.  I did pull the clips from last year's game but just didn't get around to it.  This year, just too much on the plate to even consider it....even if two other teams were playing I wouldn't have put together a Stagg clip.  Sorry man! 

[river]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

And if the Warhawks had their first string QB playing it would have been worse for MU.   

[02 Warhawk]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

What made you think Mount didn't have their running attack?

[Alliance72]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

How much closer do you want it?  It was a 3 point game with about 2 1/2 minutes to go.

[bluenote]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

How much closer do you want it?  It was a 3 point game with about 2 1/2 minutes to go.

Maybe like a double overtime.... 

[bluenote]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

What made you think Mount didn't have their running attack?

I didn't watch the whole game but their running game didn't look that great in my opinion. How many yards did they get on the ground?

[bluenote]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

And if the Warhawks had their first string QB playing it would have been worse for MU.   

You never know...

[Alliance72]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

What made you think Mount didn't have their running attack?

I didn't watch the whole game but their running game didn't look that great in my opinion. How many yards did they get on the ground?

According to the stats on d3.com's  front page, they had  45 yards rushing including a 25 yard touchdown run by Murray in the second quarter.       

[02 Warhawk]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.    

What made you think Mount didn't have their running attack?

I didn't watch the whole game but their running game didn't look that great in my opinion. How many yards did they get on the ground?

well mount did "have" their running attack, but unfortunatley for UMU UWW's run defense was that much better.

[BoBo]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

What made you think Mount didn't have their running attack?

I didn't watch the whole game but their running game didn't look that great in my opinion. How many yards did they get on the ground?

According to the stats on d3.com's  front page, they had  45 yards rushing including a 25 yard touchdown run by Murray in the second quarter.       

If that what it says, it couldn't be more wrong. Jeremy Murray had 9 carries for a gain of 26 yards, lost 1 for a net of 25 (2.7 avg). His long was 15 yards which was the 2nd play of the game.  He did have a 1 yard TD which followed Lambert Budzinski's INT and was the 2nd of the 3 TD's during that 4 minute stretch of the 2nd quarter. Mount as a team did have 45 net yards on 26 carries (1.7 avg).

[badgerwarhawk]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

Ask yourself this question...Why didn't they have a running or passing attack when they had very effective ones in the fourteen games that preceded the Stagg Bowl?  Did they simply leave it in Alliance?  Or is there some other factor at work?

Not that I think it will convince you.   

[footballfan413]

I'm not all that convinced on Whitewater.... I think if Mount would have had either a running or passing attack it would have been closer.   

I believe these stats do qualify as having a running attack:

"Sophomore running back Jeremy Murray had 19 carries for 66 yards against Bethel to take him over 300 carries for the season. He has seven 100-yard rushing game this season and now has 302 carries for 1,591 yards on the season which is the fifth-best single-season yardage total in school history. The 302 carries are the most for a back in a season since former player and current Raider running back coach Nate Kmic had 377 carries in 2008."  Warhawkfootball.com

UMU just came up against the best defense they played all year and one whose bread and butter was stopping the run.  Let's give a little credit to UW-W's defense.................