Top 25 talk

Started by Lurker, March 23, 2005, 09:02:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fifth and Putnam

Quote from: hopefan on January 29, 2019, 09:38:47 AM
Wahoo... Being the Major fan in the universe of the SLIAC, you know I love to see ANY little guy recognized... was ecstatic to see tiny La Roche garner a single vote this week!!! La Roche, which probably has far fewer students than Neighboring North Hills or North Allegheny High Schools in the beautiful northern suburbs of Pittsburgh (guess where hopefan was born and raised) fell short by just a couple points to Marietta and Hope, but has otherwise run through AMCC and other local competition... Their near miss vs Marietta seems to indicate that they may actually be able to be competitive in their first round NCAA tourney matchup, assuming they win the AMCC tourney or squeek into a "C" bid....

I'll admit to being the La Roche vote. I've been contemplating it now for a couple of weeks. SOS numbers will scare folks away but I've had the chance to see them on several occasions this year and been very impressed. This is Coach Carmichael's best team (and he has had a few over the years) and they legitimately put a scare into Marietta on their home court. They really should have beaten Hope (lost a double digit lead in the 2nd half) on the road as well. The AMCC schedule is what it is, but they did as well as they could putting together a difficult OOC SOS (I am guessing they thought they would get more out of the John Carroll game). La Roche needs to just keep winning. They're a quality team and will be a dangerous opponent for a 1 or 2 seed in the pod if they can get to the tournament.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

It is a busy week, but I finally got my Top 25 blog done. Here it is for those interested: http://bit.ly/2Tm9RAy
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

No. 3 Whitman controlled most of the game against No. 10 Whitworth, though the Pirates got it to within 8 with 3:30 remaining, but Blues win 110-98.

Whitman sweeps the season series for the third straight season.

Whitworth losses two in a row. First back-to-back regular season losses for the Pirates since Nov. 2014.

Kyle Roach was limited, though hit a shot to cut it to within eight - missed the ensuing free throw.
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

SaintPaulite

Whitman 110, Whitworth 98.

Whitworth's defense is just not good. Even if they had been able to handle the press in the first half, they still wouldn't have won because they couldn't get stops, and that's with shooting 69% from the floor in the second half. They shot absolutely lights out and barely made a dent in the lead.

They didn't even look like a Pool C team to me. 312 points allowed in their last 3 games, the last 5 halves on really poor shot defense.

Whitman is very good, but it was just way too easy for them to score.

BluesBrother

Quote from: SaintPaulite on January 30, 2019, 01:17:41 AM
They didn't even look like a Pool C team to me.

Yup. I think they're closer to Linfield than Whitman this year.

SaintPaulite

Quote from: BluesBrother on January 30, 2019, 01:25:13 AM
Quote from: SaintPaulite on January 30, 2019, 01:17:41 AM
They didn't even look like a Pool C team to me.

Yup. I think they're closer to Linfield than Whitman this year.

I don't usually watch west coast games, but it's -50 windchill and I'm not going to work tomorrow, so what else was I gonna do?

I wasn't really impressed. College is an outstanding shooter that I'm not sure why Whitman left alone in the second half. But again, their defense is just not good. I think a lot of teams would have success going against that.

TheOsprey

I got to admit; I wasn't impressed with the first half Whitworth displayed last night.  Taking care of the ball was their biggest issue.

However,  the Blues are still the best team I have seen and will be a very formidable opponent to any tournament team. ;)

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh



The Hoopsville Marathon Show ... is tomorrow!

Tune in starting at 12:00 p.m. ET as we talk to guests from around the country about nothing but #d3hoops.

It is all about celebrating the season, student-athletes, coaches, and an exciting season.

For more information, click here: http://bit.ly/2HGx0N3

We will share more about the show a little later.
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

SaintPaulite

Quote from: TheOsprey on January 30, 2019, 01:11:41 PM
I got to admit; I wasn't impressed with the first half Whitworth displayed last night.  Taking care of the ball was their biggest issue.

However,  the Blues are still the best team I have seen and will be a very formidable opponent to any tournament team. ;)

Even if they had handled the ball well, they still didn't play good enough defense to win. Whitman is good but they didn't really shoot lights out, they just got a lot of very makeable shots. Other teams they beat have done a better job on defense against them but either turned it over too much or didn't make enough shots themselves.

Darryl Nester

How They Fared (So Far)

Top 25

Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#1607Augustana19-101/31 vs. #22 North Central (Ill.); 02/02 vs. North Park
#2595Nebraska Wesleyan19-1def. Central, 95-70; 02/02 vs. Buena Vista
#3582Whitman19-1def. #10 Whitworth, 110-98; 02/01 vs. Lewis and Clark
#4564UW-Oshkosh18-101/30 vs. UW-Whitewater postponed; 02/02 vs. UW-Stout
#5510St. Thomas17-101/31 vs. Macalester; 02/02 vs. Hamline
#6464Williams18-2def. Albertus Magnus, 85-67; 02/01 vs. T#32 Colby; 02/02 vs. Bowdoin
#7446MIT18-2def. Babson, 88-77; 02/02 vs. Wheaton (Mass.)
#8428Marietta17-201/31 vs. #19 Capital; 02/02 vs. Ohio Northern
#9392Randolph-Macon19-2def. Shenandoah, 96-76; 02/02 vs. Roanoke
#10384Whitworth16-4LOST to #3 Whitman, 98-110; 02/02 vs. Lewis and Clark
#11371Hamilton17-2def. Wells, 80-65; 02/01 vs. Bates; 02/02 vs. Tufts
#12327St. John's15-301/31 vs. Bethel; 02/02 vs. Macalester
#13304Wooster17-3def. Kenyon, 105-67; 02/02 vs. Ohio Wesleyan
#14291Wabash17-202/01 vs. Allegheny; 02/02 vs. Hiram
#15288Pomona-Pitzer19-1def. Redlands, 81-68; 02/02 vs. Chapman
#16232Swarthmore17-3def. Washington College, 84-61; 02/02 vs. Gettysburg
#17196Christopher Newport17-3def. St. Mary's (Md.), 79-76; 02/02 vs. Mary Washington
#18179Loras16-5LOST to Dubuque, 94-96 OT; 02/02 vs. Simpson
#19164Capital16-301/31 vs. #8 Marietta; 02/02 vs. John Carroll
#20155UW-Stevens Point13-501/31 vs. #25 UW-La Crosse; 02/02 vs. UW-River Falls
#21129Lynchburg17-4LOST to Roanoke, 56-78; 02/02 vs. Bridgewater (Va.)
#2291North Central (Ill.)17-301/31 vs. #1 Augustana
#2389Amherst15-302/01 vs. Tufts; 02/02 vs. Bates
#2477Nichols19-2def. Western New England, 82-63
#2553UW-La Crosse14-501/31 vs. #20 UW-Stevens Point; 02/02 vs. UW-Platteville


Others receiving votes
Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#2647Oswego State17-2def. SUNY New Paltz, 67-46; 02/02 vs. Cortland
#2729Plattsburgh State15-4def. SUNY Potsdam, 77-75 OT; 02/01 vs. Buffalo State; 02/02 vs. Fredonia
#2821Rochester14-402/01 vs. New York University; 02/03 vs. Brandeis
#2916Centre17-302/01 vs. Rhodes; 02/03 vs. Hendrix
#3014Emory14-402/01 vs. Brandeis; 02/03 vs. New York University
#3110Gordon18-2def. Wentworth, 73-71; 02/02 vs. Roger Williams
T#329Wesleyan15-502/01 vs. Trinity (Conn.)
T#329Wittenberg15-5def. Denison, 82-72; 02/02 vs. Kenyon
T#329Middlebury15-502/01 vs. Bowdoin; 02/02 vs. T#32 Colby
T#329Colby15-502/01 vs. #6 Williams; 02/02 vs. T#32 Middlebury
T#329Guilford15-502/02 vs. Hampden-Sydney
#376Wheaton (Ill.)15-501/31 vs. Carroll; 02/02 vs. Elmhurst
#385New Jersey City16-5def. Montclair State, 74-66; 02/02 vs. Stockton
T#393Arcadia17-3def. Albright, 77-69; 02/02 vs. Messiah
T#393Occidental17-3def. Chapman, 59-46; 02/02 vs. Cal Lutheran
T#393Scranton16-4LOST to Susquehanna, 81-89 OT; 02/02 vs. Catholic
T#422Eastern Connecticut16-4def. Mass-Boston, 79-54; 02/02 vs. Mass-Dartmouth
T#422WPI16-4def. Clark, 79-55; 02/02 vs. Coast Guard
#441La Roche17-201/31 vs. Penn State-Behrend; 02/02 vs. Pitt-Bradford

SaintPaulite

Well, Capital may have helped solve a couple of bracketing problems. They have to be in the driver's seat to host, and they may have sent Marietta to points south. #CNUislessthan500

Gregory Sager

#22 North Central 68
#1 Augustana 63

Nobody will go undefeated in CCIW play for the 46th straight season.
"To see what is in front of one's nose is a constant struggle." -- George Orwell

SaintPaulite

#12297
Quote from: Gregory Sager on January 31, 2019, 09:49:13 PM
#22 North Central 68
#1 Augustana 63

Nobody will go undefeated in CCIW play for the 46th straight season.

Vintage upset. Slow tempo, hit a bunch of 3, don't give up many, play defense.

If I understand what I heard from the selection committee guy on Hoopsville today, it sounds like the new methodology may favor a team like North Central. It sounded to me like it's going to be about who you beat, not who you lost to. So losing to North Park and Ohio Northern won't matter as much when you can say you beat Augustana.

Edit: I guess they only hit 7 3's. Seemed like more. Still +9 from 3, made the difference.

Gregory Sager

That, and the six straight stops the North Central defense got between 7:08 and 1:43 that were the key to an 8-0 run that allowed the Cards to flip a 56-52 deficit into a 60-56 lead.
"To see what is in front of one's nose is a constant struggle." -- George Orwell

fantastic50

Quote from: SaintPaulite on January 31, 2019, 10:10:08 PM
If I understand what I heard from the selection committee guy on Hoopsville today, it sounds like the new methodology may favor a team like North Central. It sounded to me like it's going to be about who you beat, not who you lost to.

I have observed in previous years that the number of wins vs regionally-ranked opponents matters much more than the number of losses vs that same group.  For example, 3-5 vRRO appears to get a better outcome than 2-2 vRRO.  Also, it has been really tough to get a Pool C bid without at least two wins vRRO, no matter your SOS or who the schedule includes.