Top 25 talk

Started by Lurker, March 23, 2005, 09:02:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

pjunito - MIT lost two points... that could be moving them down from 2 to 4 on a ballot... that's all.

And Hugenerd... I am just trying to give a point of view. For example, I moved MIT down my ballot a while back... when their play wasn't equating to where I had them ranked. They were winning... but not playing at the level I had them at... so I readjusted. But they weren't the only ones, my Top 15 was reevaluated that week... and another week I changed how I had my 15-25... I didn't blow up my ballot like I usually do... but it was close.

And voters can decide how to evaluate teams how they seem fit at any time. There are not set rules... and I wouldn't expect there to be other than do you due diligence and take it seriously.
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

wooscotsfan

Quote from: KnightSlappy on February 21, 2012, 11:01:45 PM
Quote from: Hugenerd on February 21, 2012, 09:53:01 PM
I understand your explanation, and I am sure that is more true early in seasons when there are less games to go by, I just cant seeing it happening the last week of the regular season.  I know that people give MIT a hard time for their scheduling, but if they were really dropped a spot for beating WPI on the road this week, I would have lost some faith in the voters.  I know MIT gets knocked for their schedule, but its not as bad as people make it out to be. When the rankings come out tomorrow, you will see that their OWP will be in the 0.50's and their OOWP will be in the 0.53's, giving them an SOS somewhere in the 0.51-0.52 range, which will be essentially identical to a lot of other highly ranked teams (eg, Hope). I'm not trying to say voters don't look at the whole picture and dont have a right to reevaluate teams as they feel fit, just that in this case, at this late in the season, it didn't seem to be a very believable explanation.

Through most of tonight's results, I have MIT as having the #6 tournament resume in the country.

Amherst
Hope
Middlebury
Cabrini
Mary Hardin-Baylor
MIT

IMO, the overrated team on that Top 6 list is Cabrini!  They have played no strong teams all year and this is essentially the same team that Wooster waxed by 17 points in a Sweet 16 game last year in the NCAA tourney.  In fact, Cabrini graduated Dom Farrello who was a starter and top scorer for them last year.

The current Massey rating for Cabrini is only #16 and I think that rating may even be high.

Take a look at Cabrini's current roster and you will find that they have only 1 player that is 6'7".  They have NO post depth and that is why Wooster outrebounded them last year in the NCAA tourney game by a 39 to 20 margin.  If you have a quick guard that can stay in front of Corey Lemmons (Wooster did) and force him to take jump shots, they are very beatable.

I will be surprised if Cabrini makes it to the Elite Eight this year.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)

Quote from: wooscotsfan on February 22, 2012, 12:04:08 AM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on February 21, 2012, 11:01:45 PM
Quote from: Hugenerd on February 21, 2012, 09:53:01 PM
I understand your explanation, and I am sure that is more true early in seasons when there are less games to go by, I just cant seeing it happening the last week of the regular season.  I know that people give MIT a hard time for their scheduling, but if they were really dropped a spot for beating WPI on the road this week, I would have lost some faith in the voters.  I know MIT gets knocked for their schedule, but its not as bad as people make it out to be. When the rankings come out tomorrow, you will see that their OWP will be in the 0.50's and their OOWP will be in the 0.53's, giving them an SOS somewhere in the 0.51-0.52 range, which will be essentially identical to a lot of other highly ranked teams (eg, Hope). I'm not trying to say voters don't look at the whole picture and dont have a right to reevaluate teams as they feel fit, just that in this case, at this late in the season, it didn't seem to be a very believable explanation.

Through most of tonight's results, I have MIT as having the #6 tournament resume in the country.

Amherst
Hope
Middlebury
Cabrini
Mary Hardin-Baylor
MIT

IMO, the overrated team on that Top 6 list is Cabrini!  They have played no strong teams all year and this is essentially the same team that Wooster waxed by 17 points in a Sweet 16 game last year in the NCAA tourney.  In fact, Cabrini graduated Dom Farrello who was a starter and top scorer for them last year.

The current Massey rating for Cabrini is only #16 and I think that rating may even be high.

Take a look at Cabrini's current roster and you will find that they have only 1 player that is 6'7".  They have NO post depth and that is why Wooster outrebounded them last year in the NCAA tourney game by a 39 to 20 margin.  If you have a quick guard that can stay in front of Corey Lemmons (Wooster did) and force him to take jump shots, they are very beatable.

I will be surprised if Cabrini makes it to the Elite Eight this year.

It all depends on the bracket.
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

KnightSlappy

Quote from: wooscotsfan on February 22, 2012, 12:04:08 AM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on February 21, 2012, 11:01:45 PM
Quote from: Hugenerd on February 21, 2012, 09:53:01 PM
I understand your explanation, and I am sure that is more true early in seasons when there are less games to go by, I just cant seeing it happening the last week of the regular season.  I know that people give MIT a hard time for their scheduling, but if they were really dropped a spot for beating WPI on the road this week, I would have lost some faith in the voters.  I know MIT gets knocked for their schedule, but its not as bad as people make it out to be. When the rankings come out tomorrow, you will see that their OWP will be in the 0.50's and their OOWP will be in the 0.53's, giving them an SOS somewhere in the 0.51-0.52 range, which will be essentially identical to a lot of other highly ranked teams (eg, Hope). I'm not trying to say voters don't look at the whole picture and dont have a right to reevaluate teams as they feel fit, just that in this case, at this late in the season, it didn't seem to be a very believable explanation.

Through most of tonight's results, I have MIT as having the #6 tournament resume in the country.

Amherst
Hope
Middlebury
Cabrini
Mary Hardin-Baylor
MIT

IMO, the overrated team on that Top 6 list is Cabrini!  They have played no strong teams all year and this is essentially the same team that Wooster waxed by 17 points in a Sweet 16 game last year in the NCAA tourney.  In fact, Cabrini graduated Dom Farrello who was a starter and top scorer for them last year.

The current Massey rating for Cabrini is only #16 and I think that rating may even be high.

Take a look at Cabrini's current roster and you will find that they have only 1 player that is 6'7".  They have NO post depth and that is why Wooster outrebounded them last year in the NCAA tourney game by a 39 to 20 margin.  If you have a quick guard that can stay in front of Corey Lemmons (Wooster did) and force him to take jump shots, they are very beatable.

I will be surprised if Cabrini makes it to the Elite Eight this year.

I definitely would be the most skeptical about Cabrini too, but numbers is numbers. They're undefeated in-region and 3-0 versus regionally ranked teams.

onetinsoldier

Quote from: Hoops Fan on February 22, 2012, 09:36:56 AM
Quote from: wooscotsfan on February 22, 2012, 12:04:08 AM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on February 21, 2012, 11:01:45 PM
Quote from: Hugenerd on February 21, 2012, 09:53:01 PM
I understand your explanation, and I am sure that is more true early in seasons when there are less games to go by, I just cant seeing it happening the last week of the regular season.  I know that people give MIT a hard time for their scheduling, but if they were really dropped a spot for beating WPI on the road this week, I would have lost some faith in the voters.  I know MIT gets knocked for their schedule, but its not as bad as people make it out to be. When the rankings come out tomorrow, you will see that their OWP will be in the 0.50's and their OOWP will be in the 0.53's, giving them an SOS somewhere in the 0.51-0.52 range, which will be essentially identical to a lot of other highly ranked teams (eg, Hope). I'm not trying to say voters don't look at the whole picture and dont have a right to reevaluate teams as they feel fit, just that in this case, at this late in the season, it didn't seem to be a very believable explanation.

Through most of tonight's results, I have MIT as having the #6 tournament resume in the country.

Amherst
Hope
Middlebury
Cabrini
Mary Hardin-Baylor
MIT

IMO, the overrated team on that Top 6 list is Cabrini!  They have played no strong teams all year and this is essentially the same team that Wooster waxed by 17 points in a Sweet 16 game last year in the NCAA tourney.  In fact, Cabrini graduated Dom Farrello who was a starter and top scorer for them last year.

The current Massey rating for Cabrini is only #16 and I think that rating may even be high.

Take a look at Cabrini's current roster and you will find that they have only 1 player that is 6'7".  They have NO post depth and that is why Wooster outrebounded them last year in the NCAA tourney game by a 39 to 20 margin.  If you have a quick guard that can stay in front of Corey Lemmons (Wooster did) and force him to take jump shots, they are very beatable.

I will be surprised if Cabrini makes it to the Elite Eight this year.

It all depends on the bracket.

I could not have said it better myself.  I would be surprised if Cabrini didnt make the elite 8, assuming a bracket that the top Mid atlantic seed would deserve.  I agree, they might not be on the same list the NE schools or a Va Wesleyan, but they probably wont have to play any of the those top tier teams before the elite 8.  And of course, they will probably host. 
Go ahead and hate your neighbor, Go ahead and cheat a friend. Do it in the name of Heaven, You can justify it in the end. There won't be any trumpets blowing Come the judgement day,
On the bloody morning after....
One tin soldier rides away.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

And let's not discount the play of Cory Lemons who is the team's leading scorer, rebounder, and assist man, and steals leader...
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

Greek Tragedy

Quote from: KnightSlappy on February 22, 2012, 10:58:33 AM
I definitely would be the most skeptical about Cabrini too, but numbers is numbers. They're undefeated in-region and 3-0 versus regionally ranked teams.

Their in-region OWP is barely .500 (.504).  Their in-region results against ranked opponents are against Keystone (twice) and Widener, if I'm correct.  Keystone's in-region OWP is worse at .486 (and 0-2 vsRR),  Widener is legit with OWP at .585 and 4-4.
Pointers
Breed of a Champion
2004, 2005, 2010 and 2015 National Champions

Fantasy Leagues Commissioner

TGHIJGSTO!!!

Darryl Nester

How They Fared (So Far)

Not many results, but perhaps useful to see what is coming this weekend.

Top 25

Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#1623Hope25-1def. Calvin, 87-80; 02/25 vs. Adrian
#2581Amherst23-202/25 vs. Bates
#3549MIT23-102/25 vs. Babson
#4530Middlebury23-202/25 vs. T#29 Wesleyan
#5512Mary Hardin-Baylor24-102/24 vs. Mississippi College
#6505Cabrini25-1def. Immaculata, 87-68; 02/24 vs. Keystone
#7469Virginia Wesleyan22-302/24 vs. Washington and Lee
#8453UW-Whitewater22-302/24 vs. UW-La Crosse
#9447Birmingham-Southern24-102/24 vs. University of Dallas
#10410Whitworth22-302/23 vs. Lewis and Clark
#11391Claremont-Mudd-Scripps23-2LOST to Pomona-Pitzer, 50-51; 02/24 vs. Redlands
#12331Franklin and Marshall23-202/24 vs. Washington College; 02/25 vs. TBD
#13288William Paterson23-3def. Kean, 72-56; 02/25 at Richard Stockton
#14274Oswego State23-3def. New Paltz State, 73-62; 02/24 vs. Brockport State
#15208Albertus Magnus25-1def. Emerson, 82-58; 02/23 vs. Lasell
#16206Transylvania22-302/25 vs. TBA
#17189Wittenberg21-5def. Kenyon, 73-61; 02/24 vs. Denison
#18186Augustana19-6LOST at #22 Wheaton (Ill.), 44-74
#19160Wooster22-4def. DePauw, 59-51; 02/24 vs. #42 Ohio Wesleyan; 02/25 at TBA
#20130UW-Stevens Point20-6def. UW-Superior, 62-52; 02/24 at #34 UW-River Falls
#21111Hartwick23-202/24 vs. Ithaca
#2289Wheaton (Ill.)20-5def. #18 Augustana, 74-44; 02/24 vs. T#29 Illinois Wesleyan
#2357Rhode Island College21-5def. Plymouth State, 79-48; 02/24 at #33 Western Connecticut
#2456Washington U.18-602/25 at Chicago
#2552Bethany23-3def. Waynesburg, 82-69; 02/23 vs. Washington and Jefferson


Others receiving votes
Rank   Pts   TeamW-L   Results
#2650Emory19-502/25 at Rochester
#2734North Central (Ill.)18-7IDLE
#2831Eastern Connecticut20-502/24 vs. #36 Keene State
T#2929Illinois Wesleyan19-602/24 at #22 Wheaton (Ill.)
T#2929Randolph-Macon20-502/24 vs. Eastern Mennonite
T#2929Wesleyan20-502/25 at #4 Middlebury
#3226Christopher Newport21-402/24 vs. Methodist
#3322Western Connecticut20-502/24 vs. #23 Rhode Island College
#3421UW-River Falls18-702/24 vs. #20 UW-Stevens Point
#3514Lake Forest20-302/24 vs. Carroll; 02/25 vs. TBD
#3610Keene State19-7def. Mass-Dartmouth, 75-64; 02/24 at #28 Eastern Connecticut
#378New York University19-502/25 at Brandeis
T#385Gustavus Adolphus19-6IDLE
T#385Hobart22-4def. Union, 73-53; 02/25 vs. Skidmore
#404Worcester Polytech18-602/25 vs. Springfield; 02/26 at TBD
#413Wabash18-8LOST to Denison, 60-74
#422Ohio Wesleyan20-6def. Hiram, 96-86; 02/24 at #19 Wooster
#431Widener18-8LOST to Lycoming, 77-79

augie77

North Central hosts #18 Augustana in a CCIW tournament semi-final on Friday.

Darryl Nester

Quote from: augie77 on February 23, 2012, 10:32:31 AM
North Central hosts #18 Augustana in a CCIW tournament semi-final on Friday.

Thanks for pointing that out.  I should have prefaced that report by saying that it only includes games that have been added to the d3hoops.com schedule.  The Augie/NC game is not listed on either of their d3hoops.com pages:
North Central and Augustana

Others should feel free to chip in with similar corrections.

Ralph Turner

Quote from: Ralph Turner on January 16, 2012, 08:37:15 PM
Wow!!! NYU goes from zero to 87 in one weekend.

Is it a "UAA road loss" for Emory or are the Violets that good?

The top dog in the UAA is almost always Top 25 material...

and the runner-up (a 11-3/20-5 or better record is almost always Top 25 calibre as well.)

NYU needs to go 11-3 for me to think that they are Top 25.  (Just my humble opinion...)
The Violets shrink in the last half of the season to go 9-5 in the UAA.

The weak non-conference schedule did not reflect the true NYU team early in the season.

sac

Quote from: Ralph Turner on February 26, 2012, 08:49:50 PM
Quote from: Ralph Turner on January 16, 2012, 08:37:15 PM
Wow!!! NYU goes from zero to 87 in one weekend.

Is it a "UAA road loss" for Emory or are the Violets that good?

The top dog in the UAA is almost always Top 25 material...

and the runner-up (a 11-3/20-5 or better record is almost always Top 25 calibre as well.)

NYU needs to go 11-3 for me to think that they are Top 25.  (Just my humble opinion...)
The Violets shrink in the last half of the season to go 9-5 in the UAA.

The weak non-conference schedule did not reflect the true NYU team early in the season.

NYU's losses were by 3, 2, 3, 9 and 6  :-\

Ralph Turner

Quote from: sac on February 26, 2012, 08:59:24 PM
Quote from: Ralph Turner on February 26, 2012, 08:49:50 PM
Quote from: Ralph Turner on January 16, 2012, 08:37:15 PM
Wow!!! NYU goes from zero to 87 in one weekend.

Is it a "UAA road loss" for Emory or are the Violets that good?

The top dog in the UAA is almost always Top 25 material...

and the runner-up (a 11-3/20-5 or better record is almost always Top 25 calibre as well.)

NYU needs to go 11-3 for me to think that they are Top 25.  (Just my humble opinion...)
The Violets shrink in the last half of the season to go 9-5 in the UAA.

The weak non-conference schedule did not reflect the true NYU team early in the season.

NYU's losses were by 3, 2, 3, 9 and 6  :-\
And if NYU had swept the series with WashU, then they would have earned the AQ at 10-4.

wooscotsfan

8 teams from the Top 25 eliminated in the first round of the NCAAs:

10. Mary Hardin-Baylor
11. Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
12. William Paterson
13. Birmingham-Southern
17. UW River Falls
18. Transylvania
20. Bethany
25. Christopher Newport

A couple of these teams seemed overrated, IMO.  I never believed that Bethany or Birmingham-Southern even belonged in the Top 25 when their gaudy records came against weak competition and they had no real quality wins.

I think the Top 25 voters need to pay more attention to the SOS stat.  Bethany had a very weak SOS of 0.437 and Birmingham-Southern was not much better at 0.443.

smedindy

#6959
I don't think BSC was that overrated. You don't want to double penalize people for their schedule. They're relatively isolated and did their future conference mate Barry a favor by giving them two games.

It's not like they got blown out - they played a tough team AND spent time locked in the basement of a hotel.
Wabash Always Fights!