MBB: North Coast Athletic Conference

Started by WoosterFAN, January 27, 2005, 10:51:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

smedindy

Is that anything like "Grease is the word??"
Wabash Always Fights!

Li'l Giant

I'm assuming this is a sock of our previously dearly departed Denison denouncer?  ???
"I believe in God and I believe I'm gonna go to Heaven, but if something goes wrong and I end up in Hell, I know it's gonna be me and a bunch of D3 officials."---Erik Raeburn

Quote from: sigma one on October 11, 2015, 10:46:46 AMI don't drink with the enemy, and I don't drink lattes at all, with anyone.

wooscotsfan

Quote from: smedindy on January 16, 2007, 01:14:59 AM
But the QOWI is not even a power rating, since it's all about the region and takes no differnece in between the other regions.

It's a heinous measurement...and I like measurements.

Smeds -- I share some of your frustration with the current NCAA selection process.

For the QoWI -- should we call it a "regionally constrained power rating"?  :) ;D :P

...or is the "worthless wins index" a better descriptor?  :)

WillieBrown

If I got 30 shots a game like Hodgingford I might put some big numbers too. Being very good on a bad team will ruin your chance at poy, ask matt formato. Or as i like to call him Matt "This dude sucks (5 mins later) This dude is awesome" Formato which is coincidentally the best nickname in the history of the ncac.
"Hey Musberger! Will Monmouth cover against Villanova" -Me
(Stops dead in his tracks from a full powerwalk)
"Anything over 20, take the dog" -Brent Musberger
"Thanks Mussy" -Me

hodgistheman

Willie...

There is a big difference between a good player on a bad team and a good player on a good team. I assume you are neither, so why knock Hodgkinson because the team wasn't so hot early, they have improved recently and have a chance of being in the top four or five of the conference.

imderekpoe

Quote from: hodgistheman on January 17, 2007, 08:50:47 AM
Willie...

There is a big difference between a good player on a bad team and a good player on a good team. I assume you are neither, so why knock Hodgkinson because the team wasn't so hot early, they have improved recently and have a chance of being in the top four or five of the conference.

I'm not sure that beating Oberlin and Allegheny (both at home) points to a great deal of improvement!  If they manage to win a couple of road games this week maybe we can talk about them being improved...

pennstghs

What is happening to the NCAC when Hiram and Denison players win Player of the Week in concurrent weeks? Denison has to prove themselves first before anyone is going to take them very seriously, although they did manage to scare Wittenberg earlier this year again, but if your team is basing it's success on coming close to winnning big games, you've got a little issue
WE ARE.................PENN STATE!
"Let's GO WITT"

hodgistheman

Fellas...

It is very easy to stand back and judge anohter player or teams program. Denison, because of strict entrance guidline will never be real competitive across the board, so what is wrong when a very good player comes along and you want o support him and the team. I have not knocked Wooster or Witt or any other NCAC team, yet you seem to want to rip somebody for having an opinion.

hodgistheman

By the way, what ever happened to Kyle McKee at Hiram?

imderekpoe

Quote from: hodgistheman on January 17, 2007, 09:51:36 AM
Fellas...

It is very easy to stand back and judge anohter player or teams program. Denison, because of strict entrance guidline will never be real competitive across the board, so what is wrong when a very good player comes along and you want o support him and the team. I have not knocked Wooster or Witt or any other NCAC team, yet you seem to want to rip somebody for having an opinion.

I don't think that anyone was knocking Hodgkinson.  I thought the discussion was assessing his chances of winning POY, and that they were not as good because of the quality of his team.  At least that what I was thinking...

We're always happy to see support for other teams in here.  Sorry if my comments (or others) came off as any disrespect, but if a team is bad you've got to expect some negativity...


hodgistheman

I understand the negativity but you can't knock a guy for going out and doing what he does on a nightly basis. Can you name anyone the has been more consistent over four years than Dan Hodgkinson.

WillieBrown

Quote from: hodgistheman on January 17, 2007, 08:50:47 AM
Willie...

There is a big difference between a good player on a bad team and a good player on a good team. I assume you are neither, so why knock Hodgkinson because the team wasn't so hot early, they have improved recently and have a chance of being in the top four or five of the conference.

Your instincts are correct, I am a very average basketball player who does not play for any team in the ncac. And I said Hodgy was a good player. The only thing I want to know is if Hodgkinson knows about your unhealthy infatuation with him?
"Hey Musberger! Will Monmouth cover against Villanova" -Me
(Stops dead in his tracks from a full powerwalk)
"Anything over 20, take the dog" -Brent Musberger
"Thanks Mussy" -Me

jimmychitwood15

No one will argue Hodgkinson's consistency, but I think that is the point of the discussion. No disrespect to his career thus far at Denison but I think if he went to Witt or Woo there's no way he would've started or gotten significant minutes early in his career. In those programs, even very talented players have to 'wait their turn' b/c number of talented kids that go to those school to be a part of winning programs. This is a big factor in why those programs stay strong year in and year out.

David Collinge

Having seen Denison play 5 times this season, I feel compelled to disagree with four of the above statements:

Quote from: cmhscots on January 17, 2007, 09:41:49 AM
I'm not sure that beating Oberlin and Allegheny (both at home) points to a great deal of improvement!  If they manage to win a couple of road games this week maybe we can talk about them being improved...

Considering where Denison was before this week, their wins over Oberlin (by 27) and Allegheny (by 20) are unmistakeable signs of improvement.  However,

Quote from: hodgistheman on January 17, 2007, 08:50:47 AM[...]they have improved recently and have a chance of being in the top four or five of the conference.

I think that's overreaching. 

Quote from: hodgistheman on January 17, 2007, 09:51:36 AMDenison, because of strict entrance guidline will never be real competitive across the board[...]

Denison has, of course, won nine consecutive all-sports trophies in this conference, and lead in the race for the 10th.  Suggesting that admissions standards in Granville are significantly different from those in the other admissions offices is ridiculous.  Denison has been handicapped in the past by its administration's insistence on national recruiting, but that's a problem faced by Kenyon and Oberlin as well (perhaps others), so DU is not alone in this regard.  Anyway, both Hodgkinson and Izzo are from Chicagoland, so national recruiting has maybe not been such a detriment to the Big Red after all.

Finally,

Quote from: jimmychitwood15 on January 17, 2007, 11:07:11 AM
No one will argue Hodgkinson's consistency, but I think that is the point of the discussion. No disrespect to his career thus far at Denison but I think if he went to Witt or Woo there's no way he would've started or gotten significant minutes early in his career.

I've seen a lot of Wooster, and a lot of Denison, and I think Dan Hodgkinson would be a starter for the Scots, or at least a key contributor, had he gone there.  I'm less well-versed about Wittenberg, but I suspect he'd be a starter there too.

smedindy

Hodgkinson has family ties, though, to Denison. I think he would have played a lot and started wherever he went in D-3, but certainly he wouldn't be amassing the stats at Wooster or Witt, and his defense would have cost him some time at those schools.
Wabash Always Fights!