Pool C

[Ralph Turner]

https://web1.ncaa.org/TES/exec/miles

Officially, MIT to RPI is 173.0 Miles.

Great pick-up!  

+1 to both of you!

Ralph, I just spent the last 15-20 minutes re-searching for that link to verify, and after I find it, you go and post it two minutes before I post! You could have saved me a lot of trouble if you posted a few minutes ago!  

Ehh, I was sitting at my desk doing some end-of-the-year stuff and watching the Star Wars marathon on Spike TV, except they are showing the re-make and not the old original tapes.

(IMHO, the most dramatic special effects scene in history is when the Star Destroyer in Episode IV comes across the screen.  That was one huge space ship!  It is coming op right now.   )

Now you have the official link!  


Talk about a guy with a cool name, my IT guy's last name is Kessel, as in the "spice mines of Kessel" and the Kessel run".

[Hugenerd]

Knight,

So the MIT win over RPI should count as in-region, based on the 200 mile rule (It does not appear to be counted as in-region in your rankings because MITs region record only shows 9-0). I just mapquested it and it is 172 miles from the address on the RPI website to 77 Mass. Ave. in Cambridge.  This should also increase their OWP somewhat, as RPI's only loss is to MIT.

You're right it should be counted, and I'll make sure it gets updated on my sheet.

I'm currently going off of the d3hoops.com team schedules, so if they don't have the "•" next to the game, then I don't count it unless I catch it.

What would the NCAA do without either of you!

If you were wondering, I am sitting on a plane with a baby crying (not mine) and my daughter punching me in the arm repeatedly because she is going nuts from sitting in one place for5 hours and eating about a pound of M&Ms. At least I can say that these 5 hours werent a waste now that I made that MIT-RPI pickup.

[Ralph Turner]

We have a really bad ice storm going on over and to the west of DFW.

Ranger Hill is a 6% grade just east of Ranger TX on I-20.

The Ice Storm has shut down I-20.

In 2001-02, McMurry had to cancel a game at Mississippi College because a November ice storm shut down I-20.

[David Collinge]

It's like all the way down in the sixties here in L.A.  Brrrrr.  But unlike Ralph, I'm not a whiny baby.  

I don't know about the rest of you, but I think there's some amount of irony in hugenerd finding another hole in the NCAA's goofy arbitrary-200-mile-limited-travel-restriction-based ranking schema while traveling somewhere on a commercial airline.   

[deiscanton]

Officially, Vassar to Brandeis is 192.0 miles according to the NCAA's calculations.

Brandeis men should be 7-1 in-region.

[hopefan]

In St Louis, that ice that Ralph is getting is rain, and it has rained steady for 24 hours.....   Instead of being iced in or snowed in, I may be flooded in!!!


ahh but santa brought a new 52 inch Samsung for the living room and I just finished connecting it to the dish!!!!!   When's the next game???   Well will have to settle for Ralphie and a Christmas Story.

Seriously guys, Merry Christmas to you all  -   you are all very good friends!!!!

[magicman]

KnightSlappy,
I was checking on Plattsburgh State's regional record and I don't think their loss to Elms College should be counted as a regional game. The mileage from the official link that Ralph provided shows the distance from Plattsburgh, N.Y.  to Elms campus in Chicopee, Mass. as 242 miles. Also don't think Plattsburgh's win over Husson University from Bangor Maine should be counted as the mileage chart shows that to be 337 miles.  Both Husson and Elms are in the Northeast region, and are not in the same NCAA administrative region as Plattsburgh St. which is in Region 2 (New York and Pennslyvania). I know that the Plattsburgh team page on D3hoops shows both of these as regional games but I don't see how that's possible. I think Plattsburgh's  regional record should be 6-0. You might want to update your sheet on those 2 games, unless I missed something. I remember last year I thought there was a mistake on a teams regional record and Ralph came on to correct me that even though it was like 350 miles between schools they were in the same administrative region. But I don't see how these 2 games (Elms and Husson) become in-region.    

[KnightSlappy]

KnightSlappy,
I was checking on Plattsburgh State's regional record and I don't think their loss to Elms College should be counted as a regional game. The mileage from the official link that Ralph provided shows the distance from Plattsburgh, N.Y.  to Elms campus in Chicopee, Mass. as 242 miles. Also don't think Plattsburgh's win over Husson University from Bangor Maine should be counted as the mileage chart shows that to be 337 miles.  Both Husson and Elms are in the Northeast region, and are not in the same NCAA administrative region as Plattsburgh St. which is in Region 2 (New York and Pennslyvania). I know that the Plattsburgh team page on D3hoops shows both of these as regional games but I don't see how that's possible. I think Plattsburgh's  regional record should be 6-0. You might want to update your sheet on those 2 games, unless I missed something. I remember last year I thought their was a mistake on a teams regional record and Ralph came on to correct me that even though it was like 350 miles between schools they were in the same administrative region. But I don't see how these 2 games (Elms and Husson) become in-region.    

I changed these games.

Officially, Vassar to Brandeis is 192.0 miles according to the NCAA's calculations.

Brandeis men should be 7-1 in-region.

Changed this one as well, thanks!

[KnightSlappy]

This update should include the regional game corrections that were found.

REG   #   WP      OWP     OOWP    RPI      NAT   Pool      REG   OVR   CONF     Team
                                    
NE   01   0.857   0.622   0.513   0.6534   020   A   C     6-1   7-1   NAC      Thomas
NE   02   0.875   0.593   0.514   0.6440   024   A   C     7-1   7-1   LEC      Eastern Connecticut
NE   03   0.600   0.679   0.547   0.6261   033   A   C     3-2   5-2   NESCAC   Bates
NE   04   0.750   0.593   0.550   0.6214   036   C   016   6-2   6-2   LEC      Mass-Dartmouth
NE   05   1.000   0.478   0.516   0.6181   037   C   017   5-0   7-0   NESCAC   Middlebury
NE   06   0.500   0.727   0.497   0.6130   042   C   021   2-2   4-3   NAC      Husson
NE   07   0.667   0.639   0.487   0.6078   048   B   002   4-2   6-2   NECC     Elms
NE   08   0.750   0.569   0.541   0.6071   049   C   025   6-2   6-2   NESCAC   Bowdoin
NE   09   0.875   0.463   0.610   0.6027   055   C   028   7-1   7-1   UAA      Brandeis
NE   10   0.875   0.500   0.532   0.6017   058   C   031   7-1   8-1   LEC      Western Connecticut
NE   11   1.000   0.412   0.570   0.5983   064   A         10-0  11-0  NEWMAC   MIT
NE   12   0.889   0.435   0.611   0.5926   069   C   039   8-1   9-1   NEWMAC   Worcester Polytech
NE   13   0.875   0.439   0.613   0.5915   072   C   042   7-1   7-1   NESCAC   Colby
NE   14   0.500   0.696   0.452   0.5858   076   C   046   4-4   4-4   NESCAC   Wesleyan
                                    
E   001   1.000   0.676   0.509   0.7150   005   A   C     6-0   7-1   SUNYAC   Plattsburgh State
E   002   0.875   0.704   0.491   0.6933   008   C   002   7-1   8-1   SUNYAC   Oneonta State
E   003   0.800   0.667   0.504   0.6594   017   C   006   4-1   7-1   UAA      Rochester
E   004   0.833   0.583   0.539   0.6348   028   A   C     5-1   6-2   E8       Ithaca
E   005   0.833   0.563   0.568   0.6317   031   C   012   5-1   6-2   SUNYAC   Cortland State
E   006   0.833   0.531   0.566   0.6155   041   C   020   5-1   6-1   E8       Stevens
E   007   1.000   0.444   0.549   0.6094   047   C   024   8-0   10-0  AMCC     Medaille
E   008   0.833   0.526   0.498   0.5961   067   A         5-1   7-1   LL       Skidmore
                                    
A   001   0.857   0.623   0.520   0.6556   019   A   C     6-1   7-3   NJAC     Montclair State
A   002   0.625   0.698   0.514   0.6339   029   C   010   5-3   6-3   NJAC     Richard Stockton
A   003   0.714   0.636   0.477   0.6159   039   A   C     5-2   5-2   LAND     Merchant Marine
A   004   0.833   0.548   0.523   0.6129   043   A   C-2   5-1   6-1   CUNYAC   Baruch
A   005   0.833   0.514   0.558   0.6046   052   A   C-2   5-1   7-1   SKY      St. Josephs (L.I.)
A   006   0.778   0.533   0.555   0.5999   060   C   033   7-2   8-2   NJAC     Rowan
A   007   0.889   0.452   0.578   0.5926   070   C   040   8-1   8-2   NJAC     Ramapo
A   008   0.444   0.726   0.453   0.5873   073   C   043   4-5   5-5   CUNYAC   York (N.Y.)
                                    
MA   01   0.857   0.720   0.515   0.7030   007   A   C     6-1   6-3   MACF     Alvernia
MA   02   0.667   0.744   0.527   0.6703   011   A   C     4-2   5-4   MACC     Messiah
MA   03   0.875   0.617   0.545   0.6634   015   A   C     7-1   9-1   CAC      York (Pa.)
MA   04   0.875   0.543   0.646   0.6519   021   C   008   7-1   8-1   MACC     Albright
MA   05   0.727   0.625   0.551   0.6321   030   C   011   8-3   8-3   MACC     Elizabethtown
MA   06   0.778   0.589   0.512   0.6170   038   C   018   7-2   8-2   CAC      St. Marys (Md.)
MA   07   0.625   0.642   0.540   0.6121   044   C   022   5-3   6-4   LAND     Susquehanna
MA   08   0.750   0.564   0.546   0.6057   050   A   C-2   6-2   6-2   CC       Franklin and Marshall
                                    
S   001   1.000   0.586   0.491   0.6658   013   A   C     5-0   8-0   ODAC     Randolph-Macon
S   002   1.000   0.545   0.561   0.6630   016   C   005   5-0   8-1   ODAC     Eastern Mennonite
S   003   1.000   0.541   0.523   0.6511   022   N/A       6-0   8-0   SCAC     Birmingham-Southern
S   004   0.714   0.732   0.411   0.6472   023   A   C     5-2   7-2   ASC      McMurry
S   005   0.889   0.475   0.576   0.6035   053   C   026   8-1   8-1   ODAC     Guilford
S   006   0.714   0.643   0.402   0.6004   059   C   032   5-2   5-2   ASC      Mary Hardin-Baylor
S   007   0.875   0.471   0.578   0.5986   063   C   035   7-1   9-1   ODAC     Virginia Wesleyan
S   008   0.750   0.500   0.599   0.5872   074   C   044   6-2   7-2   ASC      Texas-Dallas
S   009   0.667   0.564   0.536   0.5824   080   C   049   6-3   6-3   UAA      Emory
S   010   0.750   0.509   0.553   0.5804   083   B   003   6-2   8-2   GSAC     Maryville (Tenn.)
S   011   0.600   0.577   0.516   0.5675   106   C   069   3-2   4-3   ODAC     Roanoke
                                    
GL   01   1.000   0.833   0.591   0.8144   001   A   C     2-0   5-4   MIAA     Hope
GL   02   1.000   0.567   0.568   0.6757   010   A   C     9-0   10-1  OAC      Wilmington
GL   03   0.000   1.000   0.625   0.6563   018   C   007   0-1   3-5   MIAA     Calvin
GL   04   0.778   0.594   0.543   0.6270   032   C   013   7-2   7-2   OAC      John Carroll
GL   05   0.714   0.634   0.514   0.6240   035   C   015   5-2   6-2   UAA      Case Western Reserve
GL   06   0.714   0.613   0.502   0.6105   045   A   C-2   5-2   5-2   AMCC     Penn State-Behrend
GL   07   0.571   0.680   0.480   0.6029   054   C   027   4-3   4-3   UAA      Carnegie Mellon
GL   08   0.556   0.672   0.492   0.5978   065   C   036   5-4   5-5   OAC      Mount Union
GL   09   0.750   0.547   0.545   0.5973   066   C   037   6-2   6-2   AMCC     Frostburg State
                                    
MW   01   1.000   0.667   0.557   0.7227   003   A   C     5-0   8-0   UAA      Washington U.
MW   02   0.800   0.684   0.552   0.6802   009   A   C     4-1   7-2   CCIW     Carthage
MW   03   0.714   0.629   0.574   0.6363   027   C   009   5-2   6-2   CCIW     Wheaton (Ill.)
MW   04   0.778   0.574   0.577   0.6256   034   C   014   7-2   7-3   CCIW     Augustana
MW   05   0.750   0.571   0.570   0.6156   040   C   019   6-2   7-2   CCIW     Illinois Wesleyan
MW   06   0.571   0.640   0.568   0.6047   051   A   C-2   4-3   4-3   MWC      Carroll
MW   07   1.000   0.409   0.590   0.6021   056   C   029   6-0   7-0   MWC      St. Norbert
MW   08   0.714   0.558   0.567   0.5995   061   C   034   5-2   6-2   MWC      Illinois College
MW   09   0.889   0.492   0.523   0.5987   062   A         8-1   9-1   HCAC     Anderson
MW   10   0.375   0.717   0.532   0.5851   077   A         3-5   3-6   NATHC    Wisconsin Lutheran
MW   11   0.667   0.561   0.550   0.5846   078   C   047   4-2   6-2   UAA      Chicago
                                    
W   001   1.000   0.658   0.584   0.7249   002   A   C     11-0  11-0  WIAC     UW-Whitewater
W   002   0.889   0.694   0.605   0.7203   004   C   001   8-1   8-2   WIAC     UW-La Crosse
W   003   1.000   0.654   0.527   0.7086   006   A   C     4-0   7-0   MIAC     St. Thomas
W   004   0.900   0.587   0.593   0.6669   012   C   003   9-1   9-1   WIAC     UW-Stevens Point
W   005   0.857   0.617   0.567   0.6647   014   C   004   6-1   6-1   MIAC     Gustavus Adolphus
W   006   0.909   0.538   0.577   0.6407   025   B   001   10-1  10-1  IND      Chapman
W   007   1.000   0.509   0.535   0.6385   026   A   C     8-0   9-1   IIAC     Cornell
W   008   0.714   0.587   0.553   0.6104   046   C   023   5-2   7-3   WIAC     UW-Platteville
W   009   0.667   0.622   0.457   0.5920   071   C   041   4-2   5-3   MIAC     St. Johns
W   010   0.667   0.575   0.504   0.5802   084   C   051   4-2   4-2   MIAC     Augsburg
W   011   0.667   0.579   0.494   0.5798   085   C   052   4-2   5-4   IIAC     Buena Vista
W   012   0.200   0.800   0.517   0.5793   088   C   054   1-4   4-6   WIAC     UW-Stout
                                    
      Pool:   A   Top ranked team in Pool A eligible conference                        
         B   Pool B eligible team                        
         C   At large candidate                        
         N/A   Not eligible for postseason participation                        
                                    
      B or C #      Rank in Pool (C or B)                        
                                    
      A Status:   C   Pool A candidate, would rank within top 19 of Pool C                         
         C-2   2nd tier Pool A candidate, would rank 20-29 of Pool C                         
         Blank   Ranks outside of the top 29 of Pool C                        

[Hugenerd]

It's like all the way down in the sixties here in L.A.  Brrrrr.  But unlike Ralph, I'm not a whiny baby.  

I don't know about the rest of you, but I think there's some amount of irony in hugenerd finding another hole in the NCAA's goofy arbitrary-200-mile-limited-travel-restriction-based ranking schema while traveling somewhere on a commercial airline.   

I was just in LA...for about 2.5 hours.  Now in San Diego and it is nice!  Pleasant change from the Boston December weather to this.

[Hugenerd]

Here is a question for anyone who has any thoughts.  I didnt read the handbook myself, but below is a quote from the Pool B board:

Those interested in OWP and OOWP should read the section on strength of schedule.  For 2010 and 2011 they will be using a weighted average of 2/3 OWP and 1/3 OOWP.  I believe this is a fairly significant change from years passed if memory serves me correctly.

So 2/3 OWP, 1/3 OOWP is standard in RPI (.25 WP, .5 OWP, .25 OOWP, OWP is weighted twice as much as OOWP), but it is not explicitly stated how WP is going to be utilized.  If both WP and (OWP, OOWP) are primary criteria and are weighted equally, would that mean that D3 RPI would be an average of the WP and (2/3 OWP, 1/3 OOWP) numbers.  In other words, would d3 RPI be more like 0.5WP + 0.5(2/3)OWP + 0.5 (1/3) OOWP = 0.5 WP+1/3OWP+1/6OOWP? Obviously, how you use WP will make a huge difference on the way you would rank each team.

Anyone have any thoughts?

[KnightSlappy]

My thought has been that nothing is actually changing for rpi. The selection comittee is just confirming how they will be using owp and oowp in relation to each other (and that the relationship is the same as the traditional rpi calculation). It's also important to note that the handbook hasn't stated that an actual rpi number is used in the official number. We'll have to see how the official rankings compare to the calculated values when they come out.

It's my understanding that Mr Abegg used rpi as the primary factor in his calculations and he was nearly always spot on.

[Pat Coleman]

Thanks -- if you have any more corrections please chime in. I've made those changes and now that I have a little more time I will be starting my usual audit of games myself.

[Hugenerd]

My thought has been that nothing is actually changing for rpi. The selection comittee is just confirming how they will be using owp and oowp in relation to each other (and that the relationship is the same as the traditional rpi calculation). It's also important to note that the handbook hasn't stated that an actual rpi number is used in the official number. We'll have to see how the official rankings compare to the calculated values when they come out.

It's my understanding that Mr Abegg used rpi as the primary factor in his calculations and he was nearly always spot on.

Not now, but when rankings start coming out in February, it may be interesting to see how the actual rankings compare with the numbers calculated either way.  I am sure it will make some difference depending on the weighting used for each value in the rankings, but it may not be  more than a few teams swapped here and there.  Obviously not something that must be done but it could be interesting to see what happens.

Mr. Abegg did use pure RPI, but he did adjust teams in his official rankings according to head-to-head results (which is also a primary criteria).  For example, when he calculated the RPI, if the rankings were 1. Team A, 2. Team B, and 3. Team C and Team B was 1-0 vs. Team A during the season, his rankings would be 1. Team B, 2. Team A, and 3. Team C.  By doing these types of adjustments he was always very accurate.

[KnightSlappy]

Through games of Sunday 1/3/2010 -- includes results reported on d3hoops.com at 11:00 p.m. EST on Sunday night.

REG   #   WP      OWP     OOWP    RPI      NAT   Pool        REG     OVR   CONF     Team
                                    
NE   01   0.857   0.639   0.504   0.6598   012   A   C       6-1     7-1   NAC      Thomas
NE   02   1.000   0.552   0.516   0.6548   014   A   C       5-0     9-0   NESCAC   Middlebury
NE   03   0.600   0.655   0.562   0.6180   037   C   016     3-2     5-4   NESCAC   Bates
NE   04   0.800   0.570   0.526   0.6162   040   A   C       8-2     8-2   LEC      Eastern Connecticut
NE   05   0.500   0.727   0.477   0.6079   044   C   020     2-2     4-3   NAC      Husson
NE   06   0.875   0.492   0.539   0.5993   051   C   025     7-1     8-1   LEC      Western Connecticut
NE   07   0.750   0.538   0.546   0.5933   060   C   034     6-2     7-2   NESCAC   Bowdoin
NE   08   1.000   0.394   0.574   0.5908   065   A          10-0    11-1   NEWMAC   MIT
NE   09   0.600   0.625   0.511   0.5901   067   C   039     6-4     6-4   LEC      Mass-Dartmouth
NE   10   0.875   0.433   0.610   0.5879   072   C   042     7-1     7-1   UAA      Brandeis
NE   11   0.667   0.585   0.489   0.5817   075   B   003     4-2     6-2   NECC     Elms
NE   12   0.900   0.408   0.601   0.5792   079   C   048     9-1    10-1   NEWMAC   Worcester Polytech
NE   13   0.833   0.439   0.592   0.5759   085   C   053     5-1     7-2   NESCAC   Colby
NE   14   0.714   0.543   0.487   0.5721   090   A           5-2     6-4   CCC      Colby-Sawyer
                                    
E   001   1.000   0.667   0.492   0.7063   005   A   C       6-0     7-1   SUNYAC   Plattsburgh State
E   002   0.875   0.678   0.493   0.6810   007   C   003     7-1     8-1   SUNYAC   Oneonta State
E   003   0.800   0.639   0.527   0.6511   017   C   006     4-1     7-1   UAA      Rochester
E   004   0.833   0.563   0.580   0.6347   023   C   009     5-1     6-2   SUNYAC   Cortland State
E   005   0.833   0.548   0.545   0.6184   036   A   C       5-1     8-2   E8       Ithaca
E   006   1.000   0.452   0.553   0.6143   041   A   C      10-0    12-0   AMCC     Medaille
E   007   0.778   0.565   0.548   0.6141   042   C   019     7-2     8-2   UAA      New York University
E   008   0.750   0.544   0.539   0.5941   057   C   031     6-2     7-3   E8       Nazareth
                                    
A   001   0.875   0.588   0.514   0.6414   021   A   C       7-1     8-3   NJAC     Montclair State
A   002   0.889   0.548   0.533   0.6296   026   A   C       8-1     9-1   CUNYAC   Baruch
A   003   0.800   0.600   0.503   0.6257   029   A   C       8-2     9-2   LAND     Merchant Marine
A   004   0.700   0.627   0.546   0.6248   030   C   012     7-3     8-3   NJAC     Richard Stockton
A   005   0.833   0.541   0.562   0.6192   034   A   C       5-1     7-1   SKY      St. Josephs (L.I.)
A   006   0.900   0.494   0.584   0.6177   039   C   018     9-1     9-2   NJAC     Ramapo
A   007   0.500   0.720   0.480   0.6048   047   C   021     5-5     7-5   CUNYAC   York (N.Y.)
A   008   0.778   0.523   0.551   0.5936   059   C   033     7-2     8-2   NJAC     Rowan
                                    
MA   01   0.875   0.733   0.530   0.7180   002   A   C       7-1     ---   MACC     Alvernia
MA   02   0.900   0.609   0.586   0.6758   009   C   004     9-1    10-1   MACC     Albright
MA   03   0.900   0.603   0.563   0.6671   010   A   C       9-1    11-1   CAC      York (Pa.)
MA   04   0.714   0.672   0.535   0.6485   018   C   007     5-2     6-4   MACC     Messiah
MA   05   0.727   0.638   0.533   0.6339   025   C   010     8-3     8-3   MACC     Elizabethtown
MA   06   0.800   0.571   0.575   0.6294   027   A   C       8-2     8-2   CC       Franklin and Marshall
MA   07   0.714   0.627   0.535   0.6261   028   C   011     5-2     6-3   CC       McDaniel
MA   08   0.800   0.573   0.533   0.6198   033   C   014     8-2    10-2   CAC      St. Marys (Md.)
                                    
S   001   1.000   0.532   0.545   0.6523   016   A   C       6-0     9-1   ODAC     Eastern Mennonite
S   002   1.000   0.563   0.466   0.6477   020   C   008     4-0    10-0   ODAC     Randolph-Macon
S   003   0.714   0.681   0.421   0.6243   031   A   C       5-2     7-3   ASC      McMurry
S   004   0.875   0.538   0.490   0.6104   043   N/A         7-1     9-1   SCAC     Birmingham-Southern
S   005   0.889   0.468   0.564   0.5970   055   C   029     8-1    10-1   ODAC     Virginia Wesleyan
S   006   0.667   0.629   0.458   0.5955   056   C   030     6-3     6-4   ASC      Mary Hardin-Baylor
S   007   0.750   0.525   0.577   0.5941   058   C   032     6-2     7-3   ASC      Texas-Dallas
S   008   0.909   0.440   0.578   0.5921   061   C   035    10-1    10-1   ODAC     Guilford
S   009   0.750   0.543   0.523   0.5897   068   B   002     6-2    10-2   GSAC     Maryville (Tenn.)
S   010   0.778   0.500   0.549   0.5816   076   C   045     7-2     8-2   ODAC     Washington and Lee
S   011   0.727   0.551   0.474   0.5758   086   A           8-3     8-3   SCAC     Austin
                                    
GL   01   1.000   0.800   0.494   0.7736   001   A   C       2-0     7-4   MIAA     Hope
GL   02   0.900   0.571   0.550   0.6482   019   A   C       9-1    10-2   OAC      Wilmington
GL   03   0.778   0.561   0.501   0.5999   050   C   024     7-2     8-3   UAA      Case Western Reserve
GL   04   0.500   0.708   0.476   0.5980   053   C   027     4-4     4-4   UAA      Carnegie Mellon
GL   05   0.750   0.564   0.488   0.5916   063   C   036     6-2     6-3   AMCC     Penn State-Behrend
GL   06   0.600   0.631   0.503   0.5913   064   C   037     6-4     7-4   OAC      John Carroll
GL   07   0.750   0.476   0.586   0.5720   091   C   056     6-2     8-4   OAC      Heidelberg
GL   08   0.545   0.618   0.495   0.5694   093   C   058     6-5     7-5   OAC      Baldwin-Wallace
GL   09   0.500   0.623   0.506   0.5632   104   C   067     5-5     5-7   OAC      Mount Union
                                    
MW   01   0.800   0.674   0.560   0.6773   008   A   C       4-1     8-3   CCIW     Carthage
MW   02   0.857   0.614   0.528   0.6533   015   A   C       6-1     9-1   UAA      Washington U.
MW   03   0.800   0.571   0.532   0.6186   035   C   015     8-2     9-2   CCIW     Illinois Wesleyan
MW   04   0.571   0.649   0.552   0.6053   045   A   C-2     4-3     6-3   MWC      Carroll
MW   05   0.833   0.540   0.489   0.6005   049   C   023     5-1     6-5   CCIW     North Central (Ill.)
MW   06   0.833   0.494   0.545   0.5918   062   A          10-2    11-2   HCAC     Defiance
MW   07   0.375   0.716   0.550   0.5895   069   A           3-5     3-6   NATHC    Wisconsin Lutheran
MW   08   0.900   0.488   0.480   0.5886   071   C   041     9-1    11-1   HCAC     Anderson
MW   09   0.875   0.437   0.562   0.5776   082   C   051     7-1     8-1   MWC      St. Norbert
MW   10   0.700   0.512   0.580   0.5760   083   C   052     7-3     7-4   CCIW     Augustana
MW   11   0.700   0.507   0.571   0.5715   092   C   057     7-3     8-3   CCIW     Wheaton (Ill.)
                                    
W   001   0.923   0.667   0.573   0.7073   003   A   C      12-1    12-1   WIAC     UW-Whitewater
W   002   0.909   0.651   0.616   0.7068   004   C   001    10-1    11-2   WIAC     UW-La Crosse
W   003   0.909   0.643   0.582   0.6942   006   C   002    10-1    11-1   WIAC     UW-Stevens Point
W   004   0.833   0.647   0.534   0.6653   011   A   C       5-1     8-1   MIAC     St. Thomas
W   005   0.857   0.603   0.560   0.6561   013   C   005     6-1     6-3   MIAC     Gustavus Adolphus
W   006   0.909   0.565   0.503   0.6355   022   B   001    10-1    11-2   IND      Chapman
W   007   0.778   0.591   0.578   0.6345   024   A   C       7-2     9-2   NWC      Whitworth
W   008   0.750   0.597   0.540   0.6210   032   C   013     6-2     6-2   MIAC     Augsburg
W   009   0.750   0.582   0.558   0.6179   038   C   017     6-2     8-4   WIAC     UW-Platteville
W   010   0.625   0.651   0.494   0.6051   046   A   C-2     5-3     7-5   IIAC     Buena Vista
W   011   0.714   0.590   0.499   0.5984   052   C   026     5-2     6-3   MIAC     St. Johns
W   012   0.333   0.762   0.505   0.5906   066   C   038     1-2     2-8   NWC      Lewis and Clark
                                    
      Pool:   A   Top ranked team in Pool A eligible conference                        
         B   Pool B eligible team                        
         C   At large candidate                        
         N/A   Not eligible for postseason participation                        
                                    
      B or C #      Rank in Pool (C or B)                        
                                    
      A Status:   C   Pool A candidate, would rank within top 19 of Pool C                         
         C-2   2nd tier Pool A candidate, would rank 20-29 of Pool C                         
         Blank   Ranks outside of the top 29 of Pool C