Pool C

Titan Q · January 04, 2010, 02:59:51 PM

Knight, what weight did you assign to in-region winning % vs strength of schedule? These numbers seem unrealistic. For example, 3-5 Wisc Lutheran ahead of 9-1 Anderson? There's just no way. In reality, about 90% of the selection process seems to come down to in-region winning %.

KnightSlappy · January 04, 2010, 03:35:42 PM

Quote from: Titan Q on January 04, 2010, 02:59:51 PM
Knight, what weight did you assign to in-region winning % vs strength of schedule? These numbers seem unrealistic. For example, 3-5 Wisc Lutheran ahead of 9-1 Anderson? There's just no way. In reality, about 90% of the selection process seems to come down to in-region winning %.

I use the standard RPI calculation of 0.25 x WP + 0.75 x SOS

Wisc Lutheran has had the 5^th toughest schedule while Anderson has had the 251^st toughest schedule.

magicman · January 04, 2010, 05:32:36 PM

KnightSlappy,
Williams has a regional record of 8-0. That doesn't get them on the Northeast list?
Or is their SOS so bad that its keeping them off?

KnightSlappy · January 04, 2010, 06:19:37 PM

Quote from: magicman on January 04, 2010, 05:32:36 PM
KnightSlappy,
Williams has a regional record of 8-0. That doesn't get them on the Northeast list?
Or is their SOS so bad that its keeping them off?

Williams sits 17th in the NE region, it is indeed the 0.333 OWP that is keeping them down.

Mississippi College is 21 in the South despite a 6-0 in region record thanks to their 0.2195 OWP.

The extremely high (and low) strength of schedules will (should) regress toward 0.500 as the season progresses.

Hugenerd · January 04, 2010, 06:30:13 PM

Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 04, 2010, 06:19:37 PM
Quote from: magicman on January 04, 2010, 05:32:36 PM
KnightSlappy,
Williams has a regional record of 8-0. That doesn't get them on the Northeast list?
Or is their SOS so bad that its keeping them off?

Williams sits 17th in the NE region, it is indeed the 0.333 OWP that is keeping them down.

Mississippi College is 21 in the South despite a 6-0 in region record thanks to their 0.2195 regional percentage.

The extremely high (and low) strength of schedules will (should) regress toward 0.500 as the season progresses.

Exactly.

Dont get too caught up in these numbers. At this point in the season, where most teams have played 10 region games or less, and almost no conference games, these rankings are more about the teams you have played than your actual performance. The numbers will work themselves out as the season progresses (Knight is using the standard RPI formula, you can wikipedia it if you would like). As stated, all the SOS numbers will move toward .500 as the conference seasons begin. By seasons end, every team in the ASC will have a SOS of 0.500 plus or minus 0.01 (as will any other conference that plays most of its games in conference). Right now these numbers just dont mean a whole lot, other than for some interesting conversation.

Hugenerd · January 17, 2010, 12:57:08 AM

Knight, will you be posting new RPI numbers any time soon? I am just curious how they have changed over the past two weeks.

KnightSlappy · January 17, 2010, 01:50:37 PM

Quote from: hugenerd on January 17, 2010, 12:57:08 AM
Knight, will you be posting new RPI numbers any time soon? I am just curious how they have changed over the past two weeks.

** Updated to include Sunday's results**

Numbers include regional results only.

REG   #   WP     OWP    OOWP    RPI     NAT   Pool        REG     OVR   CONF    Team

NE   01   0.909   0.549   0.548   0.6388   010   A   C     10-1    14-1   NESCAC   Middlebury
NE   02   1.000   0.481   0.532   0.6236   015   A   C     14-0    15-1   NEWMAC   MIT
NE   03   0.846   0.507   0.591   0.6129   022   C   011    11-2    11-2   UAA     Brandeis
NE   04   0.889   0.494   0.553   0.6076   026   C   014     8-1    10-2   NESCAC   Colby
NE   05   0.800   0.536   0.529   0.6005   032   A   C     12-3    12-3   LEC     Eastern Connecticut
NE   06   1.000   0.407   0.559   0.5935   042   C   023    12-0    14-1   NESCAC   Williams
NE   07   0.667   0.586   0.511   0.5871   050   C   028    10-5    10-5   LEC     Mass-Dartmouth
NE   08   0.700   0.539   0.545   0.5807   060   A           7-3     8-5   MASCAC   Bridgewater State
NE   09   0.786   0.503   0.530   0.5804   062   C   033    11-3    12-3   NEWMAC   Worcester Polytech
NE   10   0.625   0.579   0.505   0.5719   074   A           5-3     8-4   NAC     Husson
NE   11   0.750   0.496   0.516   0.5646   085   A           9-3    10-3   CCC     Gordon
NE   12   0.400   0.684   0.490   0.5643   086   C   050     4-6     6-8   NESCAC   Bates
NE   13   0.778   0.451   0.560   0.5600   092   C   055     7-2     8-2   NAC     Thomas
NE   14   0.750   0.483   0.517   0.5583   093   C   056     9-3    10-3   LEC     Western Connecticut

E   001   0.800   0.609   0.534   0.6380   011   C   005     8-2    12-2   UAA     Rochester
E   002   0.846   0.584   0.531   0.6364   012   A   C     11-2    12-2   SUNYAC   Oneonta State
E   003   0.786   0.531   0.561   0.6023   031   A   C     11-3    12-3   E8    St. John Fisher
E   004   0.714   0.546   0.576   0.5955   038   C   020    10-4    11-5   E8    Nazareth
E   005   0.625   0.625   0.503   0.5946   040   C   021     5-3     8-4   SUNYAC   Brockport State
E   006   0.692   0.565   0.555   0.5942   041   C   022     9-4    10-4   UAA     New York University
E   007   0.750   0.551   0.520   0.5927   043   C   024     9-3    12-4   E8    Ithaca
E   008   0.636   0.620   0.484   0.5904   045   C   025     7-4     8-5   SUNYAC   Plattsburgh State

A   001   0.938   0.492   0.548   0.6175   019   A   C     15-1    15-1   NJAC    William Paterson
A   002   0.733   0.599   0.538   0.6172   020   C   009    11-4    12-4   NJAC    Richard Stockton
A   003   0.643   0.642   0.500   0.6065   028   A   C      9-5    11-5   CUNYAC   York (N.Y.)
A   004   0.786   0.559   0.495   0.5997   035   A   C     11-3    12-3   LAND    Merchant Marine
A   005   0.857   0.482   0.534   0.5888   048   C   027    12-2    13-2   CUNYAC   Baruch
A   006   0.667   0.580   0.517   0.5858   053   C   029     8-4    11-4   NJAC    Rowan
A   007   0.800   0.476   0.563   0.5788   063   C   034    12-3    12-4   NJAC    Ramapo
A   008   0.667   0.565   0.518   0.5785   064   C   035     8-4    11-5   NJAC    Rutgers-Newark

MA   01   0.857   0.669   0.529   0.6810   002   A   C     12-2    13-2   MACC    Albright
MA   02   0.727   0.672   0.542   0.6533   005   C   002     8-3     9-5   MACC    Messiah
MA   03   0.833   0.613   0.550   0.6525   006   C   003    10-2     ---   MACC    Alvernia
MA   04   0.846   0.531   0.541   0.6121   023   A   C     11-2    13-2   CAC     St. Marys (Md.)
MA   05   0.846   0.523   0.540   0.6080   025   C   013    11-2    13-2   MACC    Lycoming
MA   06   0.733   0.581   0.534   0.6071   027   C   015    11-4    11-4   MACC    Elizabethtown
MA   07   0.786   0.547   0.522   0.6002   033   C   017    11-3    13-3   CAC     York (Pa.)
MA   08   0.615   0.642   0.496   0.5990   036   C   019     8-5    10-6   LAND    Susquehanna

S   001   1.000   0.579   0.514   0.6680   004   A   C     10-0    13-1   ODAC    Eastern Mennonite
S   002   0.933   0.500   0.544   0.6194   017   C   007    14-1    14-1   ODAC    Guilford
S   003   0.857   0.542   0.531   0.6181   018   C   008    12-2    14-2   ODAC    Virginia Wesleyan
S   004   0.889   0.517   0.531   0.6134   021   C   010     8-1    14-1   ODAC    Randolph-Macon
S   005   0.818   0.526   0.513   0.5960   037   B   001     9-2    14-2   GSAC    Maryville (Tenn.)
S   006   0.733   0.566   0.490   0.5891   047   A   C-2    11-4    11-4   SCAC    Austin
S   007   0.818   0.516   0.496   0.5864   051   N/A         9-2    13-2   SCAC    Birmingham-Southern
S   008   0.714   0.553   0.488   0.5773   068   A          10-4    10-5   ASC     Mary Hardin-Baylor
S   009   0.846   0.465   0.526   0.5753   070   C   039    11-2    12-3   ASC     Texas-Dallas
S   010   0.692   0.531   0.520   0.5687   078   C   044     9-4    10-4   UAA     Emory
S   011   0.786   0.463   0.513   0.5563   096   C   057    11-3    12-4   SCAC    Southwestern

GL   01   0.833   0.543   0.504   0.6061   029   A   C      5-1     9-6   MIAA    Calvin
GL   02   0.786   0.528   0.524   0.5914   044   A   C-2    11-3    12-4   OAC     Wilmington
GL   03   0.833   0.500   0.494   0.5817   058   C   031    10-2    10-3   AMCC    Penn State-Behrend
GL   04   0.786   0.477   0.539   0.5700   075   A          11-3    11-4   NCAC    Wooster
GL   05   0.643   0.570   0.495   0.5695   077   C   043     9-5    10-5   OAC     John Carroll
GL   06   0.727   0.496   0.554   0.5684   079   C   045     8-3    10-5   OAC     Heidelberg
GL   07   0.778   0.484   0.502   0.5619   090   C   053     7-2    10-5   MIAA    Albion
GL   08   0.750   0.490   0.486   0.5537   105   A          12-4    12-4   PrAC    Thomas Moore
GL   09   0.667   0.515   0.516   0.5532   106   C   066     8-4     9-5   UAA     Case Western Reserve

MW   01   0.778   0.634   0.563   0.6521   007   A   C      7-2    11-4   CCIW    Carthage
MW   02   0.818   0.625   0.536   0.6510   008   A   C      9-2    12-2   UAA     Washington U.
MW   03   0.857   0.574   0.536   0.6353   013   C   006    12-2    13-2   CCIW    Illinois Wesleyan
MW   04   0.800   0.518   0.501   0.5843   056   A          12-3    13-3   HCAC    Defiance
MW   05   0.917   0.408   0.545   0.5696   076   A          11-1    12-1   MWC     St. Norbert
MW   06   0.929   0.424   0.497   0.5683   080   C   046    13-1    15-1   HCAC    Anderson
MW   07   0.643   0.535   0.554   0.5665   082   C   048     9-5    10-5   CCIW    Wheaton (Ill.)
MW   08   0.909   0.402   0.513   0.5564   095   A          10-1    11-4   SLIAC    Westminster (Mo.)
MW   09   0.417   0.653   0.499   0.5552   099   C   060     5-7     7-7   UAA     Chicago
MW   10   0.533   0.595   0.491   0.5537   104   C   065     8-7     9-7   HCAC    Transylvania
MW   11   0.643   0.506   0.557   0.5531   107   C   067     9-5     9-6   CCIW    Augustana

W   001   0.933   0.626   0.568   0.6886   001   A   C     14-1    15-1   WIAC    UW-Stevens Point
W   002   0.875   0.624   0.555   0.6694   003   C   001    14-2    14-2   WIAC    UW-Whitewater
W   003   0.786   0.608   0.570   0.6431   009   C   004    11-3    12-4   WIAC    UW-La Crosse
W   004   0.818   0.584   0.537   0.6309   014   A   C      9-2    12-2   MIAC    St. Thomas
W   005   0.846   0.533   0.572   0.6213   016   A   C     11-2    13-2   NWC     Whitworth
W   006   0.833   0.534   0.531   0.6083   024   C   012    10-2    10-4   MIAC    Gustavus Adolphus
W   007   0.667   0.591   0.564   0.6034   030   C   016     8-4    10-6   WIAC    UW-Platteville
W   008   0.769   0.551   0.529   0.5998   034   C   018    10-3    10-3   MIAC    Augsburg
W   009   0.667   0.576   0.538   0.5892   046   C   026     8-4     9-5   MIAC    St. Johns
W   010   0.833   0.507   0.503   0.5877   049   A   C-2    10-2    11-4   IIAC    Cornell
W   011   0.923   0.453   0.496   0.5814   059   B   002    12-1    14-2   IND     Chapman
W   012   1.000   0.362   0.583   0.5765   069   C   038     6-0     8-6   NWC     Linfield

      Pool:   A   Top ranked team in Pool A eligible conference
         B   Pool B eligible team
         C   At large candidate
         N/A   Not eligible for postseason participation

      B or C #      Rank in Pool (C or B)

      A Status:   C   Pool A candidate, would rank within top 19 of Pool C
         C-2   2nd tier Pool A candidate, would rank 20-29 of Pool C
         Blank   Ranks outside of the top 29 of Pool C

      Updated:   1/17/2010

Hugenerd · January 17, 2010, 02:23:33 PM

Thanks.

KnightSlappy · January 17, 2010, 10:06:52 PM

I updated my previous regional ranking post to include games through Sunday.

sac · January 17, 2010, 10:55:51 PM

Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 17, 2010, 01:50:37 PM
Quote from: hugenerd on January 17, 2010, 12:57:08 AM
Knight, will you be posting new RPI numbers any time soon? I am just curious how they have changed over the past two weeks.

** Updated to include Sunday's results**

Numbers include regional results only.

REG   #   WP     OWP    OOWP    RPI     NAT   Pool        REG     OVR   CONF    Team


MW   01   0.778   0.634   0.563   0.6521   007   A   C      7-2    11-4   CCIW    Carthage
MW   02   0.818   0.625   0.536   0.6510   008   A   C      9-2    12-2   UAA     Washington U.
MW   03   0.857   0.574   0.536   0.6353   013   C   006    12-2    13-2   CCIW    Illinois Wesleyan
MW   04   0.800   0.518   0.501   0.5843   056   A          12-3    13-3   HCAC    Defiance
MW   05   0.917   0.408   0.545   0.5696   076   A          11-1    12-1   MWC     St. Norbert
MW   06   0.929   0.424   0.497   0.5683   080   C   046    13-1    15-1   HCAC    Anderson
MW   07   0.643   0.535   0.554   0.5665   082   C   048     9-5    10-5   CCIW    Wheaton (Ill.)
MW   08   0.909   0.402   0.513   0.5564   095   A          10-1    11-4   SLIAC    Westminster (Mo.)
MW   09   0.417   0.653   0.499   0.5552   099   C   060     5-7     7-7   UAA     Chicago
MW   10   0.533   0.595   0.491   0.5537   104   C   065     8-7     9-7   HCAC    Transylvania
MW   11   0.643   0.506   0.557   0.5531   107   C   067     9-5     9-6   CCIW    Augustana

Not sure how you are calculating A and C representatives or if it even matters but......

You've got Defiance listed as the 'A' representative from the HCAC, but Anderson currently has a 3 game lead on the Yellowjackets in the HCAC standings

http://www.heartlandconf.org/sports/mbkb/index

KnightSlappy · January 18, 2010, 09:35:30 AM

Quote from: sac on January 17, 2010, 10:55:51 PM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 17, 2010, 01:50:37 PM
Quote from: hugenerd on January 17, 2010, 12:57:08 AM
Knight, will you be posting new RPI numbers any time soon? I am just curious how they have changed over the past two weeks.

** Updated to include Sunday's results**

Numbers include regional results only.

REG   #   WP     OWP    OOWP    RPI     NAT   Pool        REG     OVR   CONF    Team


MW   01   0.778   0.634   0.563   0.6521   007   A   C      7-2    11-4   CCIW    Carthage
MW   02   0.818   0.625   0.536   0.6510   008   A   C      9-2    12-2   UAA     Washington U.
MW   03   0.857   0.574   0.536   0.6353   013   C   006    12-2    13-2   CCIW    Illinois Wesleyan
MW   04   0.800   0.518   0.501   0.5843   056   A          12-3    13-3   HCAC    Defiance
MW   05   0.917   0.408   0.545   0.5696   076   A          11-1    12-1   MWC     St. Norbert
MW   06   0.929   0.424   0.497   0.5683   080   C   046    13-1    15-1   HCAC    Anderson
MW   07   0.643   0.535   0.554   0.5665   082   C   048     9-5    10-5   CCIW    Wheaton (Ill.)
MW   08   0.909   0.402   0.513   0.5564   095   A          10-1    11-4   SLIAC    Westminster (Mo.)
MW   09   0.417   0.653   0.499   0.5552   099   C   060     5-7     7-7   UAA     Chicago
MW   10   0.533   0.595   0.491   0.5537   104   C   065     8-7     9-7   HCAC    Transylvania
MW   11   0.643   0.506   0.557   0.5531   107   C   067     9-5     9-6   CCIW    Augustana



Not sure how you are calculating A and C representatives or if it even matters but......

You've got Defiance listed as the 'A' representative from the HCAC, but Anderson currently has a 3 game lead on the Yellowjackets in the HCAC standings

http://www.heartlandconf.org/sports/mbkb/index

I'm using the RPI leader as Pool A representative. Since most conferences award the bid via a tournament, actual standings don't much matter.

Washington U also still has the A bid, but they find themselves down a game too. The UAA may be the only tricky conference for me.

Ralph Turner · January 18, 2010, 01:15:57 PM

Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 18, 2010, 09:35:30 AM
Quote from: sac on January 17, 2010, 10:55:51 PM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 17, 2010, 01:50:37 PM
Quote from: hugenerd on January 17, 2010, 12:57:08 AM
Knight, will you be posting new RPI numbers any time soon? I am just curious how they have changed over the past two weeks.

** Updated to include Sunday's results**

Numbers include regional results only.

REG   #   WP     OWP    OOWP    RPI     NAT   Pool        REG     OVR   CONF    Team


MW   01   0.778   0.634   0.563   0.6521   007   A   C      7-2    11-4   CCIW    Carthage
MW   02   0.818   0.625   0.536   0.6510   008   A   C      9-2    12-2   UAA     Washington U.
MW   03   0.857   0.574   0.536   0.6353   013   C   006    12-2    13-2   CCIW    Illinois Wesleyan
MW   04   0.800   0.518   0.501   0.5843   056   A          12-3    13-3   HCAC    Defiance
MW   05   0.917   0.408   0.545   0.5696   076   A          11-1    12-1   MWC     St. Norbert
MW   06   0.929   0.424   0.497   0.5683   080   C   046    13-1    15-1   HCAC    Anderson
MW   07   0.643   0.535   0.554   0.5665   082   C   048     9-5    10-5   CCIW    Wheaton (Ill.)
MW   08   0.909   0.402   0.513   0.5564   095   A          10-1    11-4   SLIAC    Westminster (Mo.)
MW   09   0.417   0.653   0.499   0.5552   099   C   060     5-7     7-7   UAA     Chicago
MW   10   0.533   0.595   0.491   0.5537   104   C   065     8-7     9-7   HCAC    Transylvania
MW   11   0.643   0.506   0.557   0.5531   107   C   067     9-5     9-6   CCIW    Augustana



Not sure how you are calculating A and C representatives or if it even matters but......

You've got Defiance listed as the 'A' representative from the HCAC, but Anderson currently has a 3 game lead on the Yellowjackets in the HCAC standings

http://www.heartlandconf.org/sports/mbkb/index

I'm using the RPI leader as Pool A representative. Since most conferences award the bid via a tournament, actual standings don't much matter.

Washington U also still has the A bid, but they find themselves down a game too. The UAA may be the only tricky conference for me.

With that disclaimer, then we should not have any problems. Besides, the current RPI leader will need the best ranking that it can get should it not earn the Pool A bid in the tourneys for everyone else except the UAA.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh · January 19, 2010, 10:33:05 PM

Knightslappy... can I throw an idea to you?

I know the NCAA committees are not looking at OWP and OOWP seperately this year or next (and maybe longer). They are using a weighted scale to create a combined number they will use when comparing teams. Any chance you can include that in your report? The equation is (OWP X .667) + (OOWP X .333) = SOS.

Just a thought. I know people will start wondering this kind of thing when the NCAA releases its data... so I thought it might be helpful.

Thanks!

KnightSlappy · January 20, 2010, 08:59:28 AM

Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on January 19, 2010, 10:33:05 PM
Knightslappy... can I throw an idea to you?

I know the NCAA committees are not looking at OWP and OOWP seperately this year or next (and maybe longer). They are using a weighted scale to create a combined number they will use when comparing teams. Any chance you can include that in your report? The equation is (OWP X .667) + (OOWP X .333) = SOS.

Just a thought. I know people will start wondering this kind of thing when the NCAA releases its data... so I thought it might be helpful.

Thanks!

Updated with SOS included.

REG   #   WP     OWP    OOWP    SOS    RPI     NAT   Pool        REG     OVR   CONF    Team

NE   01   0.909   0.545   0.541   0.544   0.6352   012   A   C     10-1    14-1   NESCAC   Middlebury
NE   02   1.000   0.480   0.530   0.497   0.6224   017   A   C     14-0    15-1   NEWMAC   MIT
NE   03   0.846   0.513   0.583   0.536   0.6139   022   C   011    11-2    11-2   UAA     Brandeis
NE   04   0.889   0.484   0.543   0.504   0.6000   030   C   016     8-1    10-2   NESCAC   Colby
NE   05   0.813   0.532   0.523   0.529   0.5999   031   A   C     13-3    13-3   LEC     Eastern Connecticut
NE   06   1.000   0.409   0.553   0.457   0.5927   043   C   023    13-0    15-1   NESCAC   Williams
NE   07   0.727   0.550   0.540   0.547   0.5920   046   A   C-2     8-3     9-5   MASCAC   Bridgewater State
NE   08   0.800   0.519   0.526   0.521   0.5909   048   C   024    12-3    13-3   NEWMAC   Worcester Polytech
NE   09   0.667   0.590   0.486   0.555   0.5832   056   A           8-4     9-5   GNAC    Emerson
NE   10   0.688   0.551   0.516   0.539   0.5762   066   C   034    11-5    11-5   LEC     Mass-Dartmouth
NE   11   0.769   0.474   0.515   0.488   0.5581   091   C   055    10-3    10-4   GNAC    Albertus Magnus
NE   12   0.400   0.673   0.486   0.611   0.5580   092   C   056     4-6     6-8   NESCAC   Bates
NE   13   0.800   0.442   0.548   0.477   0.5579   093   A           8-2     9-2   NAC     Thomas
NE   14   0.750   0.478   0.514   0.490   0.5550   095   A           9-3    10-3   CCC     Gordon

E   001   0.846   0.589   0.532   0.570   0.6388   010   A   C     11-2    12-2   SUNYAC   Oneonta State
E   002   0.800   0.591   0.530   0.571   0.6281   015   C   006     8-2    12-2   UAA     Rochester
E   003   0.769   0.547   0.531   0.542   0.5984   034   A   C     10-3    13-4   E8    Ithaca
E   004   0.714   0.544   0.578   0.555   0.5951   039   C   020    10-4    11-5   E8    Nazareth
E   005   0.800   0.506   0.566   0.526   0.5947   040   C   021    12-3    13-3   E8    St. John Fisher
E   006   0.625   0.624   0.500   0.582   0.5930   041   C   022     5-3     8-4   SUNYAC   Brockport State
E   007   0.929   0.470   0.503   0.481   0.5927   044   A   C-2    13-1    15-1   AMCC    Medaille
E   008   0.692   0.557   0.551   0.555   0.5894   049   C   025     9-4    10-4   UAA     New York University

A   001   0.941   0.516   0.541   0.524   0.6286   014   A   C     16-1    16-1   NJAC    William Paterson
A   002   0.750   0.581   0.545   0.569   0.6144   021   C   010    12-4    13-4   NJAC    Richard Stockton
A   003   0.786   0.552   0.498   0.534   0.5970   037   C   019    11-3    12-3   LAND    Merchant Marine
A   004   0.667   0.596   0.508   0.567   0.5918   047   A   C-2    10-5    12-5   CUNYAC   York (N.Y.)
A   005   0.800   0.516   0.525   0.519   0.5892   050   C   026    12-3    13-3   CUNYAC   Baruch
A   006   0.667   0.580   0.515   0.559   0.5856   053   C   028     8-4    12-4   NJAC    Rowan
A   007   0.615   0.596   0.511   0.568   0.5797   061   C   030     8-5     9-7   NJAC    Montclair State
A   008   0.714   0.561   0.483   0.535   0.5796   062   A          10-4    10-4   SKY     SUNY-Old Westbury

MA   01   0.857   0.663   0.529   0.618   0.6779   002   A   C     12-2    13-2   MACC    Albright
MA   02   0.833   0.614   0.547   0.592   0.6522   005   C   002    10-2     ---   MACC    Alvernia
MA   03   0.727   0.656   0.547   0.620   0.6467   007   C   003     8-3     9-5   MACC    Messiah
MA   04   0.846   0.532   0.536   0.534   0.6119   023   A   C     11-2    13-2   CAC     St. Marys (Md.)
MA   05   0.846   0.529   0.534   0.530   0.6093   024   C   012    11-2    13-2   MACC    Lycoming
MA   06   0.733   0.586   0.526   0.566   0.6078   025   C   013    11-4    11-4   MACC    Elizabethtown
MA   07   0.615   0.647   0.494   0.596   0.6008   028   A   C      8-5    10-6   LAND    Susquehanna
MA   08   0.786   0.548   0.517   0.538   0.5997   033   C   018    11-3    13-3   CAC     York (Pa.)

S   001   1.000   0.569   0.515   0.551   0.6632   004   A   C     10-0    13-1   ODAC    Eastern Mennonite
S   002   0.857   0.549   0.524   0.541   0.6200   018   C   007    12-2    14-2   ODAC    Virginia Wesleyan
S   003   0.938   0.500   0.538   0.513   0.6189   019   C   008    15-1    15-1   ODAC    Guilford
S   004   0.889   0.505   0.531   0.514   0.6077   026   C   014     8-1    14-1   ODAC    Randolph-Macon
S   005   0.818   0.529   0.512   0.524   0.5973   036   B   001     9-2    14-2   GSAC    Maryville (Tenn.)
S   006   0.733   0.577   0.493   0.549   0.5952   038   A   C-2    11-4    11-4   SCAC    Austin
S   007   0.818   0.512   0.501   0.508   0.5856   052   N/A         9-2    13-2   SCAC    Birmingham-Southern
S   008   0.857   0.476   0.522   0.491   0.5828   057   A          12-2    13-3   ASC     Texas-Dallas
S   009   0.714   0.553   0.493   0.533   0.5782   064   C   032    10-4    10-5   ASC     Mary Hardin-Baylor
S   010   0.692   0.531   0.518   0.527   0.5682   078   C   044     9-4    10-4   UAA     Emory
S   011   0.786   0.467   0.514   0.482   0.5582   090   C   054    11-3    12-4   SCAC    Southwestern

GL   01   0.833   0.543   0.506   0.531   0.6065   027   A   C      5-1     9-6   MIAA    Calvin
GL   02   0.786   0.531   0.524   0.528   0.5928   042   A   C-2    11-3    12-4   OAC     Wilmington
GL   03   0.833   0.496   0.492   0.495   0.5793   063   C   031    10-2    10-4   AMCC    Penn State-Behrend
GL   04   0.643   0.571   0.496   0.546   0.5703   072   C   040     9-5    10-5   OAC     John Carroll
GL   05   0.786   0.478   0.536   0.497   0.5693   073   A          11-3    11-4   NCAC    Wooster
GL   06   0.727   0.493   0.553   0.513   0.5664   082   C   047     8-3    10-5   OAC     Heidelberg
GL   07   0.778   0.484   0.501   0.490   0.5618   087   C   052     7-2    10-5   MIAA    Albion
GL   08   0.750   0.490   0.485   0.488   0.5536   103   A          12-4    12-4   PrAC    Thomas Moore
GL   09   0.818   0.446   0.501   0.464   0.5528   106   C   066     9-2    13-2   NCAC    Wittenberg

MW   01   0.818   0.628   0.535   0.597   0.6522   006   A   C      9-2    12-2   UAA     Washington U.
MW   02   0.778   0.623   0.560   0.602   0.6458   008   A   C      7-2    11-4   CCIW    Carthage
MW   03   0.857   0.573   0.534   0.560   0.6344   013   C   005    12-2    13-2   CCIW    Illinois Wesleyan
MW   04   0.800   0.518   0.502   0.513   0.5845   055   A          12-3    13-3   HCAC    Defiance
MW   05   0.917   0.410   0.540   0.453   0.5691   074   A          11-1    12-1   MWC     St. Norbert
MW   06   0.929   0.424   0.498   0.448   0.5684   077   C   043    13-1    15-1   HCAC    Anderson
MW   07   0.643   0.531   0.554   0.539   0.5647   084   C   049     9-5    10-5   CCIW    Wheaton (Ill.)
MW   08   0.909   0.410   0.513   0.444   0.5602   089   A          10-1    11-4   SLIAC    Westminster (Mo.)
MW   09   0.643   0.509   0.555   0.525   0.5541   099   C   060     9-5     9-6   CCIW    Augustana
MW   10   0.533   0.595   0.492   0.561   0.5539   102   C   063     8-7     9-7   HCAC    Transylvania
MW   11   0.727   0.482   0.522   0.495   0.5534   104   C   064     8-3     9-3   MWC     Ripon

W   001   0.933   0.620   0.566   0.602   0.6848   001   A   C     14-1    15-1   WIAC    UW-Stevens Point
W   002   0.875   0.616   0.554   0.595   0.6652   003   C   001    14-2    14-2   WIAC    UW-Whitewater
W   003   0.786   0.607   0.567   0.594   0.6417   009   C   004    11-3    12-4   WIAC    UW-La Crosse
W   004   0.833   0.588   0.538   0.572   0.6370   011   A   C     10-2    13-2   MIAC    St. Thomas
W   005   0.857   0.542   0.562   0.549   0.6258   016   A   C     12-2    14-2   NWC     Whitworth
W   006   0.846   0.544   0.536   0.541   0.6173   020   C   009    11-2    11-4   MIAC    Gustavus Adolphus
W   007   0.667   0.587   0.562   0.579   0.6007   029   C   015     8-4    10-6   WIAC    UW-Platteville
W   008   0.769   0.549   0.531   0.543   0.5998   032   C   017    10-3    10-3   MIAC    Augsburg
W   009   0.846   0.521   0.502   0.514   0.5974   035   A   C     11-2    12-4   IIAC    Cornell
W   010   0.615   0.594   0.536   0.574   0.5847   054   C   029     8-5     9-6   MIAC    St. Johns
W   011   0.923   0.453   0.495   0.467   0.5811   058   B   002    12-1    14-2   IND     Chapman
W   012   1.000   0.362   0.581   0.435   0.5761   067   C   035     6-0     8-6   NWC     Linfield

      Pool:   A   Top ranked team in Pool A eligible conference
         B   Pool B eligible team
         C   At large candidate
         N/A   Not eligible for postseason participation

      B or C #      Rank in Pool (C or B)

      A Status:   C   Pool A candidate, would rank within top 19 of Pool C
         C-2   2nd tier Pool A candidate, would rank 20-29 of Pool C
         Blank   Ranks outside of the top 29 of Pool C

      Updated:   1/20/2010

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh · January 20, 2010, 11:54:29 AM

Thank you so much! +k