Pool C

Started by Pat Coleman, January 20, 2006, 02:35:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pat Coleman

There's no requirement they have to take one from each region, no.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Matt Letourneau

Would you consider it likely though, or have entire regions been shut out of Pool C in the past?

Ralph Turner

Yes, there were only 7 Pool C bids in 2005.  There are 8 regions.

Matt Letourneau

Well, hell, I should stop asking obvious questions then.  I wasn't paying attention last year cause Catholic had no prayer, and the year before that they won the tourney so it didn't matter, and before that I used to pay attention but that's too long to remember!

Pat Coleman

Check out the FAQ to catch up.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

diehardfan

Quote from: Ralph Turner on February 23, 2006, 12:31:05 AM
Yes, there were only 7 Pool C bids in 2005.  There are 8 regions.

and the Northeast tended to get a few.  :-\ Though the year Amherst and Williams were in the final four they definitely desered it!
Wait, dunks are only worth two points?!?!!!? Why does anyone do them? - diehardfan
What are Parkers now supposed to chant after every NP vs WC game, "Let's go enjoy tobacco products off-campus? - Gregory Sager
We all read it, but we don't take anything you say seriously - Luke Kasten


RIP WheatonC

Gregory Sager

Quote from: Pat Coleman on February 22, 2006, 11:09:23 AMAs for NESCAC and Pool C, man, you guys are assuming a lot in terms of the NESCAC presidents' motivation here. Don't forget, folks, the NESCAC has had this schedule since LOOOOOONG before QOWI and the uber-emphasis on regionality came into play.

I can't help it. All of that free-floating paranoia in the MWC room regarding Lawrence and the #1 ranking was apparently contagious.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
"To see what is in front of one's nose is a constant struggle." -- George Orwell

Greek Tragedy

Quote from: diehardfan on February 23, 2006, 01:01:42 AM
and the Northeast tended to get a few.  :-\ Though the year Amherst and Williams were in the final four they definitely desered it!

I thought Williams was alright until we spanked them in the championship game! lol.  I'M KIDDING!  ;D  That game was amazing and the semi that featured Williams and Amherst was pretty awesome as well.  Tucker Kain was giving me alcers!  Both definitely deserved to be there, though I wish the NCAA would make more exceptions like they did for those two teams by purposely putting them in different brackets.
Pointers
Breed of a Champion
2004, 2005, 2010 and 2015 National Champions

Fantasy Leagues Commissioner

TGHIJGSTO!!!

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)


Albright (#8 in the Mid-Atlantic) lost to Messiah (unranked) last night.  Since Albright was also not among the top 50 in QOWI, I think this probably drops them from contention.  With Widener barely able to get by Elizabethtown, the question becomes: Does Widener get in if they lose to Messiah for the AQ?
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

Ralph Turner

Quote from: Hoops Fan on February 23, 2006, 09:35:18 AM

Albright (#8 in the Mid-Atlantic) lost to Messiah (unranked) last night.  Since Albright was also not among the top 50 in QOWI, I think this probably drops them from contention.  With Widener barely able to get by Elizabethtown, the question becomes: Does Widener get in if they lose to Messiah for the AQ?

I think that we need to look at the number of Tourney Upsets, come Sunday afternoon.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)


Well yes, of course, but we're trying to speculate wildly here, Ralph; stop ruining the fun.
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

Knightstalker

Quote from: Gregory Sager on February 23, 2006, 05:26:38 AM
Quote from: Pat Coleman on February 22, 2006, 11:09:23 AMAs for NESCAC and Pool C, man, you guys are assuming a lot in terms of the NESCAC presidents' motivation here. Don't forget, folks, the NESCAC has had this schedule since LOOOOOONG before QOWI and the uber-emphasis on regionality came into play.

I can't help it. All of that free-floating paranoia in the MWC room regarding Lawrence and the #1 ranking was apparently contagious.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

It's ok Greg, I see those NESCAC presidents sneaking around on my grassy knoll all the time.  They are up to something.

"In the end we will survive rather than perish not because we accumulate comfort and luxury but because we accumulate wisdom"  Colonel Jack Jacobs US Army (Ret).

devossed

Quote from: Hoops Fan on February 23, 2006, 09:49:36 AM

Well yes, of course, but we're trying to speculate wildly here, Ralph; stop ruining the fun.

Well, consider the source...

Knightstalker

I took Ralphs two lists and compared the teams that were not on both.  On some I think Ralph just missed crossing them out on both lists.  Some appeared in the regional rankings but not in the top 50 QOWI.
On the Regional not on QOWI

4 Wittenberg 17-3 22-3  NCAC
6 Catholic 16-5 18-6  CAC
8 Albright 14-7 16-8  MACC
8 Rhode Island College 16-8 16-8  LEC
10 Williams 16-8 17-8
7 Howard Payne 17-6 18-6  ASC-West
8 Mary Hardin-Baylor 17-6 17-8  ASC-West
8 St. Thomas 18-5 20-5  MIAC

On QOWI not on Regional
Wooster    10.333    19-2  NCAC
UW-Stout    10.000    16-4 WIAC
Baldwin-Wallace    10.000    19-4  OAC
New Jersey    9.905    14-7  NJAC
SUNY-Farmingdale    9.667    16-5  SUNYAC

"In the end we will survive rather than perish not because we accumulate comfort and luxury but because we accumulate wisdom"  Colonel Jack Jacobs US Army (Ret).

Knightstalker

#434
Next I took the teams that appeared on both lists.  These are the regionally ranked teams that appear in the top 50 QOWI who are not leading their conference.  Each team is listed twice, the first line is the regional rank and the second line is the QOWI rank.  These are the schools I would assume are the front runners for the Pool C bids at this time, this will change after all the conference tournaments end.

There are 16 teams here

3 New Jersey City 16-7 17-8  NJAC
44 New Jersey City    9.739    16-7  NJAC

5 Richard Stockton 15-7 17-8  NJAC
42 Richard Stockton    9.783    15-8  NJAC

3 New York University 17-6 18-6  UAA
47 New York University    9.696    17-6  UAA

4 Utica 18-5 19-5  E8
49 Utica    9.652    18-5  E8

3 Hope 15-2 23-2  MIAA
38 Hope    9.875    14-2  MIAA

4 Carroll 18-3 20-3  MWC
25 Carroll    10.095    18-3  MWC

5 Illinois Wesleyan 14-5 19-5  CCIW
27 Illinois Wesleyan    10.053    14-5 CCIW

6 North Central 14-5 20-5  CCIW
37 North Central    9.895    14-5  CCIW

7 Washington U. 14-5 17-7  UAA
24 Washington U.    10.111    13-5  UAA

3 Tufts 19-4 19-5  NESCAC
7 Tufts    10.826    19-4  NESCAC

5 Trinity (Conn.) 15-4 18-5  NESCAC
33 Trinity (Conn.)    10.000    15-4  NESCAC

6 Bates 15-5 19-5  NESCAC
28 Bates    10.048    16-5  NESCAC

4 Randolph-Macon 19-5 22-5   ODAC
23 Randolph-Macon    10.125    19-5  ODAC

4 Occidental 11-3 18-4  SCIAC
26 Occidental    10.071    11-3  SCIAC CMS has the Pool A.

5 UW-Whitewater 15-5 19-5  WIAC
35 UW-Whitewater    9.950    15-5  WIAC

6 UW-La Crosse 17-6 19-6  WIAC
39 UW-La Crosse    9.870    17-6  WIAC18-5  CC

I don't expect all of these teams to make it, I think NJCU has a snowballs chance in hell, but at least they still have that slim chance, more likely they will be one of three or four NJAC teams in the eight team ECAC metro tournament.

"In the end we will survive rather than perish not because we accumulate comfort and luxury but because we accumulate wisdom"  Colonel Jack Jacobs US Army (Ret).