FB: Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:19:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

OzJohnnie

I'm speechless as well.  Put it down to Vikings rage and typing on a blackberry?
  

badgerwarhawk

Quote from: sjusection105 on October 27, 2010, 08:40:22 PM

Will Chili be joining Brewster on the unemployment line? There will be an opening in Dallas by the end of the year, perhaps Big D is the next stop for each of them?

Childress just got a contract extension in November. 

I couldn't stand him when he was a BADGER assistant.

It will be interesting to see what developes if Favre wants to play and Childress says they're going with TJ.

And, last but not least, you are correct the Vikings do SUCK.  ;)

"Strange days have found us.  Strange days have tracked us down." .... J. Morrison

USTBench

Quote from: sjusection105 on October 27, 2010, 08:40:22 PM
Quote from: OzJohnnie on October 27, 2010, 08:37:32 PM
In the sprirte of 105's karmalizing action, how about a topic that can bring all of us together on this divisive board in this particularly partisan time of the year in America?

Just how much do the Vikings suck?  Can it be measured with 64 bit integers?  And how many ways can Childress be justly tortured in punishment for his sins of utter incompetence?

Will Chili be joining Brewster on the unemployment line? There will be an opening in Dallas by the end of the year, perhaps Big D is the next stop for each of them?

It's hard to watch people in no fail situations, fail (See Wade Phillips, Brad Childress). This may be crazy, but I sometimes feel NFL teams are overcoached. Machinating themselves into mistakes. If you have a team full of single digit Wunderlic scores it might be impractical to have them making sight adjustments all day. No disrespect to Packers wide outs but how many times did they run the wrong route because they didn't know defensive scheme?
Augsburg University: 2021 MIAC Spring Football Champions

DoubleO

Quote from: OzJohnnie on October 27, 2010, 08:37:32 PM
In the spirit of 105's karmalizing action, how about a topic that can bring all of us together on this divisive board in this particularly partisan time of the year in America?

Just how much do the Vikings suck?  Can it be represented with only 64 bit integers?  And how many ways can Childress be justly tortured in punishment for his sins of utter incompetence?

The Queens do suck, but not nearly as bad as my Bears! It's painful how horrendous they are.

cobbernation

Quote from: DoubleO on October 28, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Quote from: OzJohnnie on October 27, 2010, 08:37:32 PM
In the spirit of 105's karmalizing action, how about a topic that can bring all of us together on this divisive board in this particularly partisan time of the year in America?

Just how much do the Vikings suck?  Can it be represented with only 64 bit integers?  And how many ways can Childress be justly tortured in punishment for his sins of utter incompetence?


The Queens do suck, but not nearly as bad as my Bears! It's painful how horrendous they are.

The bears are bad.  How I would hate to have the vikings be 4-3 and leading the NFC North at this point of the season.

BDB

Quote from: OzJohnnie on October 27, 2010, 08:37:32 PM
Just how much do the Vikings suck?  Can it be represented with only 64 bit integers? 

64 bit integers? What the....stop making me feel stupid!  ;)

I'm more like the guy in the movie when asked if he was re-wiring his electrical to "all 220" and he replied "220, 221. Whatever it takes."

Freebird

First look at the regional rankings.....

East Regiopn
1.   Montclair State   7-0   7-0
2.   Delaware Valley   6-0   6-1
3.   Rowan   6-1   6-1
4.   Alfred   5-1   6-1
5.   St. John Fisher   7-1   7-1
6.   SUNY-Maritime   8-0   8-0
7.   Cortland State   6-1   6-1
8.   Norwich   7-1   7-1
9.   Western New England   7-1   7-1
10.   Maine Maritime   6-1   6-1

North Region
1.   Wheaton (Ill.)   7-0   7-0
2.   North Central (Ill.)   7-0   7-0
3.   Mount Union   6-0   7-0
4.   Ohio Northern   5-1   6-1
5.   Case Western Reserve   6-0   7-0
6.   Trine   6-0   7-0
7.   Baldwin-Wallace   6-1   6-1
8.   Franklin   5-1   6-1
9.   Wittenberg   6-0   8-0
10.   Wabash   6-0   6-1

South Region
1.   Hampden-Sydney   7-0   7-0
2.   Mary Hardin-Baylor   6-0   7-0
3.   Wesley   4-0   7-0
4.   DePauw 7-0   7-0
5.   Thomas More   7-0   7-0
6.   Ursinus   7-0   7-0
7.   Salisbury   4-1   6-1
8.   Hardin-Simmons   7-1   7-1
9.   Randolph-Macon   7-1   7-1
10.   Washington and Jefferson   5-2   5-2

West Region
1.   St. Thomas 8-0   8-0
2.   UW-Whitewater   4-0   7-0
3.   Wartburg   7-0   7-0
4.   Coe   4-1   6-1
5.   Bethel   6-1   6-1
6.   Cal Lutheran   5-1   5-1
7.   Redlands   5-1   5-1
8.   Linfield   5-1   5-1
9.   Pacific Lutheran   4-1   5-1
10.   Central 7-1   7-1


sjusection105

Quote from: badgerwarhawk on October 28, 2010, 09:34:28 AM

I couldn't stand him when he was a BADGER assistant.


Was that when Bevell was the QB- Rose Bowl year?
As of now they're on DOUBLE SECRET Probation!

hazzben

The East is just so weak.

Very interesting to see how things settle out in the CCIW. Wheaton has two tough games left with Auggie and NCC. If NCC loses, they have a really poor SOS and might not garner an at large. But if NCC wins out, they aren't out of conversation for getting a #1 seed with Mount moved east.

Obviously, I'd like to see Mount 'east' and UWW 'north' and Bethel winning out and getting an at large.

SCIAC and NWC are interesting as well. Just with the travel situation in the first round. What happens if PLU wins out?? Do they actually give us an odd number of West coast teams in the field?? Have to think the committee is cheering for Willamette to let them off the hook.

UST is sitting pretty. Take care of business and they should at least see a 2 seed, maybe even a #1.

DoubleO

Quote from: cobbernation on October 28, 2010, 10:30:10 AM
Quote from: DoubleO on October 28, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Quote from: OzJohnnie on October 27, 2010, 08:37:32 PM
In the spirit of 105's karmalizing action, how about a topic that can bring all of us together on this divisive board in this particularly partisan time of the year in America?

Just how much do the Vikings suck?  Can it be represented with only 64 bit integers?  And how many ways can Childress be justly tortured in punishment for his sins of utter incompetence?


The Queens do suck, but not nearly as bad as my Bears! It's painful how horrendous they are.

The bears are bad.  How I would hate to have the vikings be 4-3 and leading the NFC North at this point of the season.


Don't be fooled by their record. They may not win another game this season.

DoubleO

Quote from: hazzben on October 28, 2010, 11:57:52 AM
The East is just so weak.

Very interesting to see how things settle out in the CCIW. Wheaton has two tough games left with Auggie and NCC. If NCC loses, they have a really poor SOS and might not garner an at large. But if NCC wins out, they aren't out of conversation for getting a #1 seed with Mount moved east.

Obviously, I'd like to see Mount 'east' and UWW 'north' and Bethel winning out and getting an at large.

SCIAC and NWC are interesting as well. Just with the travel situation in the first round. What happens if PLU wins out?? Do they actually give us an odd number of West coast teams in the field?? Have to think the committee is cheering for Willamette to let them off the hook.

UST is sitting pretty. Take care of business and they should at least see a 2 seed, maybe even a #1.

There is no way UST takes a #1 seed if both they and Whitewater finish undefeated, is there?

DuffMan

Quote from: DoubleO on October 28, 2010, 02:20:52 PM
There is no way UST takes a #1 seed if both they and Whitewater finish undefeated, is there?

The NCAA doesn't "seed" teams, right, Pat?   ;)

I don't see them putting UST over UWW if both teams are undefeated.

A tradition unrivaled...
MIAC Champions: '32, '35, '36, '38, '53, '62, '63, '65, '71, '74, '75, '76, '77, '79, '82, '85, '89, '91, '93, '94, '95, '96, '98, '99, '01, '02, '03, '05, '06, '08, '09, '14, '18, '19, '21, '22, '24
National Champions: '63, '65, '76, '03

hazzben

Quote from: DuffMan on October 28, 2010, 02:26:13 PM
Quote from: DoubleO on October 28, 2010, 02:20:52 PM
There is no way UST takes a #1 seed if both they and Whitewater finish undefeated, is there?

The NCAA doesn't "seed" teams, right, Pat?   ;)

I don't see them putting UST over UWW if both teams are undefeated.

No, UST isn't a #1 over UWW if they're in the same region. But there is a very real possibility, given the weak nature of the 'east' that Mount could get moved. It would then become a question of who is more worthy of having a bracket built around them, an undefeated North Central or UST. (I'm assuming the committee would already have viewed an unbeaten UWW as worthy)

If NCC loses or the committee feels UST has a stronger resume between the two unbeatens, they could move UWW 'north' and build the 'west' around UST.

All that to say, there is a lot of football left, especially over the next few weeks in the CCIW.

D O.C.

#53383
Just trying to get a head count for red cups...

TDT, supposing LINFIELD just lucks out and has to go to St. Paul to lay down for that brute running back, which side of the field would you sit on?

Anyone else?

DuffMan


A tradition unrivaled...
MIAC Champions: '32, '35, '36, '38, '53, '62, '63, '65, '71, '74, '75, '76, '77, '79, '82, '85, '89, '91, '93, '94, '95, '96, '98, '99, '01, '02, '03, '05, '06, '08, '09, '14, '18, '19, '21, '22, '24
National Champions: '63, '65, '76, '03