FB: Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

[PurpleTide]

A bloke walks into a brothel and says, "I'm a bit kinky, how much for total humiliation?"

The madam replies "$100".

"wow, ok, what do I get for that?" the man asks.

"A Tommie hat and t-shirt."

I heard that Fasching was only dressing twenty-two players against UST.
– He said the rest could dress themselves!

[USTBench]

A bloke walks into a brothel and says, "I'm a bit kinky, how much for total humiliation?"

The madam replies "$100".

"wow, ok, what do I get for that?" the man asks.

"A Tommie hat and t-shirt."

I heard that Fasching was only dressing twenty-two players against UST.
– He said the rest could dress themselves!

Strong opening statement. +K

[Mr.MIAC]

A bloke walks into a brothel and says, "I'm a bit kinky, how much for total humiliation?"

The madam replies "$100".

"wow, ok, what do I get for that?" the man asks.

"A Tommie hat and t-shirt."

I heard that Fasching was only dressing twenty-two players against UST.
– He said the rest could dress themselves!

Strong opening statement. +K

Agreed. +K

[Mr.MIAC]

Here's a quick question for those in steerage class. If your mother is your father's sister then she's also your aunt. How should she be presented in public? I'm sure this little conundrum comes up often at the more swanky Collegeville cocktail parties. 

[bennie]

Hitler comparisons...not funny!!
Incest...funny!!!

Good to know how the Tommie mind works!!

[OldAuggie]

Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1"[2][3]—​that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or Nazism.

Promulgated by American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's Law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and blog comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric.[5][6]

Well looks like the Tommie/Johnnie topic has gone on long enough to reach Godwin's law.

[sfury]

Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1"[2][3]—​that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or Nazism.

Promulgated by American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's Law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions.[4] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and blog comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric.[5][6]

Well looks like the Tommie/Johnnie topic has gone on long enough to reach Godwin's law.

Will always remember the 1907 game when some Tommie swells put up pamphlets comparing SJU coach Frank Cassidy to Napoleon.

[OzJohnnie]

Oz's corollary to Goodwin's Law: Goodwin was a slow starter.

(In case it's not obvious because I'm only half, or less, clever than I think, this is all in jest.)

[USTBench]

Hitler comparisons...not funny!!
Incest...funny!!!

Good to know how the Tommie mind works!!

Yeah. Consensual sex between relatives makes me giggle more than the Holocaust.

[OzJohnnie]

Hitler comparisons...not funny!!
Incest...funny!!!

Good to know how the Tommie mind works!!

Yeah. Consensual sex between relatives makes me giggle more than the Holocaust.

I'm smiling at your posts because I know that you at least understand the logic behind the arguments you make.

I do find your admission of mirth re: the Holocaust, albeit less than your insest related chuckles, to be interesting.

[OzJohnnie]

A Tommie dressed as a pirate walks into a bar with a wooden leg, a hook and an eye patch.

The Barman says 'Sheesh - How'd you lose the leg?'

The Tommie says 'Arrrrr - A shark took it off at the knee.'

The Barman says 'Thats no good, what about the hand?'

The Tommie says 'Arrrrg - Lost it in a bloody bar brawl.'

The Barman says 'Jeez - Well what about the eye then?'

The Tommie says 'Thats easy.  A seagull crapped in it.'

The Barman says 'What?!?!'

The Tommie says 'Arrrrrrr...I'd only had the hook one day...'

[Pat Coleman]

Oz's corollary to Goodwin's Law: Goodwin was a slow starter.

(In case it's not obvious because I'm only half, or less, clever than I think, this is all in jest.)

Who is Goodwin and how does he relate to Godwin?

[Bombers798891]

I'm not aware of any rules one way or the other. I know that the Cortaca Jug has changed hands in the playoffs.

Incorrect. The 1988 playoff game is not counted in the Cortaca Jug series record

[bennie]

Hitler comparisons...not funny!!
Incest...funny!!!

Good to know how the Tommie mind works!!

Yeah. Consensual sex between relatives makes me giggle more than the Holocaust.

I would argue that neither is particularly amusing and that you are making presumptions about consent....

[USTBench]

Hitler comparisons...not funny!!
Incest...funny!!!

Good to know how the Tommie mind works!!

Yeah. Consensual sex between relatives makes me giggle more than the Holocaust.

I would argue that neither is particularly amusing and that you are making presumptions about consent....

I'm just gonna go ahead a lay off that softball.