FB: Empire 8

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 04:58:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

pg04

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Yes. 2 losses make you a lower seed.  

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Not really, but Rowan hasnt impressed anyone this year yet.  So you cant really say that a lower seed isnt justified....

rowanlb92

Quote from: portgrad2004 on November 07, 2006, 10:37:44 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Yes. 2 losses make you a lower seed.  
Then Curry should be a 1 or 2 seed.!!!

pg04

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:39:03 PM
Quote from: portgrad2004 on November 07, 2006, 10:37:44 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Yes. 2 losses make you a lower seed.  
Then Curry should be a 1 or 2 seed.!!!

Curry has beaten no one..... Strength of Schedule is a big factor, however, Who Rowan lost to in the NJAC will most likely keep them at a low seed.

Tags

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Curry plays in a real weak league ... even though they didn't lose to Montclair State.
I say it's good enough giving Rowan a higher seed over Curry. The rest will have less than 2 losses above Rowan.

Who would you bump down?

rowanlb92

Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2006, 10:38:32 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Not really, but Rowan hasnt impressed anyone this year yet.  So you cant really say that a lower seed isnt justified....

They had a pretty tough road with thier NJAC counterparts.  That  doesn't surprise us.  Also may say that the NJAC was an overall tougher conference this year.  You weren't impressed with the 32-8 thrashing of CNU.

rowanlb92

Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Curry plays in a real weak league ... even though they didn't lose to Montclair State.
I say it's good enough giving Rowan a higher seed over Curry. The rest will have less than 2 losses above Rowan.

Who would you bump down?

I would bump down everyone but Wilks

AUPepBand

Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2006, 10:13:05 PM
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 07, 2006, 10:04:59 PM
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2006, 09:52:59 PM
Also, plus +K to the night crew that was owed last night....

Thanks, Upstate, will return the good will. +K

Still sitting at an 8....maybe got smited and applauded at the same time, a real possibility with me!

Apparently I've applauded you within the past 24 hours....perhaps last night. There was karma flying all over the board last night during our marathon session!

Note: Tried to applaud awhile ago and couldn't do it.....tried again now and Voila! There's your +9.
On Saxon Warriors! On to Victory!
...Fight, fight for Alfred, A-L-F, R-E-D!

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:42:06 PM
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2006, 10:38:32 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Not really, but Rowan hasnt impressed anyone this year yet.  So you cant really say that a lower seed isnt justified....

They had a pretty tough road with thier NJAC counterparts.  That  doesn't surprise us.  Also may say that the NJAC was an overall tougher conference this year.  You weren't impressed with the 32-8 thrashing of CNU.

Dont get me wrong that was a great win, but then they've been so up and down the rest of the season it makes you wonder if it was more a result of one team playing better or worse than they actually are capable of....

Tags

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:43:25 PM
Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Curry plays in a real weak league ... even though they didn't lose to Montclair State.
I say it's good enough giving Rowan a higher seed over Curry. The rest will have less than 2 losses above Rowan.

Who would you bump down?

I would bump down everyone but Wilks

If you're lobbying for a 2 seed you're out of your mind.

Tags

Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2006, 10:45:08 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:42:06 PM
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2006, 10:38:32 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Not really, but Rowan hasnt impressed anyone this year yet.  So you cant really say that a lower seed isnt justified....

They had a pretty tough road with thier NJAC counterparts.  That  doesn't surprise us.  Also may say that the NJAC was an overall tougher conference this year.  You weren't impressed with the 32-8 thrashing of CNU.

Dont get me wrong that was a great win, but then they've been so up and down the rest of the season it makes you wonder if it was more a result of one team playing better or worse than they actually are capable of....

How much does the first game of the year really tell you?

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:43:25 PM
Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Curry plays in a real weak league ... even though they didn't lose to Montclair State.
I say it's good enough giving Rowan a higher seed over Curry. The rest will have less than 2 losses above Rowan.

Who would you bump down?

I would bump down everyone but Wilks

So your saying Rowan is the #2 team in the region?

pg04

Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:45:19 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:43:25 PM
Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Curry plays in a real weak league ... even though they didn't lose to Montclair State.
I say it's good enough giving Rowan a higher seed over Curry. The rest will have less than 2 losses above Rowan.

Who would you bump down?

I would bump down everyone but Wilks

If you're lobbying for a 2 seed you're out of your mind.

It doesn't matter, the committee will not put them there.   

Pat Coleman

Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 08:35:30 PM
Quote from: maxpower on November 07, 2006, 12:42:57 PM
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2006, 12:19:04 AM
Quote from: joseqviper on November 06, 2006, 04:08:29 PM

Not out of the closet, out of probation.  You guys cried to Pat enough to get me suspended from the board.  You sure talk about manlove a lot.  Are you curious?

Nobody sent me a complaint. I just knew it was way way out of line, and considering that we officially take a dim view on posts that do nothing but bash another poster, what did you think we would do when you created a poll in that vein?


Pat, have you SEEN the cortaca board? Or this board the week of IC-Fisher last year? And does the LL board even talk about football?

Also Pat, you should wander over to the LL boards... not much going on over there in the way of football, actually, sports in general...

I am aware.

Cortaca board simply gets deleted next Tuesday. LL board, tell me, are people posting solely to bash other posters? That is not something I have seen. Perhaps it isn't on-topic but someone bolded my words above -- perhaps actually reading them would be helpful.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Tags

Quote from: portgrad2004 on November 07, 2006, 10:46:35 PM
Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:45:19 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:43:25 PM
Quote from: Tags on November 07, 2006, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: rowanlb92 on November 07, 2006, 10:36:48 PM
Does 2 losses make you a lower seed?

With that rationale, shouldn't curry be a 1 seed if they go undefeated?

Curry plays in a real weak league ... even though they didn't lose to Montclair State.
I say it's good enough giving Rowan a higher seed over Curry. The rest will have less than 2 losses above Rowan.

Who would you bump down?

I would bump down everyone but Wilks

If you're lobbying for a 2 seed you're out of your mind.

It doesn't matter, the committee will not put them there.   

Agreed - it's a moot point