FB: Liberty League

[SaintsFAN]

Get ridiculously drunk, with the help of your dad, brother, and even brother-in-law.  Stop at your favorite pizza joint and pick up two large calzones to offset your sisters terrible food.  Shut your self in another room in the house so you can concentrate on the game itself...but come out at half time ripped and make a total a$$ of yourself in front of your sisters "no-watching-the-Super-Bowl" friends.  Hopefully, such an outburst with ensure that you are never invited over there again and never need to watch a Super Bowl uncomfortable for the rest of your life.  I will preference this by advising that you warn Mrs. JT ahead of time.  In the meantime:

- Mom and sister are happy (at least early on) that you stopped over:  Check
- Brother-in-law #2 doesn't think you hate him:  Check
- Get drunk:  Check
- Actually watch the Super Bowl:  Check

Not a perfect solution...but it may help you to make the best of it.  Good luck!!!

SF has a solution... to expand on Yanks thoughts....

INVOLVE BIL#2 in your shenanigans at halftime.  He should probably be begging to go along with you.  Think about it.  He doesn't think you guys like him and he wants to belong...   Its perfect... then later, when they are divorced --- you can blame him totally.  Just make sure you do the planning behind closed doors.  Face to face and don't leave a paper trail (emails).

This could also get you speed up the divorce process, you can put in a bet and probably have a better chance at winning this one also.


For those of you wondering, yes I'm sometimes evil.

[JT]

Get ridiculously drunk, with the help of your dad, brother, and even brother-in-law.  Stop at your favorite pizza joint and pick up two large calzones to offset your sisters terrible food.  Shut your self in another room in the house so you can concentrate on the game itself...but come out at half time ripped and make a total a$$ of yourself in front of your sisters "no-watching-the-Super-Bowl" friends.  Hopefully, such an outburst with ensure that you are never invited over there again and never need to watch a Super Bowl uncomfortable for the rest of your life.  I will preference this by advising that you warn Mrs. JT ahead of time.  In the meantime:

- Mom and sister are happy (at least early on) that you stopped over:  Check
- Brother-in-law #2 doesn't think you hate him:  Check
- Get drunk:  Check
- Actually watch the Super Bowl:  Check

Not a perfect solution...but it may help you to make the best of it.  Good luck!!!

SF has a solution... to expand on Yanks thoughts....

INVOLVE BIL#2 in your shenanigans at halftime.  He should probably be begging to go along with you.  Think about it.  He doesn't think you guys like him and he wants to belong...   Its perfect... then later, when they are divorced --- you can blame him totally.  Just make sure you do the planning behind closed doors.  Face to face and don't leave a paper trail (emails).

This could also get you speed up the divorce process, you can put in a bet and probably have a better chance at winning this one also.


For those of you wondering, yes I'm sometimes evil.

JT hasn't determined if sister is thinking upgrade. Dood could be looking at a judgeship. so sister could be getting and upgrade on hubby #2 from hubby #2.  Being his Mrs. Judge and all social implications might just fit the bill.

JT thinks his sister thinks of men like houses... hubby #1 was the starter home, and he was happy being a starter home.

[Garnet]

Good news for Jets fans!

Word out of Washington is that President Obama is going to Indiana to drum up support for the Colts.

[PBR...]

somebody stop the madness...

     HUNTINGTON BEACH, Calif.,  Jan. 20 (UPI) -- Drinking games
like "beer pong" have been outlawed for new establishments in
Huntington Beach, Calif., officials say.
     The coastal suburb's City Council voted Tuesday to ban the
drinking games at new restaurants, expanding a ban already in
place for existing establishments, in a bid to clean up the
city's downtown nightlife, The Orange County (Calif.) Register
reported.
     In beer pong, contestants try to bounce ping-pong balls
into beer cups arrayed on a table, with opposing team members
having to drink the cup that the ball falls into, the newspaper
said.
     "We need to create an environment that works," Huntington
Beach Councilman Don Hansen said. "We're looking for that right
eclectic mix."
     The move comes after the town was featured on television
as a site for the "beer pong world championships" in 2008 and
as other cities are also cracking down on the drinking game. A
2008 Time Magazine article noted that Belmar, N.J., outlawed
outdoor beer pong after complaining the game prompted "foul language, rowdy and disorderly behavior and to examples of the
consumption of alcohol under circumstances that are
detrimental."

[PBR...]

United States citizens.....Your Welcome.

Signed,
~ The Residents on MA

PS - For once, folks in MA didn't act like zombies and walk into the booths to vote (D) regardless of the topics.

a great op-ed piece on what is so wrong w/ our country and actually getting anything done in d.c.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a4y2POFLXqKA

[SJFF82]

Dear JT:

Thank you for calling me out in front of the world (D3 that is).  I am sorry you dont like my cooking or my parties.  That's ok because I dont like your politics.  Dont worry about appeasing Hubby #2 because he doesnt like you either.  

When you do come for the party, I will make sure that I have a separate room just for you with your own tv and your own food and drink.  I hope you choke on it....on second thought I hope Obama gets re-elected in 2012 and you choke on that.

/s/

JT's sister

[JT]

Dear JT:

Thank you for calling me out in front of the world (D3 that is).  I am sorry you dont like my cooking or my parties.  That's ok because I dont like your politics.  Dont worry about appeasing Hubby #2 because he doesnt like you either.  

When you do come for the party, I will make sure that I have a separate room just for you with your own tv and your own food and drink.  I hope you choke on it....on second thought I hope Obama gets re-elected in 2012 and you choke on that.

/s/

JT's sister

You had me going until the Obama re-elected part.  She is conservative just like JT.  Hubby #2 likes JT.  He wants to hang out all the time.  Work schedules and not living in proximity to each other prevent it.

+k

It will all work out.  JT can make this work.  

[JT]

United States citizens.....Your Welcome.

Signed,
~ The Residents on MA

PS - For once, folks in MA didn't act like zombies and walk into the booths to vote (D) regardless of the topics.

a great op-ed piece on what is so wrong w/ our country and actually getting anything done in d.c.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a4y2POFLXqKA

Democrats love the filibuster when they are in the minority.  Now they want to get rid of it.  When they are back in the minority, they'll want it back.  JT's advice... no Democrat only backroom deals, no excluding Republicans from debate, no blocking Republican alternatives from seeing the light of day.  In other words, Democrats will just have deal with it.  They need to be taught a lesson.  A bigger lesson is coming in November.

I agree with ending lifetime appointments to the bench.  I also would like to see term limits.  12 yrs and out.  But you can go from House to Senate for a 24 yr total maximum.  I'd also cut the Senate term from 6 yrs to 4 yrs. The founders never intended for these dopes to become life long politicians.

[SJFF82]

United States citizens.....Your Welcome.

Signed,
~ The Residents on MA

PS - For once, folks in MA didn't act like zombies and walk into the booths to vote (D) regardless of the topics.

a great op-ed piece on what is so wrong w/ our country and actually getting anything done in d.c.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a4y2POFLXqKA

Democrats love the filibuster when they are in the minority.  Now they want to get rid of it.  When they are back in the minority, they'll want it back.  JT's advice... no Democrat only backroom deals, no excluding Republicans from debate, no blocking Republican alternatives from seeing the light of day.  In other words, Democrats will just have deal with it.  They need to be taught a lesson.  A bigger lesson is coming in November.

Not sure if Schumer (NY-D) is up in 2010....but hopefully he is next to go.  That arrogant elitist needs to be taught a lesson for sure.

[SJFF82]

United States citizens.....Your Welcome.

Signed,
~ The Residents on MA

PS - For once, folks in MA didn't act like zombies and walk into the booths to vote (D) regardless of the topics.

a great op-ed piece on what is so wrong w/ our country and actually getting anything done in d.c.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a4y2POFLXqKA

Democrats love the filibuster when they are in the minority.  Now they want to get rid of it.  When they are back in the minority, they'll want it back.  JT's advice... no Democrat only backroom deals, no excluding Republicans from debate, no blocking Republican alternatives from seeing the light of day.  In other words, Democrats will just have deal with it.  They need to be taught a lesson.  A bigger lesson is coming in November.

I agree with ending lifetime appointments to the bench.  I also would like to see term limits.  12 yrs and out.  But you can go from House to Senate for a 24 yr total maximum.  I'd also cut the Senate term from 6 yrs to 4 yrs. The founders never intended for these dopes to become life long politicians.

Just to play devil's advocate...the Founders never could have anticipated that the lawmakers would pass legislation that allowed for our borders to be flood gates for those future welfare recipients who of course vote Democrat in November allowing for the dopes to remain in office infinitum.


....nevermind our own general population on welfare and growing that votes Democrat...

[union89]

Maybe he was bummed out because the 'Bizzaroneers' did not win a conference game last year:

http://www.telegram.com/article/20100120/NEWS/100129966/1116

[dlippiel]

United States citizens.....Your Welcome.

Signed,
~ The Residents on MA

PS - For once, folks in MA didn't act like zombies and walk into the booths to vote (D) regardless of the topics.

a great op-ed piece on what is so wrong w/ our country and actually getting anything done in d.c.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a4y2POFLXqKA

Democrats love the filibuster when they are in the minority.  Now they want to get rid of it.  When they are back in the minority, they'll want it back.  JT's advice... no Democrat only backroom deals, no excluding Republicans from debate, no blocking Republican alternatives from seeing the light of day.  In other words, Democrats will just have deal with it.  They need to be taught a lesson.  A bigger lesson is coming in November.

I agree with ending lifetime appointments to the bench.  I also would like to see term limits.  12 yrs and out.  But you can go from House to Senate for a 24 yr total maximum.  I'd also cut the Senate term from 6 yrs to 4 yrs. The founders never intended for these dopes to become life long politicians.

Democrats = ****ing assholes

Republicans = ****ing assholes

Politics = take it to the ****ing political boards please

[Kira & Jaxon's Dad]

(Got this in an email today)

THE JOB - URINE TEST
(Whoever wrote this one deserves a HUGE pat on the back!)

Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their --- doing drugs, while I work. . . .

Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? I guess we could title that program, 'Urine or You're Out'. Just a thought.

Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.

Hope you all will pass it along, though ... Something has to change in this country -- and soon !!!!!!!

[Kira & Jaxon's Dad]

Today's TOTD isn't bad.  Little brown eye winking out...

[dlippiel]

(Got this in an email today)

THE JOB - URINE TEST
(Whoever wrote this one deserves a HUGE pat on the back!)

Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their --- doing drugs, while I work. . . .

Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check? I guess we could title that program, 'Urine or You're Out'. Just a thought.

Pass this along if you agree or simply delete if you don't.

Hope you all will pass it along, though ... Something has to change in this country -- and soon !!!!!!!

+k kd best mother****ing post on the LLPP today, a ****ing breath of fresh air!