Great Lakes Region

Started by sac, February 21, 2007, 06:46:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KnightSlappy

Quote from: sac on February 27, 2012, 04:51:51 PM
This list clearly demonstrates the importance of the regional system.   ??? ::)

I always feel like this shows that the NCAA is talking out of both sides of their mouth.

NCAA: Calvin and Hope: NATHCON, CCIW, WIAC, MWC are out of region for you. Stop scheduling them during the season.

NCAA: Calvin and Hope: NATHCON, CCIW, WIAC, MWC fits best for you 'geographically', so we'll nearly always put you with them come tournament time.

sac

Our Great Lakes region friends from Bethany bowed out of the tournament to St. Mary's, MD last night.  Looks like it got away from them early and they just never really recovered.   http://www.bethanywv.edu/statfiles/MBB11/betsmcm1.htm

Seeing Nick Wilcox held to 3 points is kind of amazing to me.  He looked to be a very solid, challenging player to defend when Bethany came up here to play Olivet in December.

I'd say the boxscore points out their lack of depth but I think each of their boxscores has looked like that one.  British Alexander with an iron man 40 minutes.

Looking at the brackets I thought maybe Bethany should have been hosting this game, seeing how it played out I doubt it would have made too much of a difference.

smedindy

With British Alexander and Brady Pacific, they certainly have contenders for the tournament All-Name team!
Wabash Always Fights!

kiltedbryan

Disappointing result from Cabrini:

Ohio Wesleyan 60
Hobart 64


Great Lakes region teams start the tourney 0-2.   :(

KnightSlappy

We're still nearly a month away from the first set of Regional Rankings, but it's fun to hypothesize anyway. My crack at the "current" rankings along with regional record and results vs. possibly ranked teams.

1. Ohio Wesleyan (13-0, Capital, Wittenberg) -- no other option right now.

2. Wooster (12-2, Wittenberg, L-Adrian, L-Transylvania) -- They're "helped" if Adrian doesn't make the rankings at any point this year.

3. Calvin (9-0, Adrian) -- Calvin could be considered starting at #2 - the common opponent of Adrian helps them over Wooster - but their in-region weighted SOS is terrible right now. One could even justify dropping them further. Calvin is similarly hurt if Adrian doesn't crack the rankings to become at least "one ranked, always ranked".

4. Wittenberg (8-3, Capital, L-Wooster, L-Ohio Wesleyan) -- I would otherwise put Capital here (though it's close), but the head-to-head would likely give the advantage to Wittenberg.

5. Capital (11-2, L-Wittenberg, L-Ohio Wesleyan) -- The head-to-head and sketchy SOS number is enough to slide Capital below Wittenberg.

6. Thomas More (12-2, L-Transylvania) -- Could argue for Thomas More starting at #4, but they don't have a tough schedule and haven't beaten anyone noteworthy. Their head-to-head win over St. Vincent on Saturday puts them here instead of St. Vincent.

On the outside

Adrian (7-3, Wooster, L-Calvin) -- They'd have been as high as third a week ago, but a 1-3 start to conference play won't help. They'll need a strong showing from here on out - including perhaps a win over Calvin - to climb back in the race. Their SOS number still looks good.

Hope (6-3, Adrian, L-Wheaton (IL), L-North Central) -- Despite the 6-3 record, Hope is still very much alive in the region. They'll need a good MIAA showing (4-0 so far) and probably a win or two over Calvin, but they could very well be in the hunt at some point. Their schedule to date has been quite tough.

St. Vincent (9-3, L-Thomas More) -- St. Vincent was a borderline candidate anyway, but their head-to-head loss versus Thomas More will keep them down for a while.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

February 6th will be the first of three public rankings.
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

KnightSlappy

Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on January 14, 2013, 03:36:24 PM
February 6th will be the first of three public rankings.

Has there been a handbook? I haven't stumbled across it yet.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

I have asked and been told it is ready... but I have not found it either (for both men's and women's)... however, I do have a few emails/contacts out to find out where it might be. I will let you know when I learn more.
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

Ralph Turner

Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on January 14, 2013, 03:39:20 PM
I have asked and been told it is ready... but I have not found it either (for both men's and women's)... however, I do have a few emails/contacts out to find out where it might be. I will let you know when I learn more.
Thanks!

sac

#999
All 4 GL region conferences have match-ups with teams at the top of their respective standings this week.


Wednesday

Marietta @ Capital
Hope @ Calvin

Saturday
Wooster @ Ohio Wesleyan
Thomas More @ Bethany   *both in a 3-way tie

Gregory Sager

Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 14, 2013, 02:20:28 PM2. Wooster (12-2, Wittenberg, L-Adrian, L-Transylvania) -- They're "helped" if Adrian doesn't make the rankings at any point this year.

That's not necessarily true. The selection committee looks at both quantity and quality with regard to in-region record versus ranked opponents. If Wooster comes up short on the number of ranked teams it's played -- a problem that's happened to NCAC teams more than once -- that extra game against Adrian could be a boon, even though it was a loss.
"To see what is in front of one's nose is a constant struggle." -- George Orwell

KnightSlappy

Quote from: Gregory Sager on January 14, 2013, 06:58:57 PM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 14, 2013, 02:20:28 PM2. Wooster (12-2, Wittenberg, L-Adrian, L-Transylvania) -- They're "helped" if Adrian doesn't make the rankings at any point this year.

That's not necessarily true. The selection committee looks at both quantity and quality with regard to in-region record versus ranked opponents. If Wooster comes up short on the number of ranked teams it's played -- a problem that's happened to NCAC teams more than once -- that extra game against Adrian could be a boon, even though it was a loss.

Ah, the old double-count the SOS trick!

Gregory Sager

Hey, I'm not saying that I agree with it or that it makes any sense. I just know that this is how the committee operates.
"To see what is in front of one's nose is a constant struggle." -- George Orwell

KnightSlappy

Quote from: Gregory Sager on January 14, 2013, 07:09:53 PM
Hey, I'm not saying that I agree with it or that it makes any sense. I just know that this is how the committee operates.

Oh, I know. They do a lot of boneheaded things.

sac

Quote from: Gregory Sager on January 14, 2013, 06:58:57 PM
Quote from: KnightSlappy on January 14, 2013, 02:20:28 PM2. Wooster (12-2, Wittenberg, L-Adrian, L-Transylvania) -- They're "helped" if Adrian doesn't make the rankings at any point this year.

That's not necessarily true. The selection committee looks at both quantity and quality with regard to in-region record versus ranked opponents. If Wooster comes up short on the number of ranked teams it's played -- a problem that's happened to NCAC teams more than once -- that extra game against Adrian could be a boon, even though it was a loss.

Transylvania might not be ranked either but I haven't really looked at the Midwest.  Before the next ranking they play Rose-Hulman again.