East Region Fan Poll

Started by pg04, July 05, 2007, 09:44:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Saxon73

Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
" No matter the differences, brilliance always finds a common ground."  -  Stephen Colbert

superman57

Lew can't agree with you more... Fisher needs to do a lot more than beat Ithaca, to be no 1 in the east... if they also be Alfred... then we might have more of an argument.... but untill then I agree with you
Quote from: Tags on October 10, 2007, 10:59:38 PM
You're the only dood on the board that doesn't know & accept that '57 can't spell.

Poor grammar and horrible spelling... it's just how he rolls.

maxpower

Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.


wtf!!

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.

I hope you meant interlude...

If not I'm totally lost...

union89

Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.

I hope you meant interlude...

If not I'm totally lost...


When you think about it though, repetitive intercourse can be exhausting......fun, but exhausting.

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 10:50:58 PM
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.

I hope you meant interlude...

If not I'm totally lost...


When you think about it though, repetitive intercourse can be exhausting......fun, but exhausting.

I'm totally down with that, I've got 3 kids to prove it...

However he said DR was refreshing to a repetitive intercourse, so obviously he either digs DR more than intercourse or just doesn't dig exhausting intercourse...

Either way it's grounds for revocation of his man card...

Saxon73

Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.

I hope you meant interlude...

If not I'm totally lost...

Upstae,

Sorry for the vernacular of previous generations.  I wrote without thinking that educated individuals would understand more than sexual conotations.  Being probably at least a few generations older I just typed what I thought (or learned) years ago.
Intercourse can mean discussion or social dealings between individuals.  I understand as some posters in the past have commented on my "too correct" writings. Sorry for the confusion.
" No matter the differences, brilliance always finds a common ground."  -  Stephen Colbert

redswarm81

Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.

I hope you meant interlude...

If not I'm totally lost...

I don't see how "interlude" clarifies anything.  Quaalude maybe, but not interlude.

Maybe someone on weed can translate it for us.
Irritating SAT-lagging Union undergrads and alums since 1977

Doid23

Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PM
Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PM
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east.  For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice.  Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they?  So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested.  I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan.  Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly.  I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.

When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.

Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.

The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....

On Saxon Warriors!


Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case.   You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.

I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.

We'll see of course...


82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you.  Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.

Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.

leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing.  There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet. 

And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.



No barbs at AU? Really? "Never lived up to their billing in the past", "would lose 3 of 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher, "lose 4 of 5 to Rowan". Call them what you want, but they sound like barbs to me. You tried to soften it later by saying you said "they're not the beast of the east YET", but you know that's not what you said or think. Unless overhyped and mediocre are compliments.  I hope people that "like and respect" me, as you"like and respect" Alfred, have better things to say about me.

And I like how you discount Fisher's losses as to "giants", there is only one giant they played, and that is Mt. Union. Salisbury (3-2, lost by 14), Buff State (1-4) and Rochacha (1-4, won by 2) are certainly no "giants". SJF didn't schedule Ithaca, they're in their league, but they're certainly no giant this year either. And somehow Alfred's wins are suspect because of past Alfred teams. I don't follow. Could you be right? Sure. Could SJF be the "beast of the east" and Alfred mediocre? Yup. But the only thing you've got to base it on is what's happened in years past, certainly not on what's happened this year.


redswarm81

Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 11:11:41 PM
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM

Dear DR,

You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.

I hope you meant interlude...

If not I'm totally lost...

Upstae,

Sorry for the vernacular of previous generations.  I wrote without thinking that educated individuals would understand more than sexual conotations.  Being probably at least a few generations older I just typed what I thought (or learned) years ago.
Intercourse can mean discussion or social dealings between individuals.  I understand as some posters in the past have commented on my "too correct" writings. Sorry for the confusion.

73, I am of previous generations, and I (an engineer, even!) have acquired beaucoup negative karma for commenting on such trite subjects as lack of number and gender agreement in poster's sentences.

Nonetheless, even though I understand the intended meaning of "intercourse," the phrase "refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse" makes no sense to me.
Irritating SAT-lagging Union undergrads and alums since 1977

SJFF82

Quote from: Doid23 on October 11, 2009, 11:41:44 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PM
Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PM
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east.  For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice.  Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they?  So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested.  I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan.  Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly.  I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.

When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.

Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.

The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....

On Saxon Warriors!


Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case.   You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.

I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.

We'll see of course...


82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you.  Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.

Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.

leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing.  There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.  

And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.




 Could SJF be the "beast of the east" and Alfred mediocre? Yup. But the only thing you've got to base it on is what's happened in years past, certainly not on what's happened this year.



Again your and/or somebody else's words, not mine.  Clearly you Fisher haters out there were waiting for this point in the season to find a reason to start this feud.  I didnt remotely state or imply comments that had anything to do with Fisher's strength this year except to opine that they could win 3 0f 5 from AU.
 

My post was simply my opinion of AU as number 1.  Your analysis of my post clearly says more about your thought on the topic than mine as you go hyper analytical and put words in my mouth for each and every sentence.


Where did I call AU mediocre?  I said they were 5-7 (in the ERFP) at season's end.  If that is mediocre in the East then we are all in trouble.

Your whole post is clearly designed to start something that I didnt.



SJFF82

Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 09:17:37 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PM
Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PM
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PM
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east.  For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice.  Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they?  So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested.  I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan.  Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly.  I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.

When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.

Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.

The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....

On Saxon Warriors!


Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case.   You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.

I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.

We'll see of course...


82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you.  Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.

Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.

leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing.  There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.  

And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.





....I bet the competition now is alot better than when you played as well.....you should be proud.


Not really.  Except for the 2 MUC games.  We played RPI, BUFF ST, Brockport and a decent UR team every year.  Its all relative of course.

Am I supposed to care about people's posts to you in private because they are too worried about their 'Image' out in the open?  Hmmm...that seems to reflect some good wholesome character.

Seriously though, what BS?  That I  made the simple statement that I disagree with AU's #1?

I will play along though with this fire you Fisher haters are starting. 



maxpower

Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 07:14:21 AM
Clearly you Fisher haters out there were waiting for this point in the season to find a reason to start this feud.

Actually, this time last Friday, I was hoping Fisher would no longer be in the discussion....

dlippiel

WOW, getting ****in hot in here!!!!  :o

PBR...

Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't.  It's the same sh!t every year.  <yawn>

As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise.  There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise. 

And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.

this is where pbr disagrees...dvc should definetly be in the discussion and for pbr they should be ranked ahead of albright... comparing who the teams have played dvc's record is more impressive than albrights. dvc has only lost to #5 team wesley. they have beaten a good kean team and johns hopkins team. who has albright played that is a good team?  looks like d3football.com's poll is out and agree w/ pbr's assessment and has dvc now in the top 25 and albright only receiving votes....