East Region Fan Poll

[SJFF82]

I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year.  They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.

I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.

did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?

"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17.  Did the second half count?

Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?

Are you saying that Utica is a very good team?

[SJFF82]

I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year.  They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.

I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.

did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?

"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17.  Did the second half count?

Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?

What???  No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post.  How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results.  Except that you almost lost to them as well.

I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words.  "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters

[theoriginalupstate]

I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year.  They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.

I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.

did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?

"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17.  Did the second half count?

Yeah I don't think I've seen one this year...

[maxpower]

Dude can you really not see connections? Stop blowing up about the plight of "Fisher fans", the only one anyone in here has a gripe with is YOU.

Look:

did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?

"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17.  Did the second half count?

Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?

What???  No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post.  How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results.  Except that you almost lost to them as well.

I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words.  "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters

In YOUR bolded part, you seem to be saying that tecmo shouldn't only ascribe the win to Ithaca playing poorly, because it was a blowout. You're saying that Fisher must have played very well in order for it to be a blowout.

I'M saying that that is not necessarily true; Fisher could still be a bad team and blowout an even "badder" team. (IC)


And no, you never said Fisher was a very good team. You are, however, a Fisher fan that started all this by saying that Alfred would lose 3 out of 5 games to five top eastern teams including Fisher. That to me seems to mean that you think Fisher is a top 5 team in the east, at least.

[SJFF82]

Dude can you really not see connections? Stop blowing up about the plight of "Fisher fans", the only one anyone in here has a gripe with is YOU.

Look:

did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?

"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17.  Did the second half count?

Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?

What???  No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post.  How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results.  Except that you almost lost to them as well.

I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words.  "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters

In YOUR bolded part, you seem to be saying that tecmo shouldn't only ascribe the win to Ithaca playing poorly, because it was a blowout. You're saying that Fisher must have played very well in order for it to be a blowout.

I'M saying that that is not necessarily true; Fisher could still be a bad team and blowout an even "badder" team. (IC)


And no, you never said Fisher was a very good team. You are, however, a Fisher fan that started all this by saying that Alfred would lose 3 out of 5 games to five top eastern teams including Fisher. That to me seems to mean that you think Fisher is a top 5 team in the east, at least.

your logic is poor to say the least.  Of course Fisher is a quality team....they beat Ithaca #20 in the Nation at their house by a ton. They outrushed them by 300 yrds.

And your lame response is Fisher is not elite (which I clearly never said or implied) because they beat a "badder" Ithaca team.  Your whole silly argument is premised upon something I never said in the first place.  Fine Ithaca is "badder", in fact they down right suck according to you because Fisher sucks and the only way a sucky Fisher team can pound Ithaca into South Hill is if Ithaca is suckier.

Now that you have successfully made a circular argument attributing thingsto me I never said....can we know where you really stand?

Is Fisher a quality team that absolutely pounded another quality team

Or did a quality team (Ithaca) just have a very bad day and a ****ty Fisher team was able to capitalize?

[SJFF82]

Dude can you really not see connections? Stop blowing up about the plight of "Fisher fans", the only one anyone in here has a gripe with is YOU.

Look:

did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?

"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17.  Did the second half count?

Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?

What???  No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post.  How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results.  Except that you almost lost to them as well.

I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words.  "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters

I'M saying that that is not necessarily true; Fisher could still be a bad team and blowout an even "badder" team. (IC)

that is just plain hogwash.  This statement should be shot.  Does anyone think that Number 20 Ithaca was a "badder" team that "bad" Fisher beat?

Or is Fisher a decent team that monkeystomped Ithaca and now some bitter IC posters have their panties in a bunch over a simple comment I made about ANOTHER SCHOOL'S RANKING. 

[maxpower]

I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.

I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.

I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.

Then, I pointed out that while you never said Fisher was a very good team, you implied it while talking about ANOTHER SCHOOL'S RANKING:

I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher.

Now you've called Fisher a "quality team." Maybe, to end all this, you should describe the difference between "quality", "very good", and "would beat the consensus #1 East team 3 out of 5 times".

You don't have to, though...

[SJFF82]

I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.

I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.

I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.

Then, I pointed out that while you never said Fisher was a very good team, you implied it while talking about ANOTHER SCHOOL'S RANKING:

I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher.

Now you've called Fisher a "quality team." Maybe, to end all this, you should describe the difference between "quality", "very good", and "would beat the consensus #1 East team 3 out of 5 times".

You don't have to, though...

I'll use your logic...maybe AU is just "badder" than a "bad" Fisher team.

Is it such a stretch to figure SJF could beat AU a mere majority of the time after what I witnessed in Tompkins Co. thjis past Sat?

[maxpower]

Now you've called Fisher a "quality team." Maybe, to end all this, you should describe the difference between "quality", "very good", and "would beat the consensus #1 East team 3 out of 5 times".

You don't have to, though...

[maxpower]

maxpower: first East Region poster to have an entire board dedicated to him?

[SJFF82]

maxpower: first East Region poster to have an entire board dedicated to him?

COOL +K

[pg04]

How about this?  Compared to the powers in D3 football, you ALL suck!

[redswarm81]

I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.

I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.

I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.

Unrelated to this ongoing Creed - Balboa prizefight/Wrestlemania Steel Cage Death Match, I'm really struck by this comment, since it parallels a lot of my thinking/impressions.

I had no clue about any team's quality before Week 1.  However, those in the know said Ithaca was better than all but nine teams nationally.  Those same knowers said that Union sucked enough to receive zero Top 25 votes. St. John Fisher received enough votes for low spots to "rank" no. 32, two spots behind 2008's Ithaca killer, Curry.

After the first week, Ithaca was voted better than all but seven teams nationally, and SJF's pounding by MUC pushed them down to "no. 41."  Union continued to poll as suck.

Then, in Union's first game, they took it to Ithaca. (RS81's head begins to expand from a buildup of pressure)

Union follows that up with a loss to Muhlenberg, who has since looked barely better than mediocre, if that good.  (Pressure continues to build)

Ithaca strings together a few unimpressive wins, while SJFisher travels the country getting its @$$ handed to it.  SJF returns to NY, squeaks past Rochacha, and lays a monkeystomp on Ithaca.

My head is reaching the bursting point.  Is Union any good?  They beat Hobart, who's having a disappointing season.  How'd Union, 3-0 in the LL, lose to Muhlenberg, and beat Ithaca?  How'd SJFisher lose to Salisbury, and mash Ithaca into the turf?

I'm so confused.

[dlippiel]

I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.

I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.

I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.

Unrelated to this ongoing Creed - Balboa prizefight/Wrestlemania Steel Cage Death Match, I'm really struck by this comment, since it parallels a lot of my thinking/impressions.

I had no clue about any team's quality before Week 1.  However, those in the know said Ithaca was better than all but nine teams nationally.  Those same knowers said that Union sucked enough to receive zero Top 25 votes. St. John Fisher received enough votes for low spots to "rank" no. 32, two spots behind 2008's Ithaca killer, Curry.

After the first week, Ithaca was voted better than all but seven teams nationally, and SJF's pounding by MUC pushed them down to "no. 41."  Union continued to poll as suck.

Then, in Union's first game, they took it to Ithaca. (RS81's head begins to expand from a buildup of pressure)

Union follows that up with a loss to Muhlenberg, who has since looked barely better than mediocre, if that good.  (Pressure continues to build)

Ithaca strings together a few unimpressive wins, while SJFisher travels the country getting its @$$ handed to it.  SJF returns to NY, squeaks past Rochacha, and lays a monkeystomp on Ithaca.

My head is reaching the bursting point.  Is Union any good?  They beat Hobart, who's having a disappointing season.  How'd Union, 3-0 in the LL, lose to Muhlenberg, and beat Ithaca?  How'd SJFisher lose to Salisbury, and mash Ithaca into the turf?

I'm so confused.

Very good questions here RS. dlip can give you an answer...WHO THE **** KNOWS! dlip follows Union with his heart and soul and still cannot figure this team out as well as many others in our beautiful region here in the ****in East. dlip came away from Saturday feeling Union may actually be weaker than he thought unimpressed with many aspects of the Dutch game. Yet then he says, well they outplayed a supposedly solid Ithaca team, yet that solid Ithaca team got ****in vibrated by SJF who in turn got homoginized by Salisbury. Right now dlip looks at it this way, he is figuring in two weeks when Union goes down to Salisibury we will learn a lot about the East as a result of the outcome of that game.

[theoriginalupstate]

How about this?  Compared to the powers in D3 football, you ALL suck!

This year the East is basically the fat kid in dodgeball...