East Region Fan Poll

Started by pg04, July 05, 2007, 09:44:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PBR...

Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:03:21 PM
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 11:57:24 AM
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AM
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AM
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM


Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.

Did they turn their cards over against salisbury?  If you say so.  Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.   

What the hell is the SID going to do??  Put out a release about the call? 



dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.

not so sure that dvc had their azzes handed to them by wesley....dvc had 5 turnovers that day w/ 2 of them well into wesley territory as dvc was driving on them....if they were to play again dont think you would see that many errors/mistakes again and a much closer game if not a dvc win. easy on the how bad a stomping wesley put on dvc...

dlip hears pbr, but dude, when a team turns the ball over 5 ****in times in a game that is part of their performance as well as a prat of the other teams defensive performance. **** the U threw INT's against SLU like it was there job and got lucky to win the game. Yes U made mistakes but SLU deserves credit for causing those turnovers as well. No way would dlip come out and say, "well it shouldn't have been close because of our 5 turnovers... **** why didn't Wesley have 5 turnovers? Del val got beat and in dlip's mind did not seem to be very competitive with Wesley. If they were the score would have been closer.

did the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

dlippiel

Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

PBR...

Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PM
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it?  ;D

SJFF82

Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:30:10 PM
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 09:17:52 PM...and Q is the consumate 'frontrunner'...good thing you figured this out all on your own...Pet Detective.  Smell that dog ****....its Ithaca's legacy in Fisher's rearview mirror.

Which thing makes you think I am a frontrunner again?

-Is it waiting to care about my alma mater's football team until some kids turn my former club team around and make it into a winner 20 years after I slip off campus into anonymity?

-Or was it when I waited for the outcome of a game to taunt an opponent?


-Maybe it was the time everyone called me out so I took my ball, went home, and came back under an assumed identity in the hopes that I could play well with others?



once again Q, dont let the facts get in the way of a good post.  I fall into this trap every time, but why again do you think I played club ball?  And if I did, what does that have to do with you being a coward about how you go about your disdain for Fisher in your posts.  


SJFF82

Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 11:56:54 AM
Dont forget Salisbury is a triple option team if Im not mistaken.  That can be good or bad for some defenses.  Union had some small but tough d-backs from what I remember.  That may give them an edge on defense.

good point, in the 2006 reg season, SJF lost to SC and Chris Sharpe, giving up 7 tds to Sharpe alone.  They also rebounded and handed the East  (both conf. and OOC) its lunch before falling to MUC in a relatively close game.

That loss seemed to be an aberration due to the trip option.

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PM
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PM
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it?  ;D

The loss in and of itself doesn't sting.  What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...

That's what stings...

Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...

SJFF82

Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PM
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PM
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it?  ;D

yep...it stung the whole ride home. 

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 11:56:54 AM
Dont forget Salisbury is a triple option team if Im not mistaken.  That can be good or bad for some defenses.  Union had some small but tough d-backs from what I remember.  That may give them an edge on defense.

They are a triple option team however they have a much better passing attack than anything Springfield has ever had while the Pride have been running it...

They have an actual legit QB running it, not just another RB that sometimes throws the ball like SC does...


PBR...

Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PM
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PM
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PM
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it?  ;D

The loss in and of itself doesn't sting.  What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...

That's what stings...

Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...

LOL...based on your response pbr just rubbed salt and alcohol in that open wound...ouch must be tough to go through life that bitter still...

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 01:05:04 PM
Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PM
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PM
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PM
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it?  ;D

The loss in and of itself doesn't sting.  What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...

That's what stings...

Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...

LOL...based on your response pbr just rubbed salt and alcohol in that open wound...ouch must be tough to go through life that bitter still...

I will say that it had nothing to do with anything DVC did that day...


SJFF82

Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AM
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AM
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM


Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.

Did they turn their cards over against salisbury?  If you say so.  Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.   

What the hell is the SID going to do??  Put out a release about the call? 



dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.

I think Booby addressed this perception v. reality issue.  While the perception is that AU, at 5-0, is the East's ACE right now, the reality does not play out until Saterday when they take on the Cardinals.  Can you see why Fisher fans could care a less about perception right about now?

lewdogg11

Ty, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?

SJFF82

Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:13:00 PM
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 01:05:04 PM
Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PM
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PM
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PM
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes  and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td?  so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?

Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.

exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it?  ;D

The loss in and of itself doesn't sting.  What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...

That's what stings...

Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...

LOL...based on your response pbr just rubbed salt and alcohol in that open wound...ouch must be tough to go through life that bitter still...

I will say that it had nothing to do with anything DVC did that day...



a coach?

theoriginalupstate

Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 01:14:14 PM
Ty, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?

Ha, Corey Jackson is my hero!


SJFF82

Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 01:14:14 PM
Ty, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?

No, but I did beat a blocking bag with a tree limb on scout team defense to prepare our O-line for the bass drum cadence that Galludet used back in '92 as a Freshman.