East Region Fan Poll

[AUKaz00]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.


Week 2 Fan Poll  

Team	Record	Points	Last Rating	Next Week
1   Delaware Valley( 6 )	2-0	78	1	at #1 Wesley*
2   St. John Fisher( 2 )	2-0	72	2	at Rochester
3   Montclair State	1-0	63	3	vs. #8 Rowan
4   Alfred	1-0	46	4	at St. Lawrence
5   Cortland State	1-0	42	6	vs. Buffalo State
6   Hobart	1-0	39	7	at Carnegie Mellon
7   Ithaca	2-0	34	9	at Widener
8   Rowan	1-0	32	8	at #3 Montclair State
9   Springfield	2-0	24	10	at Wilkes
10  Union	0-1	3	5	Open Date

Also Receiving votes:              
Curry 2
Kean 2
Lycoming 1
RPI 1
Utica 1
                    
            
Voting Distribution:            

Delaware Valley (1,1,1,NR,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,NR,1,3,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,NR,4,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (3,5,6,NR,9,7,4,NR,4,4)
Cortland (7,4,3,NR,3,5,9,NR,8,7)
Hobart (5,6,7,NR,6,6,7,NR,6,6)
Ithaca (8,7,5,NR,5,8,6,NR,7,8)
Rowan (9,8,8,NR,8,4,5,NR,5,9)
Springfield(6,9,9,NR,7,9,8,NR,NR,5)
Union (10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Kean (NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)


Key Matchups:
#1 Delaware Valley at #1 Wesley*
#8 Rowan at #3 Montclair State


*Wesley ranking from South Region Week 1 Fan Poll

[rams1102]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.


Week 2 Fan Poll  

Team	Record	Points	Last Rating	Next Week
1   Delaware Valley( 6 )	2-0	78	1	at #1 Wesley*
2   St. John Fisher( 2 )	2-0	72	2	at Rochester
3   Montclair State	1-0	63	3	vs. #8 Rowan
4   Alfred	1-0	46	4	at St. Lawrence
5   Cortland State	1-0	42	6	vs. Buffalo State
6   Hobart	1-0	39	7	at Carnegie Mellon
7   Ithaca	2-0	34	9	at Widener
8   Rowan	1-0	32	8	at #3 Montclair State
9   Springfield	2-0	24	10	at Wilkes
10  Union	0-1	3	5	Open Date

Also Receiving votes:              
Curry 2
Kean 2
Lycoming 1
RPI 1
Utica 1
                    
            
Voting Distribution:            

Delaware Valley (1,1,1,NR,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,NR,1,3,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,NR,4,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (3,5,6,NR,9,7,4,NR,4,4)
Cortland (7,4,3,NR,3,5,9,NR,8,7)
Hobart (5,6,7,NR,6,6,7,NR,6,6)
Ithaca (8,7,5,NR,5,8,6,NR,7,8)
Rowan (9,8,8,NR,8,4,5,NR,5,9)
Springfield(6,9,9,NR,7,9,8,NR,NR,5)
Union (10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Kean (NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)


Key Matchups:
#1 Delaware Valley at #1 Wesley*
#8 Rowan at #3 Montclair State


*Wesley ranking from South Region Week 1 Fan Poll

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

[AUPepBand]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

[theoriginalupstate]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

I always get my poll in on time...

I've got 4 kids as evidence...

[rams1102]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

I always get my poll in on time...

I've got 4 kids as evidence...

Great line. +K

[Knightstalker]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

I always get my poll in on time...

I've got 4 kids as evidence...

In on time or just don't get out in time?

[dlippiel]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

I always get my poll in on time...

I've got 4 kids as evidence...

In on time or just don't get out in time?

Could be a little of both

[rams1102]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

I always get my poll in on time...

I've got 4 kids as evidence...

In on time or just don't get out in time?

I think that is called a pulloutie.  Git'R Done

[SJFF82]

I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week.  I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.

Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.

Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.

I always get my poll in on time...

I've got 4 kids as evidence...

In on time or just don't get out in time?

82 has 4 as well and believes the latter of KS' statement/question applies for his situation....

[Yanks 99]

I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas.  This should be my last one for the rest of the year.  Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):


1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union

I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle.  Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10.  I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10.  Del Valley made a big jump to #3.

I

[rams1102]

I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas.  This should be my last one for the rest of the year.  Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):


1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union

I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle.  Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10.  I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10.  Del Valley made a big jump to #3.

I don't see how you don't have Del Val #1 after they beat a Top 25 tean (W&J). Cortland played a tough team in Kean, won on their turf and should get more love. Fisher and Montclair (I'm a Montclair homer) have not played a tough team and should be below Del Val. We are all entitled to our opinions and that's why this is fun.

[theoriginalupstate]

I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas.  This should be my last one for the rest of the year.  Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):


1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union

I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle.  Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10.  I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10.  Del Valley made a big jump to #3.

I don't see how you don't have Del Val #1 after they beat a Top 25 tean (W&J). Cortland played a tough team in Kean, won on their turf and should get more love. Fisher and Montclair (I'm a Montclair homer) have not played a tough team and should be below Del Val. We are all entitled to our opinions and that's why this is fun.

Agree...

DVC deserves to be #1 until they lose a game...

[dlippiel]

I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas.  This should be my last one for the rest of the year.  Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):


1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union

I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle.  Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10.  I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10.  Del Valley made a big jump to #3.

I don't see how you don't have Del Val #1 after they beat a Top 25 tean (W&J). Cortland played a tough team in Kean, won on their turf and should get more love. Fisher and Montclair (I'm a Montclair homer) have not played a tough team and should be below Del Val. We are all entitled to our opinions and that's why this is fun.

Agree...

DVC deserves to be #1 until they lose a game...

dlip feels that one is warrented if they have SJF in the mix with Del Val regarding the #1 and #2 positions.

[Garnet]

Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. 

[AUKaz00]

Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. 

That's the kind of question that'll get you a nickname on the NESCAC board!