WBB: Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

[The Champ]

Your wish is my command.

I thought of doing something like that, but decided against it.

Hilarious....

Now you're going to be on his crap list too - especially if you don't go on and on how GREAT Messick plays tomorrow night....

Did you know, she's the greatest player in the WIAC over the last 5 years...

[PRF2009A]

Your wish is my command.

I thought of doing something like that, but decided against it.

Hilarious....

Now you're going to be on his crap list too - especially if you don't go on and on how GREAT Messick plays tomorrow night....

Did you know, she's the greatest player in the WIAC over the last 5 years...

Not on my crap list, not worried about how Messick plays tomorrow, already stated I was just complimenting a competitor, not sure what else you want to hear, will be more careful about complimenting players outside of Stout. 


Good luck to all teams playing tomorrow night.  Signing off until next year.  Peace and safety to all, including Champ.

[buf]

This weeks region rankings

Central Region Record Overall Record
1. Illinois Wesleyan 21-1 24-1
2. Carthage 19-2 22-3
3. Washington U. 19-2 22-2
4. Chicago 19-5 19-5
5. UW-Whitewater 18-5 19-6
6. St. Norbert 20-3 20-3

[buf]

Congrats to coach Englund on win #200 at UWEC.

[Just Bill]

I believe the tech was on Coach Holbrook.  She was speaking with the ref and then he called the foul and pointed to her, although it was the most calm technical foul I've ever seen, so I'm guessing she must have said something.

That's what I saw too.  But in the stats it's says the T was charged to the bench.  Maybe that's how they list it all the time - I don't know.

Technical fouls on the head coach are assigned to the bench. The head coach is responsible for any T on an assistant coach, manager, trainer, etc.  So a head coach could be tossed for two bench T's even if they didn't actually get one themselves.

[wisco87]

That was my point.  I wasn't complaining about who the fouls were being called against - just the sudden timing of the change in how the game was being called.  Consistency went out the window after that T foul.

The RF runs started at about the 11 minute mark and lasted about 2 minutes, fueled by 4 fouls against Stout and some excellent play by the RF team, bringing the Stout lead down to 18 points.

After that, things settled down and the lead floated between 15 and 21 points, with the final score 86 - 70.


Sounds like it was a great game.  I had a 2 hour drive home, so chatted with the players for about 30 minutes and headed home...

Great quote about consistency going out the window, because that basically sums it up.  All in all, I thought it was a strange way to officiate the end of a game with a 20 point lead. 

[UWRF]

But then the game changed.  A technical was called against the RF bench (don't know what happened) with about 13 minutes to go.

After the technical, the refs must have decided to call anything that looked remotely like a foul.

I am not completely sure, but I think the technical was on Tiffany Gregorich.  She jumped off the bench after a no-call went against her sister.  She appeared to be yelling and didnt want to sit down.

My color commentator made a great point... "if she has that much energy why isnt she in the game?"

Tiffany had mono and was a game time decision for lasts night game.

[The Champ]

...will be more careful about complimenting players outside of Stout. 

Hey, what's wrong with complimenting a player.

I have clearly stated that Hannah Messick is a very good player. 

You have continually tried to portray Messick as a great player - going so far as to say she's the best in the WIAC over the last 5 years. 

When you originally made that point - I took you to task.  If you'd go back and look, my initial post stated that she wasn't the best player on her own team in the last 5 years.

It was the rest of this board that took you to task, pointing out that Hirssig was the best player in the WIAC this year.

After the game on Tuesday you tried to project her as a player that was great because she played defense too.

Well, if you're going to make these bold kind of statements, you should be prepared to back them up.

If you can't, then maybe you shouldn't be making them.

[The Champ]

Technical fouls on the head coach are assigned to the bench. The head coach is responsible for any T on an assistant coach, manager, trainer, etc.  So a head coach could be tossed for two bench T's even if they didn't actually get one themselves.

Thanks for the clarification!

I am not completely sure, but I think the technical was on Tiffany Gregorich.  She jumped off the bench after a no-call went against her sister.  She appeared to be yelling and didnt want to sit down.

That's probably it.  I didn't see what happened - was watching the action on the court.  But as soon as the whistle blew and the T was called - I looked a Cindy and she seemed completely calm at the time - not the attitude typically shown by a HC after having a T called on them individually.

[wisco87]

Technical fouls on the head coach are assigned to the bench. The head coach is responsible for any T on an assistant coach, manager, trainer, etc.  So a head coach could be tossed for two bench T's even if they didn't actually get one themselves.

Thanks for the clarification!

I am not completely sure, but I think the technical was on Tiffany Gregorich.  She jumped off the bench after a no-call went against her sister.  She appeared to be yelling and didnt want to sit down.

That's probably it.  I didn't see what happened - was watching the action on the court.  But as soon as the whistle blew and the T was called - I looked a Cindy and she seemed completely calm at the time - not the attitude typically shown by a HC after having a T called on them individually.

Yeah that does make sense.  I saw the ref speaking with Coach Holbrook for awhile, but both were pretty calm, so they may have been  speaking about why he was calling the tech.
That's probably it.  I didn't see what happened - was watching the action on the court.  But as soon as the whistle blew and the T was called - I looked a Cindy and she seemed completely calm at the time - not the attitude typically shown by a HC after having a T called on them individually.

[badgerwarhawk]

Not on my crap list, not worried about how Messick plays tomorrow, already stated I was just complimenting a competitor, not sure what else you want to hear, will be more careful about complimenting players outside of Stout. 
Good luck to all teams playing tomorrow night.  Signing off until next year.  Peace and safety to all, including Champ.

I was just messing around because I had time to kill between appointments.  No offense intended it was just one of those things that I just couldn't help myself.  That's why I included the smiley/winking guys after. 

Messick is a load and we'll have to control her to have a shot at winning tonight.  Everyone down here knows that. 

[UWRF]

I would like to clarify that the technical was in fact on Cindy. It was not on Tiffany.

[The Champ]

I would like to clarify that the technical was in fact on Cindy. It was not on Tiffany.

Thanks for the clarification.  From your previous post it sure seemed like you were telling us it was on Tiffany:

I am not completely sure, but I think the technical was on Tiffany Gregorich.  She jumped off the bench after a no-call went against her sister.  She appeared to be yelling and didnt want to sit down.

[UWRF]

Yeah originally that was a theory that I had. But I received clarification that it was NOT on Tiffany. 

[bulk19]

EC gets a road "W" at La Crosse, 68-62. Mesick and Plendl again the key, but Laura Olson chipped in with 13 and had just one turnover. 'Golds had 14, but that's a pretty good number for them lately. They also knocked down their FT's down the stretch.

Can't figure out why Mesick is playing D3 basketball.  She would be a welcome addition to a ton of D2 teams.  Wouldn't be a stretch to say she is the best D3 player I have ever seen play over the last 4 years.

Is it just me, or is this topic being drug out by someone who has continually mischaracterized what was originally said here???

"The best D3 player I have ever seen play over the last 4 years" has been conveniently been skipped, and changed into the best player in the WIAC, which is not what is being said.

Seems to me the key inference that should be drawn here is "seen play" suggests seen in person... (What, heaven forbid, if PRF2009A has not seen Stout play over the last five years??? Egads; Hirssig would therefore not be considered in one's opinion. Duh.)

Let me, using an analogy, explain this slowly, for anyone who doesn't seem to understand here, and wants to continually misconstrue things with facts, rather than accept what was an opinion based merely on one's observation:

Joe Mauer may be the best baseball player I have ever seen IN PERSON over the last five years. But I haven't seen Albert Pujols, A-Rod and many others over the last five years.
Now one can argue by throwing stats around all day that they are all better than Mauer, right?

But the fact remains, it would not be a stretch to say Mauer is the best ballplayer I have seen play over the last five years...

Comprende???