FB: Region 3 fan poll

Started by Pat Coleman, June 23, 2008, 10:04:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ralph Turner

#915
South Region Fan Poll -- Week #4










TeamRecordPointsVotes
1)   UMHB 4-0481,1,1,2,2
2)   Wesley4-0471,1,2,2,2
3)   JHU4-0393,3,3,3,4
4)   Thomas More3-1353,4,4,4,5
5)   Wash & Jeff4-0314,5,5,5,5
.....
6)    H-SC2-1196,7,7,8,8
T7)    Muhlenberg3-1176,6,7,9,10
7T)  Texas Lutheran     4-0176,6,7,8,x
9)   Guilford3-087,9,10,10,x
10T)   Rhodes4-049,9,x,x,x
10T)  Ursinus3-148,10,x,x,x
.....
RV   Centre4-038,x,x,x,x
RV   ETBU3-129,x,x,x,x
RV)   Louisiana Coll2-2110,x,x,x,x
.....
Corrections are appreciated!

ksclegal

TLU 4-0  victories over Sul Ross, HSU, LC and SAGU

Ralph Turner


jknezek

So if anyone has noticed I've become embroiled in discussions on both the Top 25 Fan Poll and the North Region Fan Poll about the value of H2H wins. I wandered over to our poll to see if I could find a way to mess up this thread as well (kidding) and simply cannot. We're either doing something right, something wrong, or our region is really boring!   ;D

tigerfanalso

Jk

I appreciate all the work you guys put into the polls but I don't really pay any attention as "its only a number" and a persons opinion. The only poll that matters is the final poll. Keep up the good work because I'm certain most fans have a different opinion than I on this subject.

   

jknezek

I can't imagine why anyone would pay much attention to them, though they do pass the time and can make for some fun arguments. I probably wouldn't pay much attention if I wasn't involved. On the other hand, I truly enjoy being involved, even when I'm horribly wrong (see last week. Muhlenberg vs JHU). Fortunately I don't mind cleaning the egg off the following week...

SaintsFAN

Quote from: jknezek on October 01, 2014, 04:16:14 PM
I can't imagine why anyone would pay much attention to them, though they do pass the time and can make for some fun arguments. I probably wouldn't pay much attention if I wasn't involved. On the other hand, I truly enjoy being involved, even when I'm horribly wrong (see last week. Muhlenberg vs JHU). Fortunately I don't mind cleaning the egg off the following week...

Ditto -- I had Muhlenberg on my ballot prior to that debacle.
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs:  2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
Bridge Bowl Champs:  1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013 (SERIES OVER)
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009, 2010, 2015
Instances where MSJ quit the Bridge Bowl:  2

jknezek

Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 01, 2014, 04:30:05 PM
Quote from: jknezek on October 01, 2014, 04:16:14 PM
I can't imagine why anyone would pay much attention to them, though they do pass the time and can make for some fun arguments. I probably wouldn't pay much attention if I wasn't involved. On the other hand, I truly enjoy being involved, even when I'm horribly wrong (see last week. Muhlenberg vs JHU). Fortunately I don't mind cleaning the egg off the following week...

Ditto -- I had Muhlenberg on my ballot prior to that debacle.

I still have them at the bottom of my SRFP. But they aren't above JHU anymore. I thought JHU looked off and the Muhles had almost everyone back. Plus the game was at the Muhles. It had to be the year, right? Saw the score close to half time and muttered some words my wife was not happy with near the kids.

tigerfanalso

Jk

I've got your Generals beating GC based on W&L's performance against Centre and GC's performance against SVA.
So I might be muttering some words late Saturday afternoon as well.

wesleydad

Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 01, 2014, 04:30:05 PM
Quote from: jknezek on October 01, 2014, 04:16:14 PM
I can't imagine why anyone would pay much attention to them, though they do pass the time and can make for some fun arguments. I probably wouldn't pay much attention if I wasn't involved. On the other hand, I truly enjoy being involved, even when I'm horribly wrong (see last week. Muhlenberg vs JHU). Fortunately I don't mind cleaning the egg off the following week...

Ditto -- I had Muhlenberg on my ballot prior to that debacle.

Me three on the Mules.  Had them right after JHU and thought they had a good chance of winning.  I have Wash and Jeff ahead of Thomas More right now, so this week will prove me right or wrong once again.

umhb2001

Quote from: ksclegal on September 30, 2014, 10:43:15 PM
TLU 4-0  victories over Sul Ross, HSU, LC and SAGU

One quality win out of four does not a vote assure.
Watch out for the wreckingCRU defense!!

Ralph Turner

Quote from: umhb2001 on October 01, 2014, 09:40:07 PM
Quote from: ksclegal on September 30, 2014, 10:43:15 PM
TLU 4-0  victories over Sul Ross, HSU, LC and SAGU

One quality win out of four does not a vote assure.
Thanks for the comment
The question is whether the voter believes that TLU can beat the teams farther down the ballot.

My impression is the rest of the ASC would win or compete very strongly with the rest of the South Region conferences.  I think that TLU is a solid 6,7,8. I think that the ASC runner-up is second tier Top 10.  My "line" for the Wesley game is Wesley by 17 at home against LaCollege for LaCollege to hold my vote for them at #10.

Rhetorically, what would your ballot look like? :)

SaintsFAN

Quote from: wesleydad on October 01, 2014, 08:45:33 PM
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 01, 2014, 04:30:05 PM
Quote from: jknezek on October 01, 2014, 04:16:14 PM
I can't imagine why anyone would pay much attention to them, though they do pass the time and can make for some fun arguments. I probably wouldn't pay much attention if I wasn't involved. On the other hand, I truly enjoy being involved, even when I'm horribly wrong (see last week. Muhlenberg vs JHU). Fortunately I don't mind cleaning the egg off the following week...

Ditto -- I had Muhlenberg on my ballot prior to that debacle.

Me three on the Mules.  Had them right after JHU and thought they had a good chance of winning.  I have Wash and Jeff ahead of Thomas More right now, so this week will prove me right or wrong once again.

I hope you're wrong again :)
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs:  2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
Bridge Bowl Champs:  1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013 (SERIES OVER)
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009, 2010, 2015
Instances where MSJ quit the Bridge Bowl:  2

jknezek

Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 02, 2014, 08:20:45 AM
Quote from: wesleydad on October 01, 2014, 08:45:33 PM
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 01, 2014, 04:30:05 PM
Quote from: jknezek on October 01, 2014, 04:16:14 PM
I can't imagine why anyone would pay much attention to them, though they do pass the time and can make for some fun arguments. I probably wouldn't pay much attention if I wasn't involved. On the other hand, I truly enjoy being involved, even when I'm horribly wrong (see last week. Muhlenberg vs JHU). Fortunately I don't mind cleaning the egg off the following week...

Ditto -- I had Muhlenberg on my ballot prior to that debacle.

Me three on the Mules.  Had them right after JHU and thought they had a good chance of winning.  I have Wash and Jeff ahead of Thomas More right now, so this week will prove me right or wrong once again.

I hope you're wrong again :)

I've got TMC just ahead of W&J, actually might have Hopkins in the middle. Can't remember. Either way, TMC on the road is my pick, but I'm sweating it. Hoping that game against Wesley toughened up the Saints enough to get over the road hill. I think they should, hence the rankings, but...

jknezek

Quote from: tigerfanalso on October 01, 2014, 04:44:35 PM
Jk

I've got your Generals beating GC based on W&L's performance against Centre and GC's performance against SVA.
So I might be muttering some words late Saturday afternoon as well.

Bold. Even I won't go there, and I love my Generals! Guilford is just good right now. W&L just isn't. W&L on the road? Guilford with the extra week to prepare? W&L is going to have to find another gear to pull out a win. I haven't seen evidence of that gear yet.