FB: Region 3 fan poll

Started by Pat Coleman, June 23, 2008, 10:04:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

E.115

#1260
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 31, 2016, 02:49:12 PM
The close call by CWRU against Geneva was enough for me to drop them off the ballot after Week #8.


Geneva was mid-terms week for CWRU...perhaps too many engineers and science majors on the team ... :) ;)

E.115

Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 31, 2016, 04:59:32 PM

I feel like Westminster is the last big hurdle.  Westminster pounds the rock from the spread with a very good RB and athletic QB, much like Case does.  These two teams are mirror images of one another.  I'm more than a little bit skeptical of CWRU's defense; but we'll see.

Especially facing a Westminster team coming off a loss can be scary for CWRU. 

The 56-38 win against WashU saw 1233 yards of combined total offense.  Defense for CWRU needs to figure something out rather quickly.  http://athletics.case.edu/sports/fball/2016-17/boxscores/20161029_c8ei.xml

Ralph Turner

Week #9 South Region Poll

Thanks to my fellow pollsters: Hasanova, jknezek, roocru, Scots 13.











1)  UMHB             50                  1,1,1,1,1
2)  HSU442,2,2,2,3
3)  JHU412,3,3,3,3
4)  Thomas More 354,4,4,4,4
5)  ETBU    265,5,6,6,7
....
6)  CWRU    255,6,6,6,7
7)  Muhlenberg205,5,7,8,10
8)  Huntingdon   137,8,8,8,x
9)  Randy-Mac  69,9,10,10,x
10) Maryville TN  49,9,x,x,x
....
RV)  Berry 38,x,x,x,x
RV)  Centre 39,10,x,x,x
RV)  Southwestern TX    110,x,x,x,x
.. ..
....
....



As always, corrections are appreciated.

ADL70

Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 31, 2016, 04:59:32 PM

I feel like Westminster is the last big hurdle.  Westminster pounds the rock from the spread with a very good RB and athletic QB, much like Case does.  These two teams are mirror images of one another.  I'm more than a little bit skeptical of CWRU's defense; but we'll see.

Westminster did not run the ball well vs CMU, only 113 yds net (36 on one play, -25 on 4 sacks).  And backup QB played all but the first two plays of second half and his was the 36 yd run.
SPARTANS...PREPARE FOR GLORY
HA-WOO, HA-WOO, HA-WOO
Think beyond the possible.
Compete, Win, Respect, Unite

SaintsFAN

Quote from: ADL70 on November 01, 2016, 04:21:06 PM
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 31, 2016, 04:59:32 PM

I feel like Westminster is the last big hurdle.  Westminster pounds the rock from the spread with a very good RB and athletic QB, much like Case does.  These two teams are mirror images of one another.  I'm more than a little bit skeptical of CWRU's defense; but we'll see.

Westminster did not run the ball well vs CMU, only 113 yds net (36 on one play, -25 on 4 sacks).  And backup QB played all but the first two plays of second half and his was the 36 yd run.

I believe CMU's defense to be superior to Case's.  They held Thomas More to 20 points and thats the only time this year the Saints haven't scored at least 30 points. 

The QB I'm referring to is Columbo.  VERY athletic but not so much an accurate passer.  If they found a QB who can be efficient, they'll be better offensively. 

But I definitely think you're sleeping on the CMU defense.
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs:  2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
Bridge Bowl Champs:  1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013 (SERIES OVER)
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009, 2010, 2015
Instances where MSJ quit the Bridge Bowl:  2

ADL70

#1265
Columbo is listed as prob starter for Saturday, he left last game after a run on second play of third quarter and didn't return.  From half a game's sample his backup Salmen was a more efficient passer.

CMU and CWRU has similar rushing yards given up vs WashU, but that's not the strength of their offense.  CMU did a much better job stopping Geneva's runs (perhaps because of their familiarity with the option).  CWRU held Thiel to 30 fewer rushing yards than CMU did, against a similarly athletic QB.

For the season CWRU is giving up about 60 fewer rushing yards/game than CMU (although against mostly lesser competition).  I'm more concerned about Spartans' pass defense than run.

You could say that CWRU's playoffs started last week, as they probably need to win out to make the field.  Although they just cracked the top 200 in SoS and will continue to climb.
SPARTANS...PREPARE FOR GLORY
HA-WOO, HA-WOO, HA-WOO
Think beyond the possible.
Compete, Win, Respect, Unite

SaintsFAN

Quote from: ADL70 on November 02, 2016, 11:27:30 AM
You could say that CWRU's playoffs started last week, as they probably need to win out to make the field.  Although they just cracked the top 200 in SoS and will continue to climb.

We'll agree on this above.

But I think the rushing numbers are affected by CMU playing better competition and having closer games as a result. 

I don't think just listing the rushing numbers helps -- besides, its not like we are comparing two teams that aren't going to play one another.  CMU and Case play next week.

One of us will be right. 
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs:  2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
Bridge Bowl Champs:  1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013 (SERIES OVER)
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009, 2010, 2015
Instances where MSJ quit the Bridge Bowl:  2

ADL70

I wasn't suggesting that CWRU's defense is better, only that they are comparable.
SPARTANS...PREPARE FOR GLORY
HA-WOO, HA-WOO, HA-WOO
Think beyond the possible.
Compete, Win, Respect, Unite

Scots13

#1268
First regional rankings for the South:

1. Mary Hardin-Baylor
2. Johns Hopkins
3. Hardin-Simmons
4. Case Western Reserve
5. Thomas More
6. Muhlenberg
7. Berry
8. Maryville
9. East Texas Baptist
10. Randolph-Macon

Playing it safe at the back half. Berry has Centre left, Maryville has Huntingdon, ETBU has HSU. RMC has Guilford and HSC to finish. They are in position to win out and move up in future rankings; the others can be replaced easily, although if ETBU has a close loss to #3 HSU what will be their fate?

Also surprised a little ETBU is ninth. They are ranked #21 in both the d3football.com and AFCA Coaches' polls. 6, 7, 8 are unranked.

Where Chilhowee's lofty mountains pierce the southern blue, proudly stands our Alma Mater
NOBLE, GRAND, and TRUE.
TO THE HILL!

Ralph Turner

Quote from: Scots13 on November 02, 2016, 03:24:26 PM
First regional rankings for the South:

1. Mary Hardin-Baylor
2. Johns Hopkins
3. Hardin-Simmons
4. Case Western Reserve
5. Thomas More
6. Muhlenberg
7. Berry
8. Maryville
9. East Texas Baptist
10. Randolph-Macon

Playing it safe at the back half. Berry has Centre left, Maryville has Huntingdon, ETBU has HSU. RMC has Guilford and HSC to finish. They are in position to win out and move up in future rankings; the others can be replaced easily, although if ETBU has a close loss to #3 HSU what will be their fate?

Also surprised a little ETBU is ninth. They are ranked #21 in both the d3football.com and AFCA Coaches' polls. 6, 7, 8 are unranked.
Please understand that ETBU has one criterion that help with the rankings for the NCAA, a loss to UMHB.
The isolated ASC doesn't get much out of Texas boost to the OOWP.

Scots13

Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2016, 03:37:03 PM
Quote from: Scots13 on November 02, 2016, 03:24:26 PM
First regional rankings for the South:

1. Mary Hardin-Baylor
2. Johns Hopkins
3. Hardin-Simmons
4. Case Western Reserve
5. Thomas More
6. Muhlenberg
7. Berry
8. Maryville
9. East Texas Baptist
10. Randolph-Macon

Playing it safe at the back half. Berry has Centre left, Maryville has Huntingdon, ETBU has HSU. RMC has Guilford and HSC to finish. They are in position to win out and move up in future rankings; the others can be replaced easily, although if ETBU has a close loss to #3 HSU what will be their fate?

Also surprised a little ETBU is ninth. They are ranked #21 in both the d3football.com and AFCA Coaches' polls. 6, 7, 8 are unranked.
Please understand that ETBU has one criterion that help with the rankings for the NCAA, a loss to UMHB.
The isolated ASC doesn't get much out of Texas boost to the OOWP.

Duly noted. I guess the 64-62 game last Saturday didn't help.
Where Chilhowee's lofty mountains pierce the southern blue, proudly stands our Alma Mater
NOBLE, GRAND, and TRUE.
TO THE HILL!

RtSLl3100

I know its been a topic most the week; but surprised CWRU is ahead of Thomas More; especially with a significantly weaker SOS (.455 vs .534).  But overall the south region is about what I expected it to be

Ralph Turner

Quote from: RtSLl3100 on November 02, 2016, 03:47:38 PM
I know its been a topic most the week; but surprised CWRU is ahead of Thomas More; especially with a significantly weaker SOS (.455 vs .534).  But overall the south region is about what I expected it to be
Thomas More has a loss. CWRU is undefeated.

SaintsFAN

Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2016, 03:49:41 PM
Quote from: RtSLl3100 on November 02, 2016, 03:47:38 PM
I know its been a topic most the week; but surprised CWRU is ahead of Thomas More; especially with a significantly weaker SOS (.455 vs .534).  But overall the south region is about what I expected it to be
Thomas More has a loss. CWRU is undefeated.

Its probably more nuanced than that.  There are 2 other regions that have teams with a loss in front of undefeated teams.  In fact, the only region where that didn't happen is the North. 

Its not that it matters that much to Thomas More.  They are probably going on the road if they win on Saturday and aren't going anywhere if they lose. 

I'm rooting for Case to go undefeated and host Thomas More in a Round 1 rematch of last year's game.
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs:  2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016
Bridge Bowl Champs:  1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013 (SERIES OVER)
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009, 2010, 2015
Instances where MSJ quit the Bridge Bowl:  2

crufootball

Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2016, 03:37:03 PM
Quote from: Scots13 on November 02, 2016, 03:24:26 PM
First regional rankings for the South:

1. Mary Hardin-Baylor
2. Johns Hopkins
3. Hardin-Simmons
4. Case Western Reserve
5. Thomas More
6. Muhlenberg
7. Berry
8. Maryville
9. East Texas Baptist
10. Randolph-Macon

Playing it safe at the back half. Berry has Centre left, Maryville has Huntingdon, ETBU has HSU. RMC has Guilford and HSC to finish. They are in position to win out and move up in future rankings; the others can be replaced easily, although if ETBU has a close loss to #3 HSU what will be their fate?

Also surprised a little ETBU is ninth. They are ranked #21 in both the d3football.com and AFCA Coaches' polls. 6, 7, 8 are unranked.
Please understand that ETBU has one criterion that help with the rankings for the NCAA, a loss to UMHB.
The isolated ASC doesn't get much out of Texas boost to the OOWP.

Would a 2 loss ETBU stay in the regional rankings?