MBB: Northwest Conference

Started by The Show, March 06, 2005, 08:40:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

bbaddict

Here's my list:

1. KC Wiser, LIN
2. Mike Taylor (Brewster), Whitworth
3. Taylor Mounts, Willamette
4. David Riley, Whitworth
5. Kelly Edwards, L&C
6. Brandon Shaw, Whitman
7. Stephen Wisely, GFU
8. Carson Bartlett, Pacific
9. Kaleb Shelton, UPS
10. Robbie Kunke, Willamette

No explanations.  I could work with this group.

nwhoops1903

1. Taylor (Whit)
2. Wiser
3. Riley  
4. Edwards
5. Anglin      
6. Shelton  
7. Shaw    
8. Loofburrow
9. Freidt
10. Mounts

If we went to 13. I would have 2x Gebbers.  :D  ;)
NWC fan

bbaddict

Quote from: nwhoops1903 on February 23, 2011, 09:38:09 PM
Well it is time for all conference nominations. I want the posters to name their top 10 players IN ORDER.  Top vote getter will be the pollsters POTY. It would be great to have 10 submissions by 7pm tomorrow. Conf tourney shouldn't affect voting. I will tabulate and post what I have gotten Friday. You can post your picks and or pm me if you want anonymity.

I think we will have 1st 2nd and 3rd teams filled if we can get 10 voters. Do not consider position. Best 10 guys. Hanging chads and undefined mike taylors will not be counted.

You voters DO realize that Whitworth has 2 Mike Taylors.  Does that mean the Taylor-Whitworth votes will not be counted?     ;D  Guess that will make Wiser POY.

nwhoops1903

Quote from: bbaddict on February 24, 2011, 08:22:47 PM
Quote from: nwhoops1903 on February 23, 2011, 09:38:09 PM
Well it is time for all conference nominations. I want the posters to name their top 10 players IN ORDER.  Top vote getter will be the pollsters POTY. It would be great to have 10 submissions by 7pm tomorrow. Conf tourney shouldn't affect voting. I will tabulate and post what I have gotten Friday. You can post your picks and or pm me if you want anonymity.

I think we will have 1st 2nd and 3rd teams filled if we can get 10 voters. Do not consider position. Best 10 guys. Hanging chads and undefined mike taylors will not be counted.

You voters DO realize that Whitworth has 2 Mike Taylors.  Does that mean the Taylor-Whitworth votes will not be counted?     ;D  Guess that will make Wiser POY.
Nice try!!   ;)
NWC fan

(509)Rat

Quote from: bbaddict on February 24, 2011, 08:22:47 PM
Quote from: nwhoops1903 on February 23, 2011, 09:38:09 PM
Well it is time for all conference nominations. I want the posters to name their top 10 players IN ORDER.  Top vote getter will be the pollsters POTY. It would be great to have 10 submissions by 7pm tomorrow. Conf tourney shouldn't affect voting. I will tabulate and post what I have gotten Friday. You can post your picks and or pm me if you want anonymity.

I think we will have 1st 2nd and 3rd teams filled if we can get 10 voters. Do not consider position. Best 10 guys. Hanging chads and undefined mike taylors will not be counted.

You voters DO realize that Whitworth has 2 Mike Taylors.  Does that mean the Taylor-Whitworth votes will not be counted?     ;D  Guess that will make Wiser POY.

With our Whitworth educations we are more than qualified (and intelligent enough) to make the distinction...I wouldn't expect you guys to understand  :P

bbaddict

#4655
Quote from: (509)Rat on February 24, 2011, 08:35:09 PM
Quote from: bbaddict on February 24, 2011, 08:22:47 PM
Quote from: nwhoops1903 on February 23, 2011, 09:38:09 PM
Well it is time for all conference nominations. I want the posters to name their top 10 players IN ORDER.  Top vote getter will be the pollsters POTY. It would be great to have 10 submissions by 7pm tomorrow. Conf tourney shouldn't affect voting. I will tabulate and post what I have gotten Friday. You can post your picks and or pm me if you want anonymity.

I think we will have 1st 2nd and 3rd teams filled if we can get 10 voters. Do not consider position. Best 10 guys. Hanging chads and undefined mike taylors will not be counted.

You voters DO realize that Whitworth has 2 Mike Taylors.  Does that mean the Taylor-Whitworth votes will not be counted?     ;D  Guess that will make Wiser POY.

With our Whitworth educations we are more than qualified (and intelligent enough) to make the distinction...I wouldn't expect you guys to understand  :P

Hey, I'm NOT the one who said "undefined mike taylors will not be counted" -- I'm just pointing it out.   (so, basically, you're planning to ignore your own rules?) And don't get OxyBob started on the "intelligence" discussion regarding Whitworth basketball transfers.

(509)Rat

Quote from: bbaddict on February 24, 2011, 09:07:58 PM
Quote from: (509)Rat on February 24, 2011, 08:35:09 PM
Quote from: bbaddict on February 24, 2011, 08:22:47 PM
Quote from: nwhoops1903 on February 23, 2011, 09:38:09 PM
Well it is time for all conference nominations. I want the posters to name their top 10 players IN ORDER.  Top vote getter will be the pollsters POTY. It would be great to have 10 submissions by 7pm tomorrow. Conf tourney shouldn't affect voting. I will tabulate and post what I have gotten Friday. You can post your picks and or pm me if you want anonymity.

I think we will have 1st 2nd and 3rd teams filled if we can get 10 voters. Do not consider position. Best 10 guys. Hanging chads and undefined mike taylors will not be counted.

You voters DO realize that Whitworth has 2 Mike Taylors.  Does that mean the Taylor-Whitworth votes will not be counted?     ;D  Guess that will make Wiser POY.

With our Whitworth educations we are more than qualified (and intelligent enough) to make the distinction...I wouldn't expect you guys to understand  :P

Hey, I'm NOT the one who said "undefined mike taylors will not be counted" -- I'm just pointing it out.   (so, basically, you're planning to ignore your own rules?) And don't get OxyBob started on the "intelligence" discussion regarding Whitworth basketball transfers.

With any good liberal arts education you take plenty of English/Language courses along with your chosen field of study. nwhoops was simply utilizing a literary tool to poke fun at our conference's unique situation. Aw, who am I kidding, I hate the English language...I don't know what I'm talking about

nwhoops1903

BB you are joking?  This ain't Gore v Bush. :)

I hope to see 4-5 more lists!  Gosh now I know how Ypsi feels...
NWC fan

playball

I'll make a list, but won't include myself.
1.Mike Taylor ( the one married to Taylor Taylor)   ;D
2.Kelly Edwards.  very athletic, one of the tougher match ups in the league.
3. David Riley.  Never really seen him create on his own, but hes a great shooter.
4. Taylor Mounts.  Does a lot for his team, talented.
5. Brandon Shaw.  Finished second in league, they need a guy near the top.
6. LeMar Anglin.  Tough kid, good post game.
7. Kyle Mactaggart(sp?).  Good shooter, creates well for his playoff team.  Makes them go.
8.Shelton.  Would be higher, but needs to work on his shot instead of just being an undersized post guy that gets to the line A LOT.  A hustle guy.
9. Stephen Wisely.  Should have gotten more shots this year.  Good handle and also court savvy.
10. PJ Taylor.  Court spacer for LC.  Great shooter.

I can't lie, I also believe all these Mike Taylor votes should NOT be counted... no particular reason why...   ;)

And Rat, tell the wife hi for me   :-*     ;D

Mr. Ypsi

I'm tired of this disrespect!  I vote for the Michael Taylor with 36 points and 26 rebounds on the season for POY!! :o ;D

A Buc Forever

1.  Taylor
2.  Riley
3.  Friedt
4.  C. Gebbers
5.  W. Gebbers
6.  Loofburrow
7.  Edwards
8.  Mounts
9.  Shaw
10. Duckworth

As for Dre's comments about Shelton and Wiser cracking WW's lineup.  Do you think Shelton could play on WW's perimeter?  No. Do you think he would control the inside as well as Friedt--not even close.  Could he come off the bench and dominate the inside and outside like Loofburrow?  No.  He'd get more minutes than WW's #7, but he'd still be #7.

As for Wiser, if he adapted to playing his role at WW he'd really help them. However, remember that last year Loofburrow was 9th in minutes played for WW.   From the two games I saw, he would not have helped Whitworth the way he played.
 

loggerfan1

o-v-e-r-r-a-t-e-d!   

PLU 32, WW 28. 

bbaddict

Quote from: playball on February 24, 2011, 09:49:13 PM
I'll make a list, but won't include myself.
1.Mike Taylor ( the one married to Taylor Taylor)   ;D
2.Kelly Edwards.  very athletic, one of the tougher match ups in the league.
3. David Riley.  Never really seen him create on his own, but hes a great shooter.
4. Taylor Mounts.  Does a lot for his team, talented.
5. Brandon Shaw.  Finished second in league, they need a guy near the top.
6. LeMar Anglin.  Tough kid, good post game.
7. Kyle Mactaggart(sp?).  Good shooter, creates well for his playoff team.  Makes them go.
8.Shelton.  Would be higher, but needs to work on his shot instead of just being an undersized post guy that gets to the line A LOT.  A hustle guy.
9. Stephen Wisely.  Should have gotten more shots this year.  Good handle and also court savvy.
10. PJ Taylor.  Court spacer for LC.  Great shooter.

I can't lie, I also believe all these Mike Taylor votes should NOT be counted... no particular reason why...   ;)

And Rat, tell the wife hi for me   :-*     ;D

+K  for being a classy guy & also for agreeing with me on the Taylor count.   Of course, I'm joking, evidenced by the cheesy grin when I made the comment.

Can't believe I forgot McTaggert -- he's always been especially good against WU!  Well, you can't pick everyone!!

(509)Rat

Looks like logger fans are still trying to figure out what to do now that they don't have basketball to watch...I'd suggest women's swimming but they aren't the best in the conference anymore either.

The Eastern Washington showdown, this Saturday, 7pm in Spokane. Should be a good one, I hope Whitworth doesn't go the final 9 minutes without a FG again...

playball

Quote from: A Buc Forever on February 24, 2011, 10:14:02 PM
1.  Taylor
2.  Riley
3.  Friedt
4.  C. Gebbers
5.  W. Gebbers
6.  Loofburrow
7.  Edwards
8.  Mounts
9.  Shaw
10. Duckworth

As for Dre's comments about Shelton and Wiser cracking WW's lineup.  Do you think Shelton could play on WW's perimeter?  No. Do you think he would control the inside as well as Friedt--not even close.  Could he come off the bench and dominate the inside and outside like Loofburrow?  No.  He'd get more minutes than WW's #7, but he'd still be #7.

As for Wiser, if he adapted to playing his role at WW he'd really help them. However, remember that last year Loofburrow was 9th in minutes played for WW.   From the two games I saw, he would not have helped Whitworth the way he played.
 

Nice work with the Whitworth guys up front, screws up the idea of these lists.  I don't quite get what you are saying with the whole Loofburrow example either.