MIAC in-game updates board

Started by Pat Coleman, September 01, 2011, 01:13:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Teamski

Concerned about the ST running back.  You don't want to lose him!

-Ski
Wesley College Football.... A Winning Tradition not to be soon forgotten!

OldAuggie

I noticed Roberts injury at Augsburg. I think it might be a stinger which is painful. I had one myself and they go away after a long rest but he has to play through it if he can. 
MIAC champions 1928, 1997

RoyalsFan

Huge stop for Linfield - int on 4th down.

D O.C.

I thought something but I cannot say it because of the hex factor.

STU did not burn a TO?  I'll venture Caruso was shouting at the stripes.

D O.C.

Isn't there a penalty for a coach touching a referee?

SJUrube

Toes are no longer part of the foot? I'm confused.

D O.C.

That's what we've lived on all season. Balsiger and Payne gotta make the catches.

MonroviaCat

Quote from: SJUrube on December 12, 2015, 04:22:54 PM
Toes are no longer part of the foot? I'm confused.
need to have entire foot in...
Go Cats!

MonroviaCat

well---that drive was o.k. except for the failure to find the endzone....
Go Cats!

faunch

How the heck is that not pass interference on #10 for U$T??????


"I'm a uniter...not a divider."

MonroviaCat

Quote from: faunch on December 12, 2015, 04:28:02 PM
How the heck is that not pass interference on #10 for U$T??????
Thank you---or at least holding
Go Cats!

SJUrube

Quote from: MonroviaCat on December 12, 2015, 04:26:56 PM
Quote from: SJUrube on December 12, 2015, 04:22:54 PM
Toes are no longer part of the foot? I'm confused.
need to have entire foot in...

No. Only need any part in/out of bounds for it to be a reception or no catch.

MonroviaCat

Quote from: SJUrube on December 12, 2015, 04:29:50 PM
Quote from: MonroviaCat on December 12, 2015, 04:26:56 PM
Quote from: SJUrube on December 12, 2015, 04:22:54 PM
Toes are no longer part of the foot? I'm confused.
need to have entire foot in...

No. Only need any part in/out of bounds for it to be a reception or no catch.
but not if another part of that same foot lands out of bounds in the same movement....I guess
Go Cats!

faunch

Quote from: MonroviaCat on December 12, 2015, 04:28:54 PM
Quote from: faunch on December 12, 2015, 04:28:02 PM
How the heck is that not pass interference on #10 for U$T??????
Thank you---or at least holding

Texas referees...I don't think they will call much.


"I'm a uniter...not a divider."

faunch

Jesus GC...just punt the friggin ball


"I'm a uniter...not a divider."