2014 NCAA Tournament

Started by Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan), March 01, 2014, 11:18:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

Quote from: Hoops Fan on March 03, 2014, 10:04:35 PM

Looks like I'll be heading up to Cabrini once again this year.  I was hoping Wesley could host and be closer to me, but Cabrini is just a little over an hour, so not too bad.

Not sure why you had your hopes up for Wesley hosting... they were never hosting even if they were #1 in the region or #1 in the country! :)
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

Pat Coleman

Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on March 04, 2014, 01:02:14 AM
Quote from: Hoops Fan on March 03, 2014, 10:04:35 PM

Looks like I'll be heading up to Cabrini once again this year.  I was hoping Wesley could host and be closer to me, but Cabrini is just a little over an hour, so not too bad.

Not sure why you had your hopes up for Wesley hosting... they were never hosting even if they were #1 in the region or #1 in the country! :)

And to actually explain why -- it's because Wesley's facility can't host. And they did not bid.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

kiltedbryan

Wooster was absolutely, positively the #1 team in the final Great Lakes regional rankings and Hope was surely #2. Wash U was absolutely, positively the #1 team in the final Midwest regional rankings and IWU was maybe #2, maybe lower. I think, in the NCAA's eyes, at least, that Wash U and Wooster are the clear #1 and #2 seeds, respectively, in this bracket, with Hope/IWU as flip-a-coin 3/4s.

None of the teams in the Wooster pod are within 500 miles of St. Louis, so Wash U won't host the second weekend even if there's total carnage among the top seeds in the bracket. It's possible, I suppose, that the committee considered the possibility that Wash U's women would host that second weekend and therefore felt comfortable slotting the Wooster pod into this bracket. But that would've required some advanced thinking skills not demonstrated elsewhere by the committee.

But I do think that if the four teams still standing on Saturday can all reach Wooster in 500 miles, Wooster will host due to seeding considerations over IWU or Hope. I think Wash U, St. Norbert and Webster are the three teams that can't reach Wooster without a flight.

In a way, it'd be amazing to see Geneseo State, Penn State-Behrend, Wash U and St. Norbert advance because you'd have two east teams and two west teams with 600+ miles and the entire states of Ohio, Indiana and Illinois in between them any way you measure.

sac

Wooster is highest on the bracket, suggests they're next in line to host.  After that IWU.

In order for Hope to host, you'd need WashU to win and probably St. Norbert to win at IWU or someone other than Wooster to win that regional.  Wheaton would be in the mix under the first scenario as well.

Anyone other than Wooster winning would also bring Calvin/Witt/Wilmington into the hosting the next round discussion.

Quote from: kiltedbryan on March 04, 2014, 01:22:20 AM
But that would've required some advanced thinking skills not demonstrated elsewhere by the committee.

I think we've found this years motto for the tournament.

jeffjo

Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on March 03, 2014, 09:13:19 PMThere will hopefully NEVER be a Bracket of Death to compare to 4-5 years ago - if memory serves, ONE quadrant had 7 of the top 8 teams in the d3hoops poll!!
Round #1 in 2009: 2 v. 20, 8 v. 19, and 21 v. RV; then 1, 3, 4, and 5 playing unranked teams. That's 7 round 1 games involving 9 top-21 teams; #7 Puget Sound got a bye, and then #21. So round #2 also had 2 v. 8, 3 v. 5, and 1 v. 4. Sounds like round 4 to me.

Using Massey final ratings (all I saw in their archive), it was 1 thru 11 missing only #10. That was Augustana, who didn't make it in.


David Collinge

Quote from: sac on March 04, 2014, 01:45:28 AM
Wooster is highest on the bracket, suggests they're next in line to host.  After that IWU.

In order for Hope to host, you'd need WashU to win and probably St. Norbert to win at IWU or someone other than Wooster to win that regional.  Wheaton would be in the mix under the first scenario as well.

Anyone other than Wooster winning would also bring Calvin/Witt/Wilmington into the hosting the next round discussion.

Quote from: kiltedbryan on March 04, 2014, 01:22:20 AM
But that would've required some advanced thinking skills not demonstrated elsewhere by the committee.

I think we've found this years motto for the tournament.

Apropos of nothing, it occurs to me that (in no particular order) Calvin, Hope, IWU, and Wooster have some of the very best facilities in all of D3, and I believe these are the top four in average attendance. It's too bad that only one (or none) of them will be able to host a sectional.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)

Quote from: Pat Coleman on March 04, 2014, 01:05:41 AM
Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on March 04, 2014, 01:02:14 AM
Quote from: Hoops Fan on March 03, 2014, 10:04:35 PM

Looks like I'll be heading up to Cabrini once again this year.  I was hoping Wesley could host and be closer to me, but Cabrini is just a little over an hour, so not too bad.

Not sure why you had your hopes up for Wesley hosting... they were never hosting even if they were #1 in the region or #1 in the country! :)

And to actually explain why -- it's because Wesley's facility can't host. And they did not bid.

Yeah, I guess I would know that if I'd ever been there, but that $5 admission is still keeping me away.  I was going to go to the Wesley-St. Mary's regular reason finale (which went to overtime), but we had some sick people in the house, so I stayed home.
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

y_jack_lok

Quote from: bopol on March 03, 2014, 11:34:15 PM
So there is a good chance that we'll have the 2 Sweet 16 games be repeats, even though that could have been avoided by some juggling and careful attention, which was quite lacking on the Great Lakes/Midwest/West side of the bracket.

Same thing could happen in the quadrant that has Randolph-Macon and Virginia Wesleyan.

Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan)

Quote from: y_jack_lok on March 04, 2014, 08:13:16 AM
Quote from: bopol on March 03, 2014, 11:34:15 PM
So there is a good chance that we'll have the 2 Sweet 16 games be repeats, even though that could have been avoided by some juggling and careful attention, which was quite lacking on the Great Lakes/Midwest/West side of the bracket.

Same thing could happen in the quadrant that has Randolph-Macon and Virginia Wesleyan.

Purchase and Albertus is a repeat - and that's set for round two.
Lead Columnist for D3hoops.com
@ryanalanscott just about anywhere

HOPEful

Quote from: David Collinge on March 04, 2014, 07:15:40 AM
Quote from: sac on March 04, 2014, 01:45:28 AM
Wooster is highest on the bracket, suggests they're next in line to host.  After that IWU.

In order for Hope to host, you'd need WashU to win and probably St. Norbert to win at IWU or someone other than Wooster to win that regional.  Wheaton would be in the mix under the first scenario as well.

Anyone other than Wooster winning would also bring Calvin/Witt/Wilmington into the hosting the next round discussion.

Quote from: kiltedbryan on March 04, 2014, 01:22:20 AM
But that would've required some advanced thinking skills not demonstrated elsewhere by the committee.

I think we've found this years motto for the tournament.

Apropos of nothing, it occurs to me that (in no particular order) Calvin, Hope, IWU, and Wooster have some of the very best facilities in all of D3, and I believe these are the top four in average attendance. It's too bad that only one (or none) of them will be able to host a sectional.

Reminds me of a playoff pod a few years back (2007?) with Hope playing Chicago and calvin playing Aurora. It was hosted by Aurora and I remember walking into the gym and thinking "my high school gym was twice this size and twice as nice"... Hope beat calvin the next day, roughly 200 miles away from both schools... Ten years prior, they played each other in Van Andel Arena in downtown Grand Rapids with more than 11,000 fans watching... I believe this is still a D3 record.

Fine line, however. If Hope and calvin meet in the playoffs, the gym should be able to hold all of the people willing to make the 3 hour drive. But, from a "fairness" standpoint, how much should facilities really factor into hosting. Obviously, it's needed to some extent. But the next round should go to Wooster, IWU, or Washington, based on merit. If those don't work because of the 500 mile rule, then Hope/Wheaton.
Let's go Dutchmen!

2015-2016 1-&-Done Tournament Fantasy League Co-Champion

lildave678

Quote from: Hoops Fan on March 04, 2014, 08:27:12 AM
Purchase and Albertus is a repeat - and that's set for round two.

Not sure about the other games but this was a late January game too. Not like it was a first semester, pre-conference game.

John Gleich

Here's an idea to throw out there...

This committee lacked the creativity to make a bracket that balanced things as well as they could have been balanced, set up a definitive west vs. east championship, gave a bye where it didn't need to be given, etc etc.

They appear to have been in over their heads when it came to the bracketing process.  Also, there was some disagreement with the selection, but let's leave one alone for a bit.


Why does the national committee do the bracketing AND the selection? Why isn't there a second (RESTED, Correctly THINKING, etc etc) committee to set up the brackets? The selection committee has a tough job... weeding through the possible field... and then we expect them to turn around and make intelligent decisions on brackets, given certain restraints (but one of which is NOT balance, creativity, etc)...


I think that the NCAA needs to have two different committees. One to select the teams and a second committee to set up the brackets.
UWSP Men's Basketball

National Champions: 2015, 2010, 2005, 2004

NCAA appearances: 2018, '15, '14, '13, '12, '11, '10, '09, '08, '07, '05, '04, '03, '00, 1997

WIAC/WSUC Champs: 2015, '14, '13, '11, '09, '07, '05, '03, '02, '01, '00, 1993, '92, '87, '86, '85, '84, '83, '82, '69, '61, '57, '48, '42, '37, '36, '35, '33, '18

Twitter: @JohnGleich

Pat Coleman

Quote from: sethteater on March 04, 2014, 08:50:00 AM
Quote from: David Collinge on March 04, 2014, 07:15:40 AM
Quote from: sac on March 04, 2014, 01:45:28 AM
Wooster is highest on the bracket, suggests they're next in line to host.  After that IWU.

In order for Hope to host, you'd need WashU to win and probably St. Norbert to win at IWU or someone other than Wooster to win that regional.  Wheaton would be in the mix under the first scenario as well.

Anyone other than Wooster winning would also bring Calvin/Witt/Wilmington into the hosting the next round discussion.

Quote from: kiltedbryan on March 04, 2014, 01:22:20 AM
But that would've required some advanced thinking skills not demonstrated elsewhere by the committee.

I think we've found this years motto for the tournament.

Apropos of nothing, it occurs to me that (in no particular order) Calvin, Hope, IWU, and Wooster have some of the very best facilities in all of D3, and I believe these are the top four in average attendance. It's too bad that only one (or none) of them will be able to host a sectional.

Reminds me of a playoff pod a few years back (2007?) with Hope playing Chicago and calvin playing Aurora. It was hosted by Aurora and I remember walking into the gym and thinking "my high school gym was twice this size and twice as nice"... Hope beat calvin the next day, roughly 200 miles away from both schools... Ten years prior, they played each other in Van Andel Arena in downtown Grand Rapids with more than 11,000 fans watching... I believe this is still a D3 record.

Fine line, however. If Hope and calvin meet in the playoffs, the gym should be able to hold all of the people willing to make the 3 hour drive. But, from a "fairness" standpoint, how much should facilities really factor into hosting. Obviously, it's needed to some extent. But the next round should go to Wooster, IWU, or Washington, based on merit. If those don't work because of the 500 mile rule, then Hope/Wheaton.

Aurora's gym is a perfectly reasonable Division III gym. The bar should be set even lower than that, frankly, for hosting the tournament.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

sac

Attendance from that Hope/Calvin game at Aurora was 1800 with some seating blocked off.  It was perfectly acceptable.
http://miaa.org/mbb/stats/0607/0303hoca.htm


In fact at that time, 2000 might have been the 3rd largest Gym in the MIAA.

Pat Coleman

Quote from: sac on March 04, 2014, 11:05:02 AM
Attendance from that Hope/Calvin game at Aurora was 1800 with some seating blocked off.  It was perfectly acceptable.
http://miaa.org/mbb/stats/0607/0303hoca.htm


In fact at that time, 2000 might have been the 3rd largest Gym in the MIAA.

Good point. A first-weekend set of games could be played in buildings of less than half that size, with clearing the gym between games if necessary.
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.