FB: Region 6 fan poll

[desertcat1]

Wasn't a misprint on my part...just reporting the results.

02, 
will you send me a copy of my results please , i need to update settings? no copy here on the road .    I will blame it on the twins.
dc1,

[desertcat1]

ok boys here we go . My results are in and i changed the settings.  ...  1.  UWW, 2. Cats ,3. Wart, 4. st tom, 5. Whitworth, 6.P- DOGS, 7. UWP, 8, uwo, 9. st john, 10. Con Mor

Little Guru says,  " it's not who you lost to but, WHO you beat.   So their/four,   When they beat PLU 37 t0 7 i gave them( p-dogs) a jump .
They are for real.  Should be a REAL DOG N CAT fight sat at the CATDOME.

Looking back I should have done the same for UWP? always next week. 
dc1

[ExTartanPlayer]

Little Guru says,  " it's not who you lost to but, WHO you beat.   So their/four,   When they beat PLU 37 t0 7 i gave them( p-dogs) a jump .

This would carry a little more weight if Pacific Lutheran wasn't already 0-3.  And it's not like Pac Lu lost to Whitewater and Mount Union...they lost to a pair of good-but-not-great teams.

I understand the "it's not who you lost to, but who you beat" train of thinking from a broad perspective, but there has to be some penalty for losing to a mediocre team, right?  Pacific's other results are uninspiring.  If you're relying on a home win against an 0-3 team to justify ranking them ahead of Platteville, Oshkosh, and SJU...wait, ahead of Platteville and SJU?

St. John's 45, Dubuque 9
UW-Platteville 31, Dubuque 7
Dubuque 31, Pacific 29

I know comparative scores are a dangerous game, but this is just silly, to rank Pacific ahead of not one but two teams that both blew out the team who beat Pacific.  If all of the games were close, maybe-sorta.  But Dubuque was thoroughly blasted by both Platteville and St. John's, then beat Pacific.  If it's "who you beat" and not "who you lost to" why isn't Dubuque up here, then?  After all, Dubuque felled Pacific.

[d-train]

Little Guru says,  " it's not who you lost to but, WHO you beat.   So their/four,   When they beat PLU 37 t0 7 i gave them( p-dogs) a jump .

This would carry a little more weight if Pacific Lutheran wasn't already 0-3.  And it's not like Pac Lu lost to Whitewater and Mount Union...they lost to a pair of good-but-not-great teams.

I understand the "it's not who you lost to, but who you beat" train of thinking from a broad perspective, but there has to be some penalty for losing to a mediocre team, right?  Pacific's other results are uninspiring.  If you're relying on a home win against an 0-3 team to justify ranking them ahead of Platteville, Oshkosh, and SJU...wait, ahead of Platteville and SJU?

St. John's 45, Dubuque 9
UW-Platteville 31, Dubuque 7
Dubuque 31, Pacific 29

I know comparative scores are a dangerous game, but this is just silly, to rank Pacific ahead of not one but two teams that both blew out the team who beat Pacific.  If all of the games were close, maybe-sorta.  But Dubuque was thoroughly blasted by both Platteville and St. John's, then beat Pacific.  If it's "who you beat" and not "who you lost to" why isn't Dubuque up here, then?  After all, Dubuque felled Pacific.

meh. While I totally agree, it's not worth your time. His opinion is his opinion - no matter how faulty the logic or how much/little thought he put into it. That's why there are 8 or 9 other voters. Outliers don't skew the overall results.

[desertcat1]

Little Guru says,  " it's not who you lost to but, WHO you beat.   So their/four,   When they beat PLU 37 t0 7 i gave them( p-dogs) a jump .

This would carry a little more weight if Pacific Lutheran wasn't already 0-3.  And it's not like Pac Lu lost to Whitewater and Mount Union...they lost to a pair of good-but-not-great teams.

I understand the "it's not who you lost to, but who you beat" train of thinking from a broad perspective, but there has to be some penalty for losing to a mediocre team, right?  Pacific's other results are uninspiring.  If you're relying on a home win against an 0-3 team to justify ranking them ahead of Platteville, Oshkosh, and SJU...wait, ahead of Platteville and SJU?

St. John's 45, Dubuque 9
UW-Platteville 31, Dubuque 7
Dubuque 31, Pacific 29

I know comparative scores are a dangerous game, but this is just silly, to rank Pacific ahead of not one but two teams that both blew out the team who beat Pacific.  If all of the games were close, maybe-sorta.  But Dubuque was thoroughly blasted by both Platteville and St. John's, then beat Pacific.  If it's "who you beat" and not "who you lost to" why isn't Dubuque up here, then?  After all, Dubuque felled Pacific.

meh. While I totally agree, it's not worth your time. His opinion is his opinion - no matter how faulty the logic or how much/little thought he put into it. That's why there are 8 or 9 other voters. Outliers don't skew the overall results.

stir that pot big boy.    keep on track.
sat night will tell the tail.

[d-train]

stir that pot big boy.    keep on track.
sat night will tell the tail.

I'm flattered that you still give so much respect to a win over PLU!

[desertcat1]

stir that pot big boy.    keep on track.
sat night will tell the tail.

I'm flattered that you still give so much respect to a win over PLU!

Always big boy.   Lutes are a class act.   Can't understand why the young boys this year have not pulled it all together Hope they get it going this week over the bearkitties.

[jknezek]

stir that pot big boy.    keep on track.
sat night will tell the tail.

Tale is told. Logic beats irrational opinions.

[desertcat1]

stir that pot big boy.    keep on track.
sat night will tell the tail.

Tale is told. Logic beats irrational opinions.

is the pot calling the kettle black?

[Andy Jamison - Walla Walla Wildcat]

This week he will have Whitworth as #4 ahead of Uww and Uwo

[D O.C.]

Let's discuss Football with humor. 

[desertcat1]

This week he will have Whitworth as #4 ahead of Uww and Uwo

u been reading my mail     could be stay tuned

[art76]

I am very curious to know how things shake out here with the results of the games this past week.

[02 Warhawk]

Agree...still waiting on 3 more polls. Hopefully we can get 10 participants this time. I didn't get one from wartnight last week.

[desertcat1]

Agree...still waiting on 3 more polls. Hopefully we can get 10 participants this time. I didn't get one from wartnight last week.

02,
maybe you should have a  deadline or cut off date ? then  go with what you have?