2019 Pool C

[UfanBill]

Pat and Greg, First trying to log in to leave a comment on your Bracket Predictions page is a njghtmare. Why can't we use our boards login?

Now my comment...First Pat, Keith and Adam all picked Union to be upset by RPI in the Dutchmen Shoes game...Wrong...Union won 33-0. Now in your Bracket predictions you have the Dutchmen in the sacrificial pairing with Mt.Union in a potential round 2 game even though you have moved Union into a 2 East ranking. Union is 10-0 with 2 RRO wins. Why would they be in a 4 seed spot? They've been surprising you all season haven't they? I hope the committee gives them more credit than you do.

[edward de vere]

Pat and Greg, First trying to log in to leave a comment on your Bracket Predictions page is a njghtmare. Why can't we use our boards login?

I'll second this motion.

[HScoach]

Pat and Greg, First trying to log in to leave a comment on your Bracket Predictions page is a njghtmare. Why can't we use our boards login?

I'll second this motion.

Likewise

[thunderdog]

Susquehanna has a better SOS than NCC, .518 versus .500).

Both are 0-1 RRO.

I have a hard time imagining Susque going 5 rounds on the board.




Updated SOS  Susque .504; NCC .500

NCC could very easily end up 1-1 vs RRO (WashU)

[Ralph Turner]

Susquehanna has a better SOS than NCC, .518 versus .500).

Both are 0-1 RRO.

I have a hard time imagining Susque going 5 rounds on the board.




Updated SOS  Susque .504; NCC .500

NCC could very easily end up 1-1 vs RRO (WashU)

As could Susque (JHU)

[Pat Coleman]

Pat and Greg, First trying to log in to leave a comment on your Bracket Predictions page is a njghtmare. Why can't we use our boards login?

I'll second this motion.

Likewise

The comments function used on news pages is pretty commonly used across a bunch of sites elsewhere. Lots of people have logins already, or you can log in with your social media accounts.

The 2005 technology that this board putters along on is not able to be ported out in such a manner.

[@d3jason]

Pat and Greg, First trying to log in to leave a comment on your Bracket Predictions page is a njghtmare. Why can't we use our boards login?

Now my comment...First Pat, Keith and Adam all picked Union to be upset by RPI in the Dutchmen Shoes game...Wrong...Union won 33-0. Now in your Bracket predictions you have the Dutchmen in the sacrificial pairing with Mt.Union in a potential round 2 game even though you have moved Union into a 2 East ranking. Union is 10-0 with 2 RRO wins. Why would they be in a 4 seed spot? They've been surprising you all season haven't they? I hope the committee gives them more credit than you do.

Non conference scheduling needs to be beefed up IMO.

[HScoach]

Pat and Greg, First trying to log in to leave a comment on your Bracket Predictions page is a njghtmare. Why can't we use our boards login?

I'll second this motion.

Likewise

The comments function used on news pages is pretty commonly used across a bunch of sites elsewhere. Lots of people have logins already, or you can log in with your social media accounts.

The 2005 technology that this board putters along on is not able to be ported out in such a manner.

Hmmm, guess us old farts that don't have a social media account will just take our ball and go home.

[Ralph Turner]

5:39 PM EST and still no Selection Show!  ARGH!

[Inkblot]

5:39 PM EST and still no Selection Show!  ARGH!

I've been watching it...

[edward de vere]

The 2005 technology that this board putters along on is not able to be ported out in such a manner.

2005 technology is pretty much how I roll.  Of course, in 2005 I was basically in 1986.

[Jim Matson]

Interesting to see UMHB and Whitewater in the same section.

[Inkblot]

So North Central gets in while Susquehanna and John Carroll don't.

[edward de vere]

It's hard to see how Salisbury could have received a more fortunate draw.

[AO]

It's hard to see how Salisbury could have received a more fortunate draw.

Geography is a major advantage.  Not much more Chapman could have done to get a #1 seed.