Poll: Final 4 surprise teams

Started by Baldini, March 02, 2022, 11:23:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which section of the bracket is most likely to produce a surprise Final 4 team?

Upper Left
1 (7.1%)
Lower Left
4 (28.6%)
Upper Right
0 (0%)
Lower Right
5 (35.7%)
There will be no surprises
4 (28.6%)

Total Members Voted: 14

Voting closed: March 11, 2022, 11:23:48 AM

Baldini

Anyone have a team they think is riding high and could make a surprise run? I think there are several, anyone have any thoughts on it?

ronk

 I'll take a #3 seed Yeshiva; I think they'll make the Elite 8 game, at least.

Baldini

Quote from: ronk on March 02, 2022, 11:31:09 AM
I'll take a #3 seed Yeshiva; I think they'll make the Elite 8 game, at least.

This is an understandable misunderstanding, and I should have noted Women's bracket, but I did post this in the Women's Basketball section.

Agree that Yeshiva is a good one on the men's side though.

ronk

 I should have noticed; in that case, I'll choose #3 seed Rhodes, hosting because the UMHB men are hosting.

gordonmann

At the risk of spoiling the Tournament preview I'm writing, here are a couple:

* Hope quadrant: I'm not sure if Amherst or Tufts counts as a spoiler, given their pedigree, but they aren't as dominant or even consistently Top 10. I really like the front court strength and back court shooting that Whitman brings to the table, too.

* Simpson quadrant: I've been high on UW-Whitewater all season and have had them higher than the poll, even after losses. They have a similar profile to Whitman. If you think Tufts or Amherst has a chance to make the Final Four, then include Smith in that, too.

* Hope quadrant: NYU is hard to guage because the UAA had a down year. But I've liked what I've seen on video, for whatever that's worth. UW-Eau Claire could get hot from outside (where they do most of their shooting) and beat anyone. I don't know if the Blugolds can string that together for four games in a row. Or how about Scranton?

* Transylvania quadrant: I think this is the most open quadrant. Trine's not really a surprise, but I could see UMHB winning that bracket. Again, I've been much higher on the Cru than the rest of the pollsters.

Baldini

Quote from: gordonmann on March 02, 2022, 01:01:13 PM
At the risk of spoiling the Tournament preview I'm writing, here are a couple:

* Hope quadrant: I'm not sure if Amherst or Tufts counts as a spoiler, given their pedigree, but they aren't as dominant or even consistently Top 10. I really like the front court strength and back court shooting that Whitman brings to the table, too.

* Simpson quadrant: I've been high on UW-Whitewater all season and have had them higher than the poll, even after losses. They have a similar profile to Whitman. If you think Tufts or Amherst has a chance to make the Final Four, then include Smith in that, too.

* Hope quadrant: NYU is hard to guage because the UAA had a down year. But I've liked what I've seen on video, for whatever that's worth. UW-Eau Claire could get hot from outside (where they do most of their shooting) and beat anyone. I don't know if the Blugolds can string that together for four games in a row. Or how about Scranton?

* Transylvania quadrant: I think this is the most open quadrant. Trine's not really a surprise, but I could see UMHB winning that bracket. Again, I've been much higher on the Cru than the rest of the pollsters.

Whitman and UW-EC are two the jumped out at me also. UW-EC is one of a very small number of teams that could knock off Hope, IMHO.

MrMaus

CNU bracket:
I have Trinity, TX over Hardin-Simmons in the first round, I think the rest go off without an upset.

Whitman v Trinity is going to be interesting. If Whitman keeps it slow and half court I think they can pull this off. It also then bodes very well for them against CNU. While CNU v Trinity would be a track meet.

Amherst v Tufts take 3. It is really hard to beat a good team three times in the same season. The first time Tufts had Covid issues, the second time Amherst was the one missing bodies, but the outcome was the same. Unless Tufts figures out how to stop Amherst's offense (or Amherst goes 1-14 on open threes like the first three quarters of the Bates game) it will go the same way again.

Amherst (or Tufts) v CNU would be a clash of styles. CNU scores 85 a game, 34 of those "off turnovers" and 22 from behind the 3 point line. Can CNU score points out of a half court offense with a 5'10"-6'1" guard playing defense against Fan? And can they stop a team that brings three 6'0" plus players into a disciplined offensive set eating 20 seconds of clock each trip that only turns the ball over 14 times a game, and most of those on entry passes to the post? Whichever team can impose its style for the majority of the 40 minutes would win.

But getting the 1 and 2 (or 3) seeds into the elite eight is not bringing a "spoiler" to the table.

MrMaus

Hope Bracket:
As much fun as the games will be I think it is the top four seeds; Hope, Eau Claire and NYU, Scranton. Not really sure how it plays out but it is Hope's to lose, if they don't lay an egg they are through. Again, not sure bringing the top four seeds in is a spoiler.

Smith Bracket:
Just the opposite in my mind. Smith, DePauw, Whitewater, Gettysburg, Baldwin Wallace, Wis. Lutheran or Simpson - take your pick. It feels like any one of those seven could get hot enough to win 4 straight. Covid has created a situation where none of these teams have deep tournament experience (if I did my research none played a sweet 16 game in 2019, we didn't have sweet 16 games in 2020 and no tournament in 2021) so it may be just which team stays calm and composed the second weekend.

Transylvania Bracket:
Transylvania, Ithaca and Trine. One of those three (again top 3 seeds) will represent. The Ithaca v Trine game will be great and the Transylvania v winner will be fantastic. But, not bringing a spoiler.

Augie2020

In Tufts pod don't pass on Desales very well coached team that plays tough defense and can Shoot!

scottiedawg

Quote from: MrMaus on March 02, 2022, 01:41:04 PM
Amherst (or Tufts) v CNU would be a clash of styles. CNU scores 85 a game, 34 of those "off turnovers" and 22 from behind the 3 point line. Can CNU score points out of a half court offense with a 5'10"-6'1" guard playing defense against Fan? And can they stop a team that brings three 6'0" plus players into a disciplined offensive set eating 20 seconds of clock each trip that only turns the ball over 14 times a game, and most of those on entry passes to the post? Whichever team can impose its style for the majority of the 40 minutes would win.

I am so interested to see how the elite turnover teams (specifically CNU and Hope) do against teams that take care of the ball.

Roundball999

Quote from: scottiedawg on March 02, 2022, 04:09:03 PM
Quote from: MrMaus on March 02, 2022, 01:41:04 PM
Amherst (or Tufts) v CNU would be a clash of styles. CNU scores 85 a game, 34 of those "off turnovers" and 22 from behind the 3 point line. Can CNU score points out of a half court offense with a 5'10"-6'1" guard playing defense against Fan? And can they stop a team that brings three 6'0" plus players into a disciplined offensive set eating 20 seconds of clock each trip that only turns the ball over 14 times a game, and most of those on entry passes to the post? Whichever team can impose its style for the majority of the 40 minutes would win.

I am so interested to see how the elite turnover teams (specifically CNU and Hope) do against teams that take care of the ball.

Well, Trine is #8 in D3 for fewest turnovers, at 12.9 per game over the full season.  That includes averaging over 20/game in 3 games vs. Hope.

gordonmann

True, but Trine wouldn't see CNU until the title game.

Whitman, Amherst and Tufts are in the CNU bracket. My sense is they are all pretty good with the ball.

MrMaus

Quote from: gordonmann on March 02, 2022, 05:04:13 PM
True, but Trine wouldn't see CNU until the title game.

Whitman, Amherst and Tufts are in the CNU bracket. My sense is they are all pretty good with the ball.

Having watched those three they do have 14-15 turnovers a game, but the vast majority come when they are trying to get an entry pass to the post. And those types of turnovers don't typically lead to fast breaks. Does not mean a CNU (or Hope) won't get their turnovers with quick hands and aggressiveness, just that they won't get easy points off them. CNU gets fast break points and open threes from disorganized transition defense, those should be far and few between if someone wants to beat them.

Because Hope can create points out of a half court set. For someone to beat Hope the team will have to minimize giving up transition points, shoot efficiently from three point range and maintain poise if you are ahead in the 4th quarter as Hope ratchets up the pressure. And then make your free throws.

Roundball999

Quote from: gordonmann on March 02, 2022, 05:04:13 PM
True, but Trine wouldn't see CNU until the title game.

Whitman, Amherst and Tufts are in the CNU bracket. My sense is they are all pretty good with the ball.

Agreed, would be so interesting to see any of them against CNU.  Was just pointing out an example of a team that takes care of the ball just about as well as anyone (Trine) against the other of the "elite turnover teams" mentioned.

Baldini

The teams in the tournament with the fewest turnovers per game average.

UW-Oshkosh - 10.9
UW-EC - 11.1
Bates - 11.8
Wisconsin Lutheran - 11.9
Trine - 12.9

There may be a Bo Ryan trickledown effect influence with coaches in Wisconsin concerning turnovers.